Holocaust Museum Analysis

537 Words2 Pages

The Holocaust is one of the worst moments of time, and in the history of the world. In the article, “At the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C.”, the Article is presented in an objective way and in a subjective way. Objective, and subjective are two ways of writing. They are different because objectivity is facts giving on the article, and stating what happened, while subjectivity is more of an opinion way of writing, and it is stating other people's viewpoints of the topic. I think that the article is more of a combination of subjective and objective way of writing. It is a combination because it is giving a lot of opinions based on the article on what it was like at the museum. Also, they are giving a lot of facts on the article and what …show more content…

The most powerful effect is created by viewing the museum's exhibits. That is an objective statement because it is giving an example about the Holocaust Museum. Another reason that statement is objective is because of the word choice. For example, the word powerful, that gives a tone to make it sound more scary and showing that is was a bad time back then. Another example is the word echo, that gives a tone that is more of a creepy, and eerie time. Another example of objectivity in the story, “At Holocaust Museum” is, “The first phase of the Final Solution involved herding Jews into "ghettos," where they were isolated from the non-Jewish population.” That is an objective statement because it is using a fact to show the setting of the holocaust. Another reason why that is an objective statement is the word choice, where the author used to show what happened back then, the first example is the word herded. That word shows that that they were being forced into uncomfortable places that were making it a hard

Open Document