Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How art plays in religion
How art plays in religion
Mental imagery and perception
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How art plays in religion
Images are like a spinning wheel that is constantly changing as individuals experience the visual world around them. Since images assist individuals in creating a visual world unique to them, they create a limitless power of their own. These powers that the images possess can truly change the life of the individual who takes on the images within his or her mind. The language of images is the meaning behind the images that surround an individual in his or her life. These powers can exist through the personal, cultural, and political form. John Berger in his essay “Ways of Seeing.” discusses how the ways of seeing influence the connection people have to each other. Karen Armstrong’s “Homo Religiosus.” looks at the arts and disciplines of various …show more content…
religions from the past. Oliver Sacks’ essay “The Mind’s Eye.” discusses how blind individuals were able to continue to see in their lives despite being blind. In his essay “The Power of Context.”, Malcolm Gladwell proposes that an individual’s behavior is based on his or her social context. Through these texts, there seems to be a distinct difference between the perception of how groups of people and individuals are supposed to act. Groups of people are expected to behave in uniformity which is the opposite of individuals who want to have freedom, independence, and diversity. People use the language of images to give power to individuals so they can make an attempt at self-actualization, but the language of images is also used to maintain conformity within groups of people. People use the language of images by allowing for individuals to continue to achieve in their lives the goals and experiences that they desire. Everyone has aspirations and goals that they want to attain. People are “seeking to give meaning to our [their] lives, of trying to understand the history of which we can become the active agents” (Berger 72). People try to give meaning to their life through the goals that they expect them to achieve. Without a purpose in life, individuals won’t have the motivation to stay driven in their lifestyle. Nearly all of these people face constant obstacles and bumps along their way to achieving success. Many people in the face of these obstacles and bumps will lose hope, determination, and commitment. This will lead to the individual not achieving his or her goals. However, if an individual adapts to the circumstances of his or her situation, he or she can still succeed in achieving his or her goals. In the practices of past religions children were put through adulthood initiations and “If the initiation is properly conducted, a youth will be forced to reach for inner resources that he did not know he possessed.” (Armstrong 5) Individuals need to look to adapt through the various abilities that they possess and need to take advantage of all of the resources that they have. An Austrian psychologist named Zoltan Torey was able to adapt to his new life as a blind individual by using his ability to visualize his world. Torey “resolving [resolved] to develop instead his inner eye, his powers of visual imagery, to their greatest possible extent” (Sacks 332). By doing so, Torey was able to continue to perform activities that he loved like carpentry. When an individual goes through different situations within his or her life, he or she needs to constantly evolve and change to continue to succeed just like Torey. Torey continued to hold visual imagery to tasks such as carpentry and roof repair because “Torey’s adaptation was largely shaped by conscious motive, will, and purpose” (Sacks 337). Another blind person named Arlene Gordon was able to create visual images in her mind through verbal descriptions that allowed her to create visual images within her mind. This shows that “Language, that most human invention, can enable what, in principle, should not be possible. It can allow all of us, even the congenitally blind, to see with another person’s eyes.” (Sacks 345) Language is an ability that can be used to create a visual world of its own as powerful as the ability to see with eyes. It uses the images that are created through the words of the language to give the power of vision to the person interpreting the language. These blind individuals were able to use their diverse inner abilities to achieve success in achieving their goals. The language of images that they created within their mind allowed for them to attain their goals despite being blind. People use the language of images to conserve the ability for political regimes to control the way individuals act within the political system that they exist in.
The political institutions that exist around the globe set up a system in which the citizens of that area are expected to adhere to. This system that is created consists of a set of rules and laws that citizens must follow. These rules are instituted because the leaders of government want to hold a firm control in their ruling of the people. The political systems want people to conform to the expectations put on them. Additionally, political systems are created to ensure that the country is fully functioning and need the cooperation of the people to do so. However, it is not always easy for political leaders to establish strong control since citizens may go against the rules that are put upon them. Malcolm Gladwell explains the prominence of crime by the idea that “If a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge.” (141) People will take on a perspective based on what they see and what they think what they see represents. The act of committing crimes works in a imitative form because “The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe.” (Berger 50) People will commit crimes if they see that their is no punishment or repercussions for their actions similar to a cascading effect. If images of crimes like graffiti are associated with punishment, people simply won’t commit the crime. However, political systems can change this by the way they mold their regulation of the public. Political systems show that “an epidemic can be reversed, can be tipped, by tinkering with the smallest details of the immediate environment” (Gladwell 146). This is all a part of political systems controlling the public through the language of images. Political leaders like the ones in New York City described by Gladwell tried to get the public to
conform to the laws by associating minor crimes with punishment. The political systems are controlling the behaviors of the people based on the type of images they expose to the public like associating a crime with punishment. The language of images is used to conform people to the principles of religious arts and disciplines from the past. Religion gets people to act in a uniform way through its guiding principles. Religion sets up principles on how people should behave, how they should think, and what they should believe because “The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe.” (Berger 50) Religion creates a set of knowledge within the follower. Since their are millions of followers of several religions, individuals develop a natural inclination to conform. Religions of the past were “based on what has been called the perennial philosophy, because it was present in some form in so many premodern cultures” (Armstrong 4). Religion is a repetitive form that remains constant throughout its history. Its practices of the past are still seen today as “This type of initiation was crucial in ancient religion and is practiced in traditional societies today.” (Armstrong 5) Its practices are done the same way as a part of a traditional history and in this way creates conformity within the behaviors and thoughts of religious followers. Religion has created its permanent mark on people because “Religion was not something tacked on to the human condition, an optional extra imposed on people by unscrupulous priests.” (Armstrong 6) Since religion works in this way, it allures people into becoming the same as a way of meeting the expectations of religion. Religion indicates that people should “not cling to our selfhood” (Armstrong 12). Religion calls for people to lose their individualism and removes the diversity that exists within the population. Religion wants people to become dedicated to the principles of religion not to the desires of the individual. Therefore, religion promotes conformity within its followers. People use the language of images to form different thought processes between the groups of the past and ongoing present groups who experience the environment around them. Individuals from the past and the ongoing present have a created a different visual world from each other through the way they see and live in the world around them. It is believed that the “The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe.” (Berger 50) People from different generations, have known their visual world in a different sense because their knowledge is different, their resources are different, and their environment is different. The images that people use to create a visual world in which “every image embodies a way of seeing, our perception or appreciation of an image depends also upon our own way of seeing.” (Berger 52) The language of images holds a different value to individuals based on the time period that they come from. Each time period has its own unique way of seeing. In “the Middle Ages when men believed in the physical existence of Hell the sight of fire must have meant something different from what it means today. Nevertheless their idea of Hell owed a lot to the sight of fire consuming and the ashes remaining- as well as to their experiences of the pain of burns” (Berger 50). People from different time periods gave the sight of fire a different meaning, because their knowledge was different. People from different generations will think of Figure 1 (Berger 71) differently based on the time period that they come from. Older generations will make the assumption that the woman is doing her household duties as she is expected to do as a female. Today, people are much more sensitive to gender stereotypes and are more hesitant to make the assumption that a woman is just carrying out her role in the household. Now a days, people understand that men and woman can truly become whoever they want to be. Even though different generations think of their environment in different mental ways, they still illustrate conformity within the groups that they exist in. Each generation will have the same thought processes because they come from the same time period. With the language of images, individuals can become who they truly want to be but the language of images is also used to maintain conformity within groups of people. In my life, I have seen that the language of images gives me the power to succeed in my goals. In my education, I am constantly facing obstacles and these obstacles have the ability to get in the way of my path to success within my education. However, I am able to use the language of images to form a visual world around me to get over these obstacles within my education. For instance, if I get a poor grade on my Advanced Placement Biology test I recover from this grade by looking at the images around me and interpreting these images into potential resources to achieve a better grade on the next examination. Since I do this constantly in my education, I can attain educational success.
In the book, Apostles of Disunion, author Charles B. Dew opens the first chapter with a question the Immigration and Naturalization service has on an exam they administer to prospective new American citizens: “The Civil War was fought over what important issue”(4). Dew respond by noting that “according to the INS, you are correct if you offer either of the following answers: ‘slavery or states’ rights’” (4). Although this book provides more evidence and documentation that slavery was the cause of the Civil War, there are a few places where states’ rights are specifically noted. In presenting the findings of his extensive research, Dew provides compelling documentation that would allow the reader to conclude that slavery was indeed the cause for both secession and the Civil War.
Having such an image before our eyes, often we fail to recognize the message it is trying to display from a certain point of view. Through Clark’s statement, it is evident that a photograph holds a graphic message, which mirrors the representation of our way of thinking with the world sights, which therefore engages other
My father has always reminded me that religion plays a big role in one’s morals. Of course that only applies if a person is religious and has a religious background. There are a lot of religious people in this world, and if one were to ask them where their morals came from, they would say that it is based on their religion. So what is it that makes these two things so similar and distinct? Iris Murdoch, author of “Morality and Religion,” discusses how morals and religion need each other in order to work. Morals without religion is nearly impossible because; religion influences our morals, religion allows to set better morals for one’s self, and ideally morality is essentially religious.
Through the first chapter of this book the focus was primarily on the notion of controlling crime. The best way to describe crime policy used in this chapter is comparing it to a game of ‘heads I win, tails you lose’. This chapter also addresses the causes for decline in America’s
As children, we are often told stories, some of which may have practical value in the sense of providing young minds with lessons and morals for the future, whereas some stories create a notion of creativity and imagination in the child. In Karen Armstrong’s piece, “Homo Religiosus”, a discussion of something similar to the topic of storytelling could translate to the realm of religion. Armstrong defines religion as a, “matter of doing rather than thinking” (17) which she describes using an example in which adolescent boys in ancient religions, who were not given the time to “find themselves” but rather forced into hunting animals which ultimately prepares these boys to be able to die for their people, were made into men by the process of doing.
People tend to views an image based on how society say it should be they tend to interpret the image on those assumption, but never their own assumptions. Susan Bordo and John Berger writes’ an argumentative essay in relation to how viewing images have an effect on the way we interpret images. Moreover, these arguments come into union to show what society plants into our minds acts itself out when viewing pictures. Both Susan Bordo and John Berger shows that based on assumptions this is what causes us to perceive an image in a certain way. Learning assumption plays into our everyday lives and both authors bring them into reality.
“They say the criminal—far from being someone who acts for fundamental, intrinsic reasons and who lives in his own world—is actually someone acutely sensitive to his environment, who is alert to all kinds of cues, and who is prompted to commit crimes based on his perception of the world around him” (Gladwell 157). What develops from this is a completely humanistic and empathetic view of human nature. From Gladwell’s perspective, a criminal is not a personality type, just as a Good Samaritan is not either. Neither characters exist within the context of their own emotionally charged vacuum; they are instead produced by the context in which they exist. Gladwell’s narrative accounts provide real-life explanations for this phenomenon. What we observe from the example of Goetz is that while he had issues in his past that provoked him for the violent episode on the subway, the confrontation could have been avoided entirely had the environment itself had not been one infused with violence at every turn. In other words, if the environment in the subway was not infused my graffiti and litter, Goetz violent confrontation with the four teenagers would not have occurred. What this shows is not that humans are devoid of any will, but that their will can be improved by their environment through
Crime control, consisting of many elements of prevention and punishment, is a widely debated and often contentious topic. Myriad agendas occur in government and society, depending upon the kind of organizational or philosophical objective trying to be met. Political differences are present within the criminal justice system that draw upon certain models, techniques, and methods associated with crime prevention. Society functions as another element in crime control, as often an underlying fear creates a pressure to enact programs and laws. The media enters in as a forum to present conservative and liberal opinions to enact and enforce criminal laws and punishment. A debate over crime often strives to define prevention and punishment, in models that make these terms mutually exclusive, versus a view that crime prevention is a result, and punishment only one possible tool for achieving that result. Different forms of punishment will be discussed in relationship to the criminal justice system as well as the purpose the punishment serves, problems relating to the punishment, and an opinion on improvements and solutions.
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
Throughout society there are both individuals and groups of people with a wide range of perceptions about crime and justice. These perceptions are influenced by the media and what the media presents. Media presents crime stories in ways that selectively distort and manipulate public perception, thus creating a false picture of crime. Therefore the media provides us with perceptions and social constructions about our world. Firstly I will be discussing the role of the media in constructing knowledge about crime. I will begin by explaining why the media is important, and go further to explain that media representations construct knowledge of crime and since knowledge about crime is constructed it does not necessarily capture reality in fact crime stories are often sensationalised. I will then link this to my central argument that the media shapes people’s perceptions of crime and how this is important as it can lead to changes in the law. I will then explain what it is that the public or society needs to be aware of when reading and watching media reports about crime. We need to be aware of bias and moral panics that are created by the media and how the media shapes or influence’s public perception through this, it is important for us to be aware of misleading or false crime stories so that we are not swayed by the media in believing what they want us to believe.
The crux of Emile Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life lies in the concept of collective effervescence, or the feelings of mutually shared emotions. Through a hermeneutical approach, Durkheim investigates the reflexiveness of social organization, the balance between form and content, and the immense cooperation in collective representations. In his work, society is the framework of humanity and gives it meaning, whereas religion acts as the tool to explain it. Since society existed prior to the individual, the collective mind must be understood before the concept of the individual can be grasped. However, one component seems missing from his social theory – what underlies society in terms of rituals and rites? Only when this element is fleshed out can the individual be comprehended with respect to the collective conscience. One, out of many, possibilities is the often-overlooked influence of emotions. What is the connection between social functions and emotions? Perhaps emotions reify social solidarity by means of a collective conscience. Durkheim posits the notion that society shares a bilateral relationship with emotional experiences, for the emotions of collective effervescence derive from society but also produce and maintain the social construct.
I. “Crime is contagious, it can start with a broken window and spread to an entire community.” Crime is most definitely contagious, just like someone’s personal attitude. If a person has a negative attitude, other people around can reflect off of it and it can bring down their attitude. This relates closely to crime. If someone commits a crime and doesn’t get caught, others think they can do it also with the same outcome. It could be as little as jumping over turnstiles without paying, or something much bigger such as graffiti. In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay, kids were jumping over the turnstiles in the subway. When others saw what these kids were doing, they started doing the same. They thought if some people were cheating the
Symbols and images have a more than significant impact on one?s views of the world. Since childhood, a person?s brain uses representation of images into meanings to make sense of their world. These images then go on to being either the truth or falsehood and base a person?s views of the world for the rest of their life. All this can be explained through the idea of representation of everyday cultural mediums; such as advertisements and the television.
Emile Durkheim, regarded as the father of sociology, worked roughly during the same period of time as Tylor and Frazer. However, despite their timely similarities, Durkheim claims that humanity will not outgrow religion. Durkheim differs from Tylor and Frazer because he considers religion and science to have separate purposes for humanity. For this reason, he affirms that science will not be the force through which religion becomes outgrown. To explain, Durkheim suggests that unlike science, “[r]eligion’s true purpose is not intellectual, but social” (Pals: Nine Theories, 102). The social function of religion manifests itself as it “serves as the carrier of social sentiments providing symbols and rituals that enable people to express the deep
In Chapter 1 of Keith Ward’s, The Case for Religion, Ward discusses Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s concept of the term “Religion” and his definition of the term and critically responds to it. In one of Smith’s own books, The Meaning and End of Religion, he discusses both his interpretation of the term “religion” and his opinion that the term should no longer be used. Smith’s skepticism of the term, together with his attempt at defining it, creates a contradiction that Ward critically unpicks and responds to.