Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Langston hughes contributions
The importance of learning rhetoric
Langston Hughes efforts for the civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Langston hughes contributions
How is language being used to change the aspect of an intended audience?
In the article, “ Hillary Clinton’s concession speech for the 2016 presidential speech election,” published by Katie Reilly, she interviews and reports Tim Kaine’s opinion about Clinton’s speech, is being delivered in the convention center of New York City. In regards to Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the presidential election, her supporters were in awe about the outcome in her presidential campaign loss. In which apparently Reilly, intends to persuade by her use of informative language, and interviewing a republican, which maintains a very empowering feminist perspective. Its main purpose of Reilly’s article is to inform and persuade by the diction that is being used in one of Clinton’s political campaigns.
Throughout the beginning of Reilly’s article, she explains the way “This is painful and it will be for a long time,”
…show more content…
It is an amazing accomplishment. I’m proud of Hillary Clinton because, in the words of Langston Hughes, she’s “held fast to dreams.” As Reilly, uses parallelism, throughout her article, in order to portray someone's perspective in the society which is being silenced due to their gender. As she says, “ amazing accomplishment,” it is being repeated because most women are amazed that women like Hillary, made a huge accomplishment, portraying that women are leaders.No other women, like her have taken the risk of facing anti-feminist, who will do anything to bring her down. Although the language in Hillary Clinton’s speeches is very strong and convincing, her gender has caused her the prevention of taking a leadership role. Not only that, but she also intends to include an allusion to Langston Hughes, in which in the political world allusions are used help show their understanding to persuade others that made an impact in
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Trump, lacking political experience, is “thin-skinned” and is a “non-precedent” president. The article on the Women’s March not only addresses Trump insulting women, but the importance of a call to action. Describing Trump, words like “impetuous,” “thin-skinned,” and “trouble” begin to build the support for the movement and how Trump is far from precedent. By using rhetorical questions, the writer juxtaposes the loss in the election to the loss of a loved one. In both situations, a person is faced with various emotions and ideas. However, Trumps inauguration set off a movement through, not only the county, but across the
The plot of the book, Speak is that Melinda Sordino, a freshman at Merryweather High went to an end of the summer party with some of her friends. Things take a turn for the worst when a senior named Andy Evans sexually assaults her at the party without her friends knowing about it. Melinda is frightened, afraid, and does not know what to do so she calls 911 busting the party, and causing her friends and everyone at that school to hate her, even if they don’t know her.
To summarize this analysis, Hillary Clinton shows us how as we unite, the stronger our bond is. She uses clever ways to show this action. Though she did not win this presidential election, she is still loved by many. She helped herself because of the way she wrote and persuaded people to join her. Using rhetorical appeals
It is very common among the United States’ political sphere to rely heavily on T.V. commercials during election season; this is after all the most effective way to spread a message to millions of voters in order to gain their support. The presidential election of 2008 was not the exception; candidates and interest groups spent 2.6 billion dollars on advertising that year from which 2 billion were used exclusively for broadcast television (Seelye 2008.) Although the effectiveness of these advertisements is relatively small compared to the money spent on them (Liasson 2012), it is important for American voters to think critically about the information and arguments presented by these ads. An analysis of the rhetoric in four of the political campaign commercials of the 2008 presidential election reveals the different informal fallacies utilized to gain support for one of the candidates or misguide the public about the opposing candidate.
On May 2, 2016 Jill Filipovic wrote an article in the New York Times that addresses the topic of women in power and how women can be at a disadvantage due to the fact that they just simply are not a man. Filipovic started her article by addressing the topic of race and how Representative Donna Edwards was accused of playing the race card during her election. In todays society many women have a hard time getting hired, trusted to execute a role, or even getting paid less by companies. Due to these issues many women such as Hillary Clinton is now being accused of “playing the women card” in her debates for presidency. The purpose of this piece of rhetoric is to argue that women are not just “playing the woman card” but that discrimination
Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton.
2016 was a disappointing year for many Americans. This was majorly due to the presidential election and Donald Trump’s unexpected victory. The habitants of this country fumed with anger and fear after the event; however, many have chosen to accept the circumstances and it will be best to unite and work together. Following Hillary Clinton’s defeat, one could say she went into hiding, as we did not see much of her for the rest of the year. In the Op-Ed entitled “Rumors of Hillary Clinton’s Comeback”, Frank Bruni hypothesizes what would happen if Clinton were to run to be the mayor of the city of New York. Throughout the passage, Bruni uses rhetorical strategies such as irony, logos, and metaphor to develop his argument.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
...of the electoral vote in critical swing states necessary for Obama’s reelection victory (Casserly, 2012). Candidates now address issues entirely centered on women’s needs and concerns, knowing any win is impossible without support of female voters. This validates the current power women hold in the political arena today, and the impact their voice has made to society since being granted the freedom to vote.
In the “Declaration of Conscience,” Margaret Chase Smith addresses the American public and the United States Senate during a time of political unrest. Communist accusations and a “national feeling of fear” has brought upon this speech. Even with an upcoming election, the Republican Party decides a freshman woman senator would speak to the public, an uncommon practice at the time . In this paper, I will argue that Margaret Chase Smith’s “Declaration of Conscience” proves her credibility as a woman politician. Smith uses a masculine tone, simple diction, and repetition to prove to Americans and the Senate that she is a strong political figure.
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
...requent use of these appeals and strategies evokes a true response of sympathy and urgency to get a start on the revolution to gain women’s rights and equality. Steinem’s goal of her commencement speech to the graduating class of Vassar is not to relay stereotypical “entering the world with high hopes and dreams” advice, but to advocate social and political changes in America’s young, new future. She promotes social reform and helps to redefine what the feminist movement stands for. If society does not learn to unlearn the “traditionalist” ways, it will not move foreword in its attempt to exonerate women, men, and minorities from their preconceived and stereotypical roles. This argument is not only about the growth of women’s rights and power, but about the idea of humanism and that we all need to be liberated in order to initiate advancement of changes in society.
Emma Watson makes another strong point by giving an example “In 1997, Hillary Clinton made a famous speech in Beijing about women’s rights […] what stood out for me the most was that less than thirty percent of the audience were male. How
A debate is a direct manifestation of the political and cultural ideologies that often have to be interpreted from literary works. In the case of the GOP, they are one of the two major political parties in the United States; they currently serve as the majority in the legislature at all levels, and, if polling numbers are any indication, they seem to also represent the beliefs of a significant percentage of the American public. This debate, in particular, contained a pattern of statements and positions that betrayed a reality Republicans want to deny: there is an implicit bias in the country against women. Several examples of this behavior can be presented, in the same way that textual evidence can be teased from a