Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
General case analysis
Supreme court cases criminal justice
Case analysis and problem solving
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: General case analysis
MILLERSBURG — Confronted with additional evidence against himself, a Killbuck man on Thursday admitted to having consensual sex with a 14-year-old girl. David A. Phillips, 29, formerly of 151 ½ S. Main St., pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to one count each of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, disseminating matter harmful to juveniles and contributing to the unruliness or delinquency of a minor. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss one additional charge of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, one count of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material or performance and two more counts of disseminating matter harmful to juveniles. While Phillips faced up to seven years in prison, Judge Robert Rinfret accepted and adopted a jointly recommended …show more content…
sentence of 18 months in prison. In discussing the issue with Phillips, Rinfret noted, the law exists to prevent predators from having even consensual sex with minors.
“I have three daughters, thank God they didn't have Facebook (as teens),” said Rinfret. His admonishment was interrupted by Phillips, who used profanity to express his dissatisfaction with the law. The offer, including the sentencing recommendation, was made with the understanding there is a risk any time a case goes to trial, according to Holmes County Prosecutor Sean Warner, explaining some of the evidence could have been confusing to a jury. A plea, he said, also eliminates the reliance on testimony of a 14-year-old girl who was “not thrilled to tell strangers about her sexual experiences.” The girl was well-informed of and in complete agreement with the state's offer, according to victim advocate Andy Zedella. From Phillips' perspective, defense attorney Jeff Kellogg said, “The state provided evidence just recently that I couldn't challenge.” The evidence — Facebook correspondence between Phillips and the girl — was reviewed with Phillips, who, just days prior to the scheduled start of a trial, elected to accept the deal, said
Kellogg. The Holmes County Sheriff's Office launched an investigation on Nov. 30 after Holmes County Job and Family Services received two calls in which Phillips was identified as a suspect in allegations of sexual misconduct with children. During the investigation, Detective Sgt. Jim Henry said he became aware of allegations Phillips had exchanged a series of photo messages with a juvenile girl. Photos shared between the two allegedly depicted each in various stages of nudity. It also was suggested Phillips took the same 14-year-old girl out of the county, where they allegedly engaged in sex twice, between April 26 and Aug. 15, according to Henry. Confronted about the allegations, the girl admitted to not only exchanging photos with Phillips, but having consensual sexual intercourse with him, said Henry, noting, Ohio law prohibits anyone under the age of 16 from consenting to sex. Two others confirmed observing the Phillips and the girl engaging in sexual activity; however, Phillips denied not only the allegations, but denied knowing the girl at all, said Henry. As a consequence of his conviction, Phillips was identified as a Tier II sex offender, subjecting him to 25 years of registration as such.
Judge Fahey felt that affidavits provided by Dascoli’s mother and ex- girlfriend in support of Dascoli were weak and insubstantial, as well as not credible given the fact the defendant had the opportunity to advise Kelly of first aggressor evidence failed to do so. Additionally, in reference to an affidavit written by a medical expert, Fahey states that his conclusion was “without sufficient factual basis, and is, at best, conjecture and
...t his the evidence in front of a jury. Still believing in his innocence Jeff is filing for parole after fourteen years of eligibility. He is hoping to meet parole board criteria so he can be released on parole.
Your honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, thank you for your attention today. [Slide #2] I would like to assert that separation is not the end of a relationship. Divorce is not the end of a relationship. Even an arrest is not the end of a relationship. Only death is the end of a relationship. In the case of defendant Donna Osborn, her insistence that ‘“one way or another I’ll be free,”’ as told in the testimony of her friend Jack Mathews and repeated in many others’, indicates that despite the lack of planning, the defendant had the full intent to kill her husband, Clinton Osborn.
Throughout the trial, defense attorneys attempted to argue Salvi was suffering from psychological disorders that would make him incompetent for trial. Ultimately, however Salvi was found competent to stand trial. After reading Salvi’s full psychiatric interview, the official court transcript of the four-day competency hearing, and the day-to-day summary; I have come to agree that the defendant, John Salvi was competent to stand trial.
The juvenile case of Ricky Smith was brought to the attention of the Michigan Juvenile Court as he had been initially referred for truancy. However, his probation had been extended due to Mr. Smith being found driving a stolen vehicle. According to People v. Smith (1991), Mr. Smith was referred to the juvenile court again for riding a bicycle while under the influence of alcohol and for stealing candy bars. The juvenile court, again, chose to extend Mr. Smith’s probation, even though he had clearly demonstrated non-compliance with the rules of his probation by continuing to accrue delinquent charges. An additional report was filed with the court alleging that Mr. Smith had violated the terms of his probation due to a curfew infraction and threatened an officer. It appears that the Assistant District Attorney in the case attempted to have Mr. Smith’s case transferred to adult criminal court after he had been charged with stealing a woman’s purse. However, the court denied the request to do so. After the denial, Mr. Smith was sentenced to a boy’s reform school. He absconded from the facility and was listed as a runaway until he was found later, as an adult, with pending adult charges.
have a great chance of wining the case, but he tried to do the best that he could to prove
The appeal was filed based on the fact that Smith’s presentence investigation report(PSIR) revealed that he had an extensive juvenile record which included a history of at least twelve offenses. Smith argued that he was entitled to resentencing under MCR 5.913, rewritten as MCR 5.925(E). The information in the PSIR was supposed to be automatically expunged pursuant to former MCR 5.913(People v. Smith, 2016). The Court of Appeals considered two panels of discussion before deciding in favor of the
Joseph A. Kahrig, 26, whose last known address was 348 Derr Ave., Apt. B, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to theft and forgery.
The remaining 12 including Michael Pitts, Sharon Davis-Williams, Tamara Cotman, Donald Bullock, Dana Evans, Tabeeka Jordan, Diane Buckner-Webb, Pamela Cleveland, Theresia Copeland, Angela Williamson, Dessa Curb and Shari Robinson chose not to accept the plea bargain. Only one of the defendants, Dessa Curb, was acquitted while the remaining 11 were convicted of a variety of charges, including racketeering, false swearing and false statements. Prior to sentencing, Judge Baxter again urged remaining defendants to strike a plea bargain. The pleas being offered were: Michal Pitts, Sharon Davis-Williams and Tamara Cotman: a 5-year sentence that would include 1 year of time served weekends only, the rest would be probation and a $10,000 fine; Donald Bullock, Dana Evans, and Tabeeka Jordan’s: 6 months in jail to be served on weekends and a $5,000 fine; Diane Buckner-Webb, Pamela Cleveland, Theresia Copeland and Angela Williamson: 1-year home confinement and $1,000 fine. Shari Robinson’s plea information was not noted. All of the pleas came with the stipulation that the defendants could not appeal. Only 2 of the defendants, Donald Bullock and Pamela Cleveland, chose the plea bargain; they received sentences that involved house arrest or weekend jail
year old and serves two years in juvenile hall while if an African American boy committed this
D) Three days after his plea Ray hire a new attorney and filed a motion to renounce the plea
Naz made a series of poor and rushed decisions that led him to be convicted in a murder case in the first place. There are much evidence shows that Naz is the murderer. He has committed other crimes such as, stealing his father’s cab, taking drugs, taking a knife from a crime scene, not reporting the crime, and resisting arrest. Despite all the crimes he admitted, there is a necessity of finding other certain evidence that supports his claims. Another challenge to make the decision whether to take the plea deal or not is the influence of people around Naz. For illustration, his lawyer, Crowe, advised him to take the deal. Also, his previous lawyer, Stone, advised him as well to take the deal rather than depend on what the jury will decide. Also, one of Naz's follow inmates advised him to take the deal. All these advice could have influenced him to follow their opinion and ignore the truth. On the other hand, Chandra’s answer to Naz’s question was a challenge to take the deal because she said that if she did not kill the lady, she won’t take the
A judgment of acquittal should be granted against the United State’s case. The government contends that Ken Stringfellow has committed perjury pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1623(a). However, Mr. Stringfellow repudiated his previous inaccurate declarations during the grand jury proceedings. Therefore, as a result, under § 1623(d), the government is barred from prosecuting Mr. Stringfellow for his prior statements before his recantation. Moreover, the government was successful in its indictment against the defendant’s father Mr. Weed Townsend for illegal possession of child pornography. Mr. Townsend is awaiting extradition from Switzerland to answer for the allegations charged against him. For the reason above, Mr. Stringfellow
Ryan, G., Leversee, T. and Lane, S. 2014. Juvenile Sexual Offending: Causes, Consequences, and Correction. [online] Available at: http://books.google.ca/books?isbn=0470646942 [Accessed: 14 Mar 2014].
She explained that his involvement in the crime was not excessive and that it was his brother who was the leader. She went on to describe his eight previous arrests for crimes like robbery and cocaine possession. Given his long history she said she was not surprised to see him involved in this kind of case. Because of his other charges I thought the prosecutor was going to suggest the higher end of the sentencing guidelines. However, as she continued I realized I was incorrect. Instead of focusing on his previous crimes she talked about how he needed rehabilitation. She emphasized recovery from his current lifestyle more than sending him to prison again. She brought up his involvement in his church and his successful marriage and questioned why he would throw all of that away. She also suggested that he turn to his church and his wife for support and to aid him in his battle with addiction. Throughout the case, the prosecutor was compassionate and seemed more like a disappointed parent to the defendant rather than angry. The one time the prosecutor did act somewhat harsh was towards the middle of her statement. She brought up the fact that the defendant had previous medical conditions such as a stab and shot wounds. She suggested that the defense had asked for these injuries to be taken into account when the sentence was decided on. She was adamant that the court should not take