Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma deception vs truth
Dishonesty and its effects essay
Ethics of lying
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma deception vs truth
In the TV show “The Simpsons” there is one episode where Homer one of the main characters, finds a way of mooching cable. Such a behavior is not approved by Lissa his daughter who thinks he might go to hell for what he is doing. One of Home’s arguments when Lissa questions his behavior is: “Lissa everyone does it”. Later on, Homer is not only mooching cable, but he also is stealing work’s tools. Lying and cheating seems to be attached to the core of humans. It seems be an ability that is unconscious learned, and as time goes they get better at it. It was found that everyone lies or cheats but just a little, such a conduct seems detrimental to society because since it is the vast majority who just lies or cheats a little that ends up …show more content…
It became a good way how some humans are able to reach some of their goals in life. The popular saying: “The end justify the means” could not explain better the way how someone use cheating and lying as way to prosper in life. Some do it in a greater way, but the majority do it just a little. Dan explains that every human has the ability to be dishonest and that everyone is dishonest to a certain degree. “Everyone has the capacity to be dishonest, and almost everybody cheats just by a little”(1). Early in life people gain the ability to discern between the good and the bad. therefore humans would be always have the choice of either lie or stick to their morals if they have it. Furthermore it has been found that one the reason why people lie is to obtain a benefit. Whether that benefit is money, a better score in test, feeding our ego. This kind of behavior does not follow the traditional pattern of human behavior. That is human do not weigh the benefit of cheating versus the cost of do it. It was found that the average citizen cheats or lies to the point when do not feel culpability for what they doing because somehow they adapt their values or morals to make it seems that it is ok to cheat but just a …show more content…
Students are given 20 math problems and they must solve as many as they can. Then they reported how many they were able to solved. Many reported they were able to solve 6, but the research show that in reality they only solved 4. This results seems to be the same regardless the culture where the experiment was run on ( Bhattachjee 4). The experiment proved that most of people lie just a little. Only a few say that they were able to solve more than six, but the vast majority reported to solved 6 problems. In other words people do not feel bad about lying to a certain degree, but the majority will not do it more than just a little. They feel that is a good middle point that allows them to lie or cheat without compromising their morals and allowing them to feel “honest” even when they lie. In a different variation of the experiment, the participants were offered tokens as a rewards instead of money. It turned out that under this conditions, people cheated twice( Dan 2). This means that people do not feel as about cheating when the award were a token because they separated the ideas in their head that at least, they were not stealing money. Humans will always adjust bad behavior one way or another. It will be always the perfect excuse to justify wrong
People tend to blindly cheat to get what they want, and go about it as if it were normal. People don’t usually want to work for things if they can get it the easy way. In Stephen L. Carter’s article “The Rules about Rules”, Carter explains why Americans choose to cheat and how they don’t necessarily know right from wrong. Carter’s interpretation is accurate people do lack integrity due to having low self-esteem, and not having the courage to be different and separating themselves from the crowd.
Although it is considered wrong to tell lies, it seems that literature has offered us situations where telling lies isn’t necessarily bad. Of course, lying often has a tragic outcome, but not always for the person or people who told the lie or lies. Oftentimes, these unfortunate outcomes are directed at the person about whom the lie was told. Furthermore, these stories have explained that dishonesty can result in success for both the liar and the target. Maybe we have been teaching the wrong values to our children.
The thing that confuses me are the reasons why people cheat. I know that in college life, it is clear that grades are important. Since grades are so important, people want to do better and want to succeed in their classes that they are taking. By cheating, it makes it easier for them to get a better grade. I agree that it is not an honest thing to do, but it is clear that they are doing it for a reason, to benefit themselves. Also, people want to help their friends succeed so that is another part of it. I think if schools wanted to get rid of cheating, they should not focus on the grades as much. Grading people is important, but is it that important if everyone cheats? I also see how people want to be viewed as honest. I do not think people want to cheat because they think they will be viewed as immoral. Also, they could be punished which would hurt them as well. If everyone cheats in schools, why not just allow it? That is the way that the world is running currently and everyone is cheating their way through
The article “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant by Sissela Bok also presents the same argument. Sissela Bok presents the ideas and viewpoints of Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher. Kant believed that lying was bad and that “truthfulness is statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage.” He believed lying was always bad no matter the situation. Kant said that lying “vitiates the source of law,” or makes the source of law weaker. Our whole purpose of the government is to serve justice and if everyone is lying in court, it gets harder to serve justice. The purpose of the government would not be fulfilled if people lie. According to Kant, lying also “harms the liar himself, by destroying his human dignity and making him more worthless even than a small thing.” Kant says lying makes the liar lose his or her pride and honor. And I think it probably makes the liar feel bad and makes them feel guilty. In the article “Teens Do their Share of Lying” by Loretta Ragsdell, a quote from Sabrina, a college freshman, takes about how she lied...
When confronted with a problem, why does the human brain default to lying? Dishonesty is never a solution, although it may seem like the best option in the spur of a moment. My grandma always gave the example of her youth: she avoided and deceived her friend’s sister because the little girl riled everyone. Come to find out, the sister passed the following month due to an illness. I could never imagine the guilt she experienced. Nevertheless, everyone has been deceitful before and many characters were in the tragedy, The Crucible, by playwright Arthur Miller. Reasons for lying are understandable, but most people will admit that mendacity has only caused pain. Lying’s outcome is never positive: it may seem like a good option, for falsehood can save a person’s life, benefit someone, and it eases stress, but these are all transitory.
Stephanie Ericsson’s The Ways We Lie, analyzes and reflects on how lying has simply become the norm in our society. We all lie, there is not one person in the world that does not lie. Most people lie because they are afraid of telling the truth, however what they do not know is telling a lie can lead them in the wrong direction because many things can happen when lying to a person. The person can find out when everything unravels that person will not have trust in you and you would be known as a liar. To every action there is a consequence, so why not deal with just one consequence when telling the
When Professor John Doe assigned this reading assignment, I had really no idea what academic book would appeal to me. I definitely wanted to choose a book that would impact me in the long run and that I would benefit from. When I told my brother about the book, he said that he was just finishing a book called “The Cheating Culture, Why More Americans Are Doing More To Get Ahead” by, David Callahan. When he quickly explained what the book was about I knew that was the book I was going to read. I figured that this would be a good choice, because everywhere you look these days you see cheating. This book was published back in 2004 so even though it is a decade old, I do believe that many of the examples in the book are still problems, if not, even worse today than they were a decade ago. Weather it is kids in school, athletes, or the average business man. Everyone is cheating and trying to cut corners to get ahead. Nearly everyone has cheated in their life rather you would want to admit it or not. Reading this book, I was hoping to learn exactly why so many people try to cheat, and what alternatives people could take to prevent from cheating.
An abundant amount of people would say they try to contain honesty, however, we are all liars, no matter how hard we try. Because of the pressure from society, we all are forced to make ourselves look and feel satisfactory with the rest of society. This is not just considering students in a school setting, but also parents and those at home. My cousin
It tells us how often we lie or tend to lie under different situations and scenarios by taking real world examples. Kornet explained and analyze the result of various studies by Bella DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of Virginia and her colleagues. As lying and deception becomes an integral part of every individual, it is important to know its impact and its results on our life. We are lying about one or the other thing at almost every moment of our life. It can be at workplace, in a relationship, or even friendship. Kornet concludes this article by saying, “The ubiquity of lying is clearly a problem, but would we want to will away all of our lies? Let’s be honest.” I completely agrees with the author as we have to take a step against lying and deception and to be honest in our lives. Kornet’s article provides really good studies and after analyzing those studies one can think of his/her lying habit and how often he lies in a day. I myself tried and thinking about how many times in a day I lie, and found that I lie a number of times in a day. This article is really interesting and I encourage everyone to read this article. After reading this article, you will come to know the actual truth about lying and its
The three alternative explanations suggest that people cheat more at the end because they previous cheating opportunities have made them feel that they have earned the right to cheat, exhausted their self-control, or acclimated them to cheating. However, in this experiment the researchers decided to hold the number of previous cheating opportunities constant and manipulated the number of remaining opportunities, so they exposed two hypothesis:
“For every clever person who goes to the trouble of creating an incentive scheme, there is an army of people, clever and otherwise, who will inevitably spend even more time trying to beat it. Cheating may or may not be human nature, but it is certainly a prominent feature in just about every human endeavor. Cheating is a primordial economic act: getting more or less” (21). This quote is important because it proves how everyone has cheated once. In many cases it is true, people often cheat on tests or even on their diet. Not everyone can live up to their expectations. Some may justify it, others proudly proclaim it, and others will try denying their cheating vigorously. Most people consider cheating as a bad and unwise action. In this novel, it gave two examples of cheaters, school teachers and sumo wrestlers. It shows how both authors can take two different people and still find something similar with both of them, like cheating.
One common trait that is seen throughout all individuals, is that all of them lie or in some way deceive others or themselves. It is seen that people are constantly lying, whether it is the smallest lie or even the largest. No matter how much a person remains truthful throughout their life there is a point where he or she lies. It is inevitable to avoid, people lie to gain something, to come into power, or to even mask the truth that they do not want others to hear (Bhattacharjee 1). It is seen in the two articles “Why We Lie; We like to believe that a few bad apples spoil the virtuous bunch.
We lie all the time, lying is not something new to our culture. We lie to our parents, we lie to our friends, we even lie to our significant other, but why do we do it? There is not one set reason on why we lie but they can vary from an insignificant reason to something more nefarious. A good operational definition of a lie is “A lie is a false statement to a person or group made by another person or group who knows it is not the whole truth, intentionally.” (Freitas-Magalhães) We have been raised to know that lying is usually a bad thing, and it’s better to tell the truth, not to mention the circumstances get exponentially worse if you are caught lying. No one wants to be labeled as a liar, or untrustworthy. This may sound unorthodox but I personally think lying is perfectly fine; depending on the situation. If you have a prima-facie duty to be dishonest it’s perfectly acceptable. Ross says a prima facie duty or obligation is an actual duty. “One’s actual duty is what one ought to do all things considered.” (Carson) I’m not the only one who finds this too be true. Ross would also agree with me, He says “Lying is permissible or obligatory when the duty not to lie conflicts with a more important or equal important prima facie duty.” (Carson) As I was doing research on this topic I did read one extremely compelling argument on why we ought not to lie. Aristotle basically said a person who makes a defense for lying could never be trusted. (King.)
The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article The Cheater’s High: The Unexpected Affective Benefits of Unethical Behavior challenges this consensus and demonstrates that unethical behavior stimulates positive affect, termed “cheater’s high.” Cheating is associated with self-satisfaction, and the “high” one receives from cheating only increases with self-deception about the unethical behavior. Study 1 gauged affective predictions following unethical behavior. In Study 1a, participants were asked to predict whether they’d predict to feel positive effects after cheating on a hypothetical test that would earn them more money the more they answer correctly. Participants generally responded negative, implying that there is no predicted “cheater’s
Considering the large economic effects of dishonesty and of not being able to trust one another, we should show little tolerance for violators. Fortunately, we live in a society where we can generally trust and accept the word of one another. That’s the good news. The bad news is there’s nowhere near the level of trust and honesty there was as recently as a half-century ago.