Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems in intercultural relations
Collectivism vs individualism
Issues of intercultural communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Problems in intercultural relations
So far as international business is concerned, there are various different approaches in intercultural issue, and the theory of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions is one of the most popular one. Cultural awareness is a main factor leading to the success of a business and lack of it can lead to their failures. Hofstede (1983) pointed out the importance of management a nationality for at least 3 reasons: political, sociological and psychological as these factors affects any issues in our life. Another well-worth mention is that all cultural reflects and common ways of thinking are rooted in the common culture but may be different for other cultures. It also figures out that characterizing a national culture did not mean that every individual within …show more content…
To analyze a national culture, Hofstede identified four dimensions which represents differently among national cultures, including individualism versus collectivism, large or small power distance, strong or weak uncertainty avoidance and masculinity versus femininity. The first dimensions ‘individualism versus collectivism’ is on the question whether people likely to live alone or belong to a knitted network, which later on shown that wealthy countries are more individualist while poor and developing countries are more collectivist. It is noticeable that Japan, India, Austria and Spain are in the middle. The second dimension ‘Power distance’ defines how society deals with the inequality. However, it is clear that no countries could reach completely equality as human mind still perpetuate existing inequalities. At organizational level, power distance dimension describes the degree of centralization of authority and the degree of autocratic leadership; it also shows a close relationship between power …show more content…
In terms of leadership, individualism and power distance play a key role to determine the leadership style. For instance, in the United States, the core leadership theory is about leading individuals based on their needs while the leadership theory in collectivist countries is a group phenomenon with businessmen try to bring trust and loyalty to the workplace. Furthermore, higher power distance countries likely lead autocratically while subordinates in individualistic countries are able to influence their leader. When it comes to organizational level, power distance and uncertainty avoidance are the decisive dimensions of culture, as the organization is a hierarchy power system and they always try to avoid uncertainty. Additionally, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity versus femininity dimensions are related to the theory of motivation. In the United States, for instance, the motivation is supposed to stem from their needs to fulfill their needs, with a risky willingness (weak uncertainty avoidance) and a need to assert oneself
According to Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, Mexico has high scores of Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Masculinity. We can tell from the scores that Mexico is a hierarchical society that people tend to work and live in orders, which means that there are levels among people and they try to fit into their own positions; people try to avoid unknowns and unwilling to take risks; and gap of values between men and women does exist in Mexico, competition, achievement, and success are emphasized in this society so people want to be the best instead of liking what they do. With low scores of Individualism and Long-term Orientation, Mexico is considered a collectivistic society with a normative culture. It emphasizes loyalty and strong relationships
Comparing the cultural dimensions of the United States with Guatemala’s the two biggest contrasting dimensions are power distance and uncertainty avoidance. The other dimension that has some kind of lesser comparison contrasting is individualism. Guatemalan’s score high when it pertains to power distance, which means that their individual’s societies are not equal as compared to the United States. Guatemala score high depicts a society that believes that iniquities amongst people are simple the way of life. The score addresses the cultural power by groups or individuals at a given time mandating the way of life. The power dimension reflects on their low score in individualism, which is explained by power related basis of groups or individuals.
Leadership can be defined as the method in which one influences a group of individuals for a common goal. There have many great leaders in the world but these leaders are not born leaders. One must have willpower and the desire to become an effective leader. These leaders become dependent upon based upon their abilities and their success. A leader is looked upon for guidance and the inspiration to know what the right thing to do is. The theoretical foundations of the research of leadership are firmly supported. To better understand the foundations and understand the focus of leadership, it is essential to have knowledge of the history of leadership, the meaning and concept of leadership, types of leaders and leadership styles, and issues in leadership such as issues with culture and gender. According to Antonakis (2004), “leadership researchers have struggled for most of the last century to put together an integrated, theoretically cohesive view of the nature of leadership, invariably leading to disappointment in those who studied it” (p.4). An overview of the history of leadership is necessary to understand the concept of leadership because it also provides a framework for other areas of leadership. In any conventional group, individuals fill different role and one of those roles must the leader which is essential for the group to achieve it purposes.
Constant technological and global changes create challenges that forces leaders to manage different cultures in different countries. People, goods, services, and ideas are moving today at greater speeds which mean our labor force is becoming more diverse and multicultural by the day. Effective leaders need to understand such global dynamics in order to successfully manage organizational cultures. The cultures of leaders and their core assumptions might be different from the values and assumptions of employees in a different country. Two managers working for the same global company might see things differently due to their backgrounds and cultural values. The different countries, in which the organization operates, will have different cultures depending on the social, economic, and political history of the country. Managing and understanding these differences need an effective cross-cultural thinking leader (Yukl, 2013). Some research questions that Yukl, 2013 suggests are: 1) how behavior differs across cultural values and for different countries? 2) How values and behaviors are influenced by personality across company and country? 3) What types of traits, skills, and experience are most useful to prepare a leader being assigned to a new country? 4) How does the fast-changing culture in developing countries affect and relate to
Hofstede has identified five different cultural dimensions. These dimensions include power-distance, individualism/collectivism, masculinity/femininity, uncertainty avoidance and lastly long term orientation. According to Hofstede, power distance is the first dimension which translates to how all individuals in a society aren't equal and there is a decent amount of inequality when it comes to the division of power. The second dimension involves the theme of individualism which translates to the degree of interdependence as well as how we identify ourselves in terms of "I" or "We". Additionally, Hofstede states that in individualist societies we tend to look only after ourselves and our blood family, however, in collectivistic societies individuals identify themselves as part of groups and take care of each other in exchange for loyalty. The third dimension would be masculinity/ femininity. A high score would translate to a masculine culture which demonstrates a culture driven by competition, achievement and success. On the other hand, a low score which demonstrates a feminine culture shows that the dominant traits involves caring for others and quality of life. The fourth dimension involves uncertainty avoidance which translates to how a society deals with not knowing how the future is going to turn out. This amount of vagueness brings about anxiety and different cultures deal with this issue differently. The fifth and final cultural dimension according to Hofstede is long term orientat...
r this paper, I chose the country Ireland. Ireland has the highest individualism economic dimension. The first dimension is power distance that deals with individuals in a society are not equal. Power distance is defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally (Central Intelligence Agency, 2015). Ireland is at the lower ranking of power distance. Ireland citizens believe that inequalities among people should be minimized in a society. Superiors are always accessible and individual employees are reliable on their expertise in the workplace. Information in Irish companies is shared and consulted frequently, but information can be informal.
Cultural Differences in Hofstede’s Six Dimensions According to Professor Geert Hofstede, dimensionalizing a culture requires a complex analysis of a multitude of categories including differing nations, regions, ethnic groups, religions, organizations, and genders. Hofstede defines culture as "the collective programming of the mind distinguishing the members of one group or category of people from another". Throughout his many years of contribution as a social scientist, he has conducted arguably the most comprehensive study of how values in the workplace are influenced by culture, leading to the establishment of the Six Dimensions of National Culture. From this research model, the dimensions of Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long Term Orientation, and Indulgence are defined according to their implication on individual countries, which when comparatively examined provide a broad understanding of cultural diversity as it relates to the workplace. Identification and Definition of the Six Dimensions In initially defining each of Hofstede's dimensions, a foundational understanding of the six categories is established, from which a greater understanding of different cultures can be built off of.
In the article, Cultural constraints in management theories, Geert Hofstede examines business management around the globe from a cultural perspective. He explains how he believes there are no universal practices when it comes to management and offers examples from the US, Germany, France, Japan, Holland, China and Russia. He demonstrates how business management theories and practices are very much subject to cultural norms and values and by understanding these differences, it can give managers an advantage in global business practices.
Basically, Hofstede’s cultural dimension is divided into five dimensions along which national culture could be described: power distance (PDI), individualism-collectivism (IDV), masculinity-femininity (MAS), uncertainty avoidance (UAI) and long-term orientation versus short-term normative orientation (LTO).
The Hofstede model of national culture differences, based on research carried out in the early seventies, is the first major study to receive worldwide attention. This influential model of cultural traits identifies five dimensions of culture that help to explain how and why people from various cultures behave as they do. According to Hofstede (1997) culture is Ù[ collective programming of the mind? This referring to a set of assumptions, beliefs, values and practices that a group of people has condoned as a result of the history of their engagements with one another and their environment over time. In this study, culture refers to a set of core values and behavioural patterns people have due to socialisation to a certain culture. The author̼ theoretical framework will be applied to compare differing management practices in China and the West. The five measurements of culture identified by the author are:
Some of the business expert also suggested that cross- national differences are diminishing because the advancement of technology, including the day-to day activities of multinational corporations(Flora,Chiang&Birtch,Thomas,2006). This type of view point casts a doubt on how much of influence that national culture of a country wields on the multinational corporations especially in the management practices, and employee attitudes towards reward practices in particular. Geet Hofstede have distinguished national culture with four bi-polar dimensions: masculinity-feminity,individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance. Hofstede view that cultural – influence attributes of a nation do exist and these distinctions will provide and organization with further understanding on how work related values and behavior are different between cultures. In the reward- system area, Hofstede give a useful view into how employee needs and reward preferences are likely to be vary in different cultures(Flora,Chiang&Birtch,Thomas,2006). When a culture of a country score high on masculinity-femininity, this suggests there are divisions of roles and values between genders. Its shows that masculinity cultures are emphazing assertiveness, achievement and material success, an interest in acquiring huge sum of money for financial gain and achieving material success are highly desirable. The view is very different in feminine driven culture. In feminine driven culture human relationship are more value. Their culture is center more around concern for others, supporting each other’s and good quality of life. An example are financial and power oriented rewards will be more preferred in Hong Kong, China than in Finland; where relationship -and
Tylor has pointed out that "culture is complex whole which includes knowledge, beliefs, art, morals, laws, customs and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society". According to this definition, it is easy to know that every nation has different cultural preferences, national tastes and value standards. These factors impact on every part of management in multinat...
Of the dimensions of culture presented by Hofstede, power distance (and its corresponding versus of egalitarianism) has been chosen to be discussed. The understanding of what the power distance index is in reference to U.S. culture is the tendency to equate power (those who have it and those who do not) with one’s relative position (in a culture) to that of another. In other words, it is a form of ranking decided by the perceived amount of power one individual may possess in excess to another. This is not referring to whether a person is physically stronger than another (though it can); it is, rather, referring to how individuals interact with the perception of who is more or less equal to themselves. In the case of U.S. culture, this country
According to Geert Hofstede, power distance defines the levels of inequality that exists between individuals. This is the group that a particular country regards as normal. This dimension provides that all the societies are unequal, and they range from the relatively equal to the extremely uneven. This dimension also measures the levels of acceptance dictated by the powerful people in distinct cultures (Hofstede, 2010). High power distance exhibiting cultures demonstrate centralized authorities that have an impression that the management is paternalistic, and the culture accepts the hierarchical managements regarding nobility.
Some situations may work in one of the business may actually fail to work in others situations. Each situation demands the best leadership styles to be employed in the firm. There are various business styles which need to be applied in different business situations. The situation in a business is normally having a greater effect on a leader actions which he or she takes as opposed to the personal traits possessed. This is due to the fact that, while personalities may have an inspiring firmness over a period of time, they have slight reliability across business situations. This makes some scholars to argue that process theory of leadership is better than the trait theory of leadership. In most cases, power in the business is misused and this leads to negative impacts to the business and those