Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's roles in ancient Rome
Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Essay on assassination of Julius Caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women's roles in ancient Rome
Hortensia's speech before the Second Triumvirate "Hortensia's speech before the Second Triumvirate: Rome, 42 B.C." was an outrage of women of Rome against the tax law put forward by the Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, and Marcus Antonius in order to sponsor a war against the enemy of the Republic, those who conspired to assassinate Julius Cesar. Prior to enforcing the tax law in order to collect from rich women, the triumvirs prosecuted men as enemies of the state and sold their assets to fund the war. However, when men's money were not enough, the triumvirs turned to the rich women. The women affected by the law went to the women close to the triumvirs and found support in most of them. However, Fulvia, the wife of Marcus Antonius, did not wish to support them, and upset by this the women decided to go in front of the forum hosted by the tribunal of the triumvirs. Hortensia, a great orator of her time, was selected as a speaker for the group. …show more content…
Hortensia start her speech by saying that at first their group did what is normally done in communicating their concerns to the triumvirs, they went to their women.
However, since they did not receive support from all of their women, they had no other choice but to come and speak at the forum themselves. She says that after losing their husbands, brothers, and sons to the persecutions by the triumvirs, if their property is also taken away they will be worthless and shamed. Also, if their actions against the women are based on something bad they did, they should persecuted them in the same way they persecuted their husbands. However, they did not commit any such crime. Why should they give contributions if they have no rights and voices in the politics. Despite it being a time of war, never in history it was that women had to give contributions. The only contributions that women made where in form of jewels and they did it on their own free will. Also, the women refuse to pay taxes for such cause as
war. Right after the speech the triumvirs were angry about the women speaking up in the forum. But, in the end the speech made an influence and the law was changed to tax less women and to make rich men contribute to the cause. 1. Were the women of their time allowed to own property, or was there special circumstances for the women of Rome? 2. If the husbands, brothers, and sons of those women were already persecuted and most likely killed or imprisoned, how come the property has not been taken away? This is going back to my first question.
for the rights of women, and she even brought her own family into the rebellion to assist her in
The women’s job in that era are meant keep her house clean and feed her children (Doc C). They are also dependent on the city administration to make their lives decent (Doc C). The women’s suffrage movement fought because woman needed to fulfil her traditional responsibilities in the house and to her children, which makes it a must to use the ballot and have the home safe (Doc C). All women needs to have a chance to voice their opinion to help the community strive, and one way to do that is making them able to vote.
I also think that she has another audience in mind. She is also addressing the city officials, the politicians and the rest of the male population in society. She is addressing the city officials and the politicians because they are the people responsible for the decision making in the implementation of any new changes in the voting rights. She is also addressing the rest of the male population, such as the husbands, the fathers, the brothers, the nephews to stand by the women and support them in gaining their voting right in order to raise and educate a better generation of sons and daughters.
When looking at Terborg-Penn’s article with the speech Susan B. Anthony gave in 1873, we see a contrast of feminist ideas. Susan B. Anthony speaks about the equality that women
Because little is known about why Anne Hutchinson acted as she did, she has become a veritable chalice into which historians, political scientists and feminists can pour their own ideas. As a result, interpretations of Ann...
In the early 20th century, many Americans perceived woman as unskilled and deficient, due to this woman have never gotten the chance to prove how they can positively affect society. Document A, Supports Woman states; “They still love their homes and their children just the same as ever, and are better able to protect themselves and their children because of the ballot”. If woman were given the right to vote it would not only have helped the society by having more opinions, but it would have also helped women protect themselves and their children by voting for things like better education. Supports Woman explains how giving woman the right ...
Rather than using the new political rights and civil freedoms to better care for their families, women were swarming in the streets brandishing weapons at each other, meddling in political affairs, of which they had little knowledge and generally causing disorder (Landes 100). As a result, the Assembly felt that women had proven themselves as, “lacking in their physical as well as moral strength required to debate, deliberate and formulate resolution” declared Ander Amar (Wollstonecraft 87). Thus when, women broke out from their traditional sphere and used the newfound rights for purposes other than conversing with their men and educating children , they found themselves right where they had started, confined into the home and the suffocating embrace of their men.
Lydia Marie Child’s approach to the matter of women’s rights is eloquent; she addresses her perception of the matter while maintaining a calm, incisive disposition. Even when she is obviously distraught, she manages to maintain composure. The fact that she cites many other works in her letter sug...
When she returned Octavian urged her to divorce her husband and she could then create her own household, yet she had refused. She begged Octavian not to start a war because of her but for different reasons if needed be. She had continued to live in Mark Antony’s household, attending to not only her children but the children from his previous marriage. She had also welcomed any guests that Antony had sent over. This proved the ideal elite Roman wife in society, which was supporting, dutiful and loyal4. Octavian did not listen to her, he did not start a war but he used this information as propaganda against Mark Antony, he exploited that Mark Antony was under the control of a foreign women, which was added with the influence of alcohol, other drugs or magic spells. Octavian talked about how Mark Antony’s lack of self-discipline, masculinity did not only look bad on Antony but to the Roman state as well5. Octavian had insulted Mark Antony as weak and out of control, and compared him to a Roman woman instead of a man, which was considered a huge disgrace to Rome, which could’ve been avoided had not Octavian used the information against Mark Antony which was against his sisters
Although they were fighting for a worthy cause, many did not agree with these women’s radical views. These conservative thinkers caused a great road-block on the way to enfranchisement. Most of them were men, who were set in their thoughts about women’s roles, who couldn’t understand why a woman would deserve to vote, let alone want to vote. But there were also many women who were not concerned with their fundamental right to vote. Because some women were indifferent in regards to suffrage, they set back those who were working towards the greater good of the nation. However, the suffragettes were able to overcome these obstacles by altering their tactics, while still maintaining their objective.
She was the daughter of the orator Quintus Hortensius and lived during the final years of the Roman Republic. After the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE, civil war broke out, causing a significant budget problem for the new triumvirate. In response to their need for money, the government decided to impose a tax on 1,400 wealthy Roman women. Hortensia would not stand for this. She gave a speech in the forum condemning the triumvirs for instituting a tax on these women who neither had representation in their government nor did they have any part in beginning the war. Her words and actions not only convinced the triumvirate to reduce the number of women taxed to 400, but they also included men in their new
Suffrage is a very important topic regarding women, and it is something that they fought for during the years. There were several factors that led to women pushing and pushing harder for suffrage. An example was how they were regarded, how limited they felt, and to have autonomy from their husbands. Document B clearly shows the sexist view that damaged women ideal, which was that they were created for the purpose of bearing children. This ideal, led to women feeling limited in what they could do, and even doubt their own capacities.
Women did not have equal rights to men. Their role was to take care of the household and the children. They weren’t even allowed to own land unless their husband passed away. African American women had even less rights than the white women. Some had to push to even become educated. Sarah Grimke wrote a powerful letter to fight for equality of men and women. To challenge all women to come together at the end of Sarah’s note she states “The page of history teems with women’s wrongs, and it is wet with women’s tears.—For the sake of my degraded sex everywhere, and for the sake of my brethren, who suffer just in proportion as they place woman lower in the scale of creation than man…I entreat my sisters to arise…in all the dignity of immortal beings, and plant themselves, side by side, on the platform of human rights, with man to whom they were
These women stood by their beliefs, wanting to improve the new republic, seeing it as a way to help better the lives of all citizens. Stanton's writing "Declaration of
Towards the end of the speech, the anti suffragettes who are attacking Shaw’s argument make one last stand as one man out in the crowd screams out, “Well what does a woman know of war anyway?” Immediately, her reaction leads into a pathos-woven anecdote describing the horrors thousands of mothers would soon