The experiments done on African American children were drug experiments—like fenfluramine— in order to correlate aggressiveness to serotonin levels. The children that were selected for this study were black boys who were physically and mentally healthy. Other experiments done were brain surgery and lobotomy. For example, James Marion Sims punctured parietal bones so that he could move them to other positions (115). My thoughts on Harriet A. Washington was that she represented great ideas and represented various cases as to the history behind African Americans and the torture they went through. Washington clearly educates her readers on the past about American medicine that many people do not know about. She educates people about the abusive upraising of my scientific information known in present days and products that everyone uses. …show more content…
My thought on what happened at the Holmesburg Prison was that I found that the experiments done on prisoners in order to gain more research study were pretty outrageous.
I thought it was cruel that they manipulated these prisoners and gave them long-term behavioral problems, such as nausea, paralysis, and helplessness. For example, one of the Holmesburg victims—Jesse Williams—experienced abuse by “physicians and technicians had rubbed acid into his scrotum until skin fell away—all for three dollars a session” (244). Holmesburg Prison experiments occurred during 1962-1968 and tested 153 experimental drugs on victims in the prison. These prisoners were inoculated with herpes, vaccinia, and viruses. Based on the research files, there was not an indication of them and the uprisings of drugs preformed were also
hidden. Researchers should be allowed to perform on prisoners, as long as they have their consent. Although some prisoners are not mentally and physically stable enough, if they are willing to be apart of the experiment, they should be allowed to do so. However, when performing the experiment on them, there should be ethical implications taken into count. Some ethical implications of experiments include “voluntary/informed consent, the right to withdraw from the study at any time, protection of privacy and well-being, and protection from physical, emotional, and mental harm” (411). My thoughts on using human subjects in various research is that it is okay as long as the there is consent from the person. My reasoning is because in order to find cures, studies, and research, human experimentations need to be done in order to be accurate on how it affects humans or how the human body works. What better way to find out about the human body—how it looks and reacts—then to look at the human body itself. Experimentations on the human body represent the most accurate information and data. Research is justifiable only when ethical guidelines are distinct for that experimentation. Although research is important for new-flowing knowledge and gain a better society, ethical guidelines have to be set in place because ethical guidelines secure the person’s well-being and safety. Ethical guidelines give humans the right to drop out at anytime and have the privacy that they need. Research studies do not all have racial/ethnic bias inherited. The inherited bias is completely up to the researcher. For example, experiments recruited black children, stigmatized black children and had racial motives (54). Because blacks are small relative to the rest of the American population, the blacks are stigmatized. Depending on how the researcher approaches different ethnic groups, the reason behind how the researcher is going to approach different groups he wishes to tackle and favor to experiment on, is based on stigmatizing.
In the Earley book, the author started to talk about the history of mental illness in prison. The mentally ill people were commonly kept in local jails, where they were treated worse than animals. State mental hospitals were typically overcrowded and underfunded. Doctors had very little oversight and often abused their authority. Dangerous experimental treatments were often tested on inmates.
In 1932, in the area surrounding Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama, the United States Public Health Service (PHS) and the Rosenwald Foundation began a survey and small treatment program for African-Americans with syphilis. Within a few months, the deepening depression, the lack of funds from the foundation, and the large number of untreated cases provided the government’s researchers with what seemed to be an unprecedented opportunity to study a seemingly almost “natural” experimentation of latent syphilis in African-American men. What had begun as a “treatment” program thus was converted by the PHS researchers, under the imprimatur of the Surgeon General and with knowledge and consent of the President of Tuskegee Institute, the medical director of the Institute’s John A. Andrew Hospital, and the Macon County public health officials, into a perspective study-The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male (Jones1-15). Moreover, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which began in 1932 and was terminated in 1972 by the protest of an enraged public, constituted the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history. Since the premise on which the experiment was based did not involve finding a cure or providing treatment, the question then remains why did the study begin and why was it continued for four decades?
In summary, Harriet has done too many things for families like mine to not be considered a hero in my eyes. She has walked through freezing cold, hungry and tired, but has never faltered on her journeys. She has sacrificed her own safety and well-being several times for the helpless and imprisoned, yet she never stopped her travels. She has constantly persevered through danger, prejudice, and legal limitations; even up North. For these reasons,
In an ordinary prison, many are at risk of being assaulted especially within weaker inmates. These prisoners who assault and frequently act out in violence, as well as prisoners who try to escape, “must be removed from the general population of the prison environment while they threaten any of those behaviors” (Riveland, 1999). While these prisoners are in the super-maximum security prison, they are not placed out of it until it is believed their threat level is low. Other inmates of supermax prions include: death row inmates, mentally-ill inmates, and inmates with HIV or other blood disease. These inmates are placed in supermax prisons to secure inmates from those who are likely to act out in rage, and to be sure the health of inmates is not at risk by getting HIV. Many see these reasons to be a necessary condition to place these inmates in a different and confined prison. However others see the supermax prisons as being a cruel punishment. When given this argument, many may agree that having prisoners, especially smaller and weaker inmates, around these violent offenders is dangerous. Would it be cruel and unusual to leave these inmates in a cell where they are at risk of being tortured by a mentally unstable or unfit cell mate? Many other might see that it is a fit punishment and it would prevent the abused inmates from becoming repeating offenders. Which would bring up the idea that these inmates
The Tuskegee Study, as exampled in the film “Miss Evers’ Boys,” was a horrendous example of the result of racism, a vulnerable population, and the manipulation of people not given the proper dignity they deserved, to benefit the majority class (Woodard). According to the film, in this study a whole community of African Americans went decades with identified cases of syphilis, being given placebo interventions and unjustifiably told that a later recognized intervention of penicillin shots were too risky for their use. Why would they do this? To gain knowledge; and they viewed the study as a “pure” scientific experiment, a human trial that would likely never be acceptable to have been conducted on Whites of the time, and under the full knowledge and aid of the U.S. government (Woodard, “Miss Evers’ Boys”).
Harriet Tubman is an important figure in American history. She is remembered for her work as an abolitionist, respected for the risks she took helping the Union Army during the Civil War, as well as honored for the lasting gifts she left behind for the people of her country. Harriet Tubman may be considered a hero by many men and women, for her example of bravery and self-sacrifice is inspiring people of all races.
Torture, for weeks, for months, for years, but it is somehow plausible to consider it help. The sane being shoved into a psych ward, drugged, and forced with erroneous treatments, yet this is regarded as the panacea? Mental institutes do not solve everyone’s problems. Forced treatment on the resistive or illegitimate mentally ill exemplifies the need to regain civil rights for patients. The current laws applied to the topic remain not enough to withhold these patients’ civil rights. Also, patients bias court cases while influenced by prescribed drugs. The stories and results of these foul acts are tremendously horrifying. As Americans we are born with our civil rights therefore these persons deserve justice.
During her time, women were expected to stay at home and take care of her house and children. Going out and being an active member of society just wasn’t something women did. She opened doors for many women by being a trailblazer in the medical field. She never had kids or a husband because she believed that the soldiers were her children. A family could have hindered her success and ability to travel to battlefields. She wouldn’t have been able to risk her life every day knowing she had a family that needed her. There is still the stigma that women “need” to have children. She didn’t follow that stigma and showed that women don’t have to have children to have a fulfilled life. She filled her life the way she wanted to not how everyone else wanted her
...Her feats were truly remarkable; most would not be willing to try any given the chance. Many looked up to Harriet, as countless still do. Her name will live on for many, many years to come.
Medical research in the United States has a disgraceful history of exploitative studies in which African Americans were targets of abuse in the name of medical and scientific progress. African Americans have been used as the testing ground for drugs, treatments, and procedures since the time of slavery. The tolerance of the human frame and the endurance of the soul have been pushed to the limit in many of these experiments. From the physical demands on plantation work and the torturous treatment of slavery to the mental anguish inflicted on a slave’s soul by their masters, blacks have received deplorable treatment sanctioned by a white society. The end of slavery and the ushering in of the twenty first century did not end the torturous treatment and mental abuse. African Americans have been used for medical experimentation without consent for decades. Ironically they are treated as inferior and often given fewer rights than others, but amazingly their cells and bodies are treated as equals in laboratories for medical research, the results of which can save, extend and enhance the lives of others. Although color lines that are drawn in many aspects of life and inequitable treatment doled out based on the depth of the color of one’s skin, actually astounding results from medical experimentation on African Americans has produced drugs, cures and treatments for even those who do not value people of color, leaving the question of ethics and equity hanging in the balance.
To say Harriet Tubman was a good women is the understatement of the century. Not only did Tubman help over three hundred slaves escape to freedom she also supported women rights. She had an amazing heart and deserves to be remembered.
... she addressed many problems of her time in her writings. She was an inspirational person for the feminism movements. In fact, she awoke women’s awareness about their rights and freedom of choice. She was really a great woman.
In her time Period women didn’t have rights as a religious dissenter or any type of political stand point. . She was clearly a great leader in the cause of religious toleration in America and the advancement of women in society. She basically challenged men and their authority, which was a struggle and hassle to overcome without being killed, but she did. By conducting informal...
What an incredible woman! Harriet¹s diligence to do right, and her determination to keep with it until her purpose was fulfilled, still inspires me today. I do admire Martin Luther King, Jr. and many other abolitionists, but not as much as Harriet Tubman. I don¹t know of any other woman that accomplished as much as she did, in one lifetime. Harriet Tubman truly is the ultimate hero of the abolition movement.
Learning about the struggles and hardship Harriet has had to see is heart wrenching. Reading about all that she has done coming from a place of severe suffering is empowering and of course inspirational, she has taught me to always believe that the grass is greener on the other side. Harriet has changed my thinking by implanting the idea in my mind to never give up, she's also taught me to challenge authority and keep my morals close. Without Harriet's influence the world we live in may be very different, she advanced relations between African Americans and the Military along with the government and changed the world. She has touched millions of hearts, America is forever in debt to her. I had seen Mr. Montrose at the park for years, but it wasn't until I learned about Mr. Montrose's past that I began to see him as a hero. I also learned to consider the importance of appreciating people's history. Talking with Mr. Montrose is what inspired me to apply for a position at the VA hospital.