Historical Analysis Of Kurt Vonnegut's 'Slaughterhouse Five'

1191 Words3 Pages

when the reliability of its historical descriptions was brought into question. Irving wrote that the bombing killed more than 135,000 people in less than twelve hours, but later research concluded that the bombing killed roughly 25,000, though Irving refused to believe that figure (Evans 1). Further inconsistencies within the book reveal that Irving used German propaganda to estimate his figures (Evans 4). Irving also used misconstrued, unreliable pieces of evidence from a single witness, Hans Voigt, to write elements of the book, instead of gathering accurate information that could create a dependable nonfiction book (Evans 2). The lack of attention to historical accuracy of important details discredits the entire book as a work of nonfiction
Discrepancies in the overall picture of the bombing between Vonnegut’s firsthand experiences as a Dresden bombing survivor and historical fact is due to the common PTSD effect on the brain that leaves trauma victims with a memory dysfunction and is also a result of using the inaccurate nonfiction book, The Destruction of Dresden, by David Irving as a source for factual data in Slaughterhouse Five. The deliberately inserted effects of trauma on Billy Pilgrim throughout Slaughterhouse Five are observable through Vonnegut’s initial creation of the Tralfamadorians, as Billy chooses to use his abduction and experience of all tenses of time at once as a distraction from his traumatic memory of Dresden, skipping around through his memories to indirectly relive the disturbing bombing. The phrase “so it goes” is utilized to understate the upsetting tasks and choices Billy is forced to make in the war and bombing, justifying any unfair collateral damage as a simple fact of life. Billy believes that the cycle of life includes paramount negativity amidst any happy memories, accepting a lackluster and monotonous view of life, one he adopts after experiencing the bombing. Vonnegut’s outlook on life is similar to Billy’s, as he continues to use Billy as persona for himself. These proven examples of the lasting effect of the trauma of the bombing of Dresden allow the assumption that Vonnegut uses Billy Pilgrim’s character as a way to cope with his personal trauma confirms that the line between author and character is significantly blurred throughout the novel, although sometimes deliberate, as the autobiographical elements of the novel influence and meld

Open Document