Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Implications of technology on crime
How software piracy affects the economy
One effect of software piracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Implications of technology on crime
We are living in the era of computers and advanced technology, the types of technology that we have today are the types of technology that I could only dream about decades ago whether it is, GPS, smartphones or the internet. We cannot deny that today’s technology allows us to work more efficiently in many aspects of our lives unfortunately, the same goes to the criminals as well. In this paper, I will identify and explain the three theories that I believe would best explain the crimes of the high-tech offenders using my own ideas along with the researches from credible sources to support the ideas. The three theories that I will be discussing are, Strain Theory, Subcultural Theory and Rational Choice Theory.
First, what is a high-tech crime? High-tech crime is also known as cybercrime and according to (Schmalleger, 2011), cybercrime is defined as, “Crime committed with the use of computers or via the manipulation of digital forms of data.” (p. 582). While some people may think that the threats of cybercrime are only present to the people with access to computers and internet. In reality, people need to realize that our government and many private institutions also rely on the computers to keep track of almost everything from birth certificates to social security numbers therefore; cybercrimes are also threatening those without computers and internet access as well. High-tech crimes can be committed in many forms and often include but not limited to, identity theft, money laundering, banks fraud and the hackings of computer or network. High-tech offenders typically have a good knowledge of computers and their components.
The first theory I would like to discuss about is the Strain Theory. In (Schmalleger, 2011), explained Strain...
... middle of paper ...
...that the high-tech offenders are posing a different type of threat to our society. High-tech offenders are more difficult to be traced than traditional offenders due to the fact that the crimes are often committed in remote locations even outside the countries. The advanced technologies that we have today also create new opportunity to the criminals as well. Cyber or hi-tech crimes typically required the uses of computer. In other words, the computers are the weapons of choices for cybercrimes therefore, does it means that almost everyone in this country is equipped with the weapons?
Works Cited
Schmalleger, F., Criminology Today: And Integrative Introduction, Fifth Edition (2011)
Suro, R. (1999, September 1). Washingtonpost.com: The Hackers Who Won't Quit. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/global1.htm
In criminology there are numerous theories as to the causes of different types of crime. These theories are extremely important in the continuous debate of the ways in which crime should be managed and prevented. Many theories have surfaced over the years. These theories continue to be explored individually and in combination, as criminologists search for the best solutions in ultimately reducing types and levels of crime. These theories include rational choice theory, social learning theory, and biology amongst many others. In this case study strain theory will be used to describe the reasons behind the white collar crimes of Charles Ponzi.
For instance, rational actors whereby offenders weigh the potential risks and benefits of committing an offense and the make a conscious decision on whether to commit a crime. In digital crime, the criminals chose to commit a computer crime. Also, offenders must be aware of the penalty for a particular crimes. In digital crime, offenders are argued not to know the potential penalties they face for particular crimes. In addition, the offenders must view the risks as unpleasant, thus, if a computer criminal do not think confinement and incarceration is hostile, then the criminal will not deter.
The documentary Rise of the Hackers, focuses on the rising criminal use of hacking and how it is effecting multiple areas of technology. The documentary describes simple and complicated situations concerning hacking, but there still questions that must be answered when it comes to hacking and crime. The main question is in trying to determine why a person would choose to commit computer hacking. There are various theories already present within the criminal justice system that may explain at a micro-level and macro-level. These theories would explain why offenders would commit the crimes, but it may not answer the full scope of the question. The Routine Activities Theory would help to explain why offenders offend, why victims are victimized,
A highly debated topic concerns whether criminals commit crimes because of a social pressure or an individual urge. The strain theory supports crime as a social pressure because, as Frank Schmalleger suggests in Criminology Today 222, crime is an adaptive behavior that coincides with problems caused by frustration or unpleasant social surroundings. Also, culture conflict theory states the cause of delinquent behavior is because different social classes conflicting morals of what is appropriate or proper behavior, (Schmalleger 228). Other people believe blaming crime on the economy or where they grew up is making an excuse for criminals instead of making them take responsibility for their actions, as stated by CQ writer Peter Katel. These different views started with statistics taken on crime in the early 1800s. Andre Michel Guerry of France was one of the first examiners of “the moral health of nations” in the early 19th century, (Schmalleger 35). Another early crime statistician was Adolphe Quetelet of Belgium . Quetelet evaluated the crime rates between weather, sex, and age. His findings that climate contributes to high or low crime rate is a main factor in today’s fight against crime. It is doubtful this issue will ever be settled since there are too many pros and cons to each side. However, while specialists’ dispute this, crime is not stopping. There needs to be a way, or possibly several ways, to reduce criminal activity. It is doubtful criminal activity will ever be put to an end. The same is to be said about why people commit crime, but knowing if it is done socially or individually can help with the fight against it. In the end, individuals should take responsibility for their actions, but...
An integrated theory is a combination of 2 or 3 theories that offers many explanations on why crime is occurring, compared to a traditional criminal theory that just focus on one type of aspect (Lilly et al.2010). The purpose of integrated theories is to help explain many aspects into what causes criminal behavior and why one becomes delinquent. From this an argument arises can integrated theories be used to explain all criminal behavior. Integrated theories are successful in explaining certain aspects of crime on what causes one to become deviant; however one theory alone cannot explain why an individual engages in crime. This paper will examine three integrated theories and look in-depth how these theories can explain different aspects on why criminal behavior occurs and the weakness of each theory. The three integrated theories that will be discussed in this paper are Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory, Robert Agnew General Strain theory, and lastly Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond theory.
In classic strain theory it is said that, Classic strain theory focuses on that type of strain involving the inability to achieve success or gain a middle class status. General Strain theory focuses on a broad range of strains, including the inability to achieve a variety of goals, the loss of valued possessions, and negative treatment by others. General Strain Theory has been applied to a range of topics, including the explanation of gender, race/ethnicity, age, community, and societal differences in crime
In criminology there are six general theories. Which include the classical school, biological theories, psychological/psychiatric theories, social structure theories, social process theories, and social conflict theories? These all focus on the reasons of crime and the criminality in criminals. In this paper I will define and explain each theory in means of the criminal world.
New types of technology have made it easier to track down and catch criminals. Then also made it easier for prosecutors to gather and present more credible information. Some new technology that has made it easier to track down criminals or help provide more reliable and supportive evidence is things such as DNA testing, computer technology, fingerprinting, and GPS tracking devices. “The main strengths of technology in the criminal justice system lie in the provision of databases which allow better and more efficient records to be stored and retrieved” (Bean 370). Prosecutors now in sense have “…an infallible test of truth, a foolproof method, of determining the accuracy and reliability of evidence and hence of convictions” (Pallaras 72). These 4 technological advancement...
Criminology is the study of why individuals engage or commit crimes and the reasons as to why they behave in certain ways in different situations (Hagan, 2010). Through understanding the reasons or why an individual commits a crime, one can come up with ways to prevent and control crime or rehabilitate criminals. There exist a large number of criminology theories, some link crime to an individual or person; they believe a person weighs the cons and pros and makes a conscious decision on whether to commit or not commit a felony. Others see the society as having a duty to make sure that its members do not engage in criminal acts by providing a secure and safe living place. Some claim that some people have hidden or dormant characteristics that determine their reaction or behavior when confronted or put in particular negative conditions (Akers & Sellers, 2012). By understanding and studying these theories, together with applying them to people, psychologists and authorities can prevent criminals from committing or repeating crimes and aid in their rehabilitation. As many theories have emerged over time, they continue to be surveyed and explored, both individually and in combination in order for criminologists to develop solutions and eventually reduce the levels and types of crime. The most popular criminology theories emphasize on the individual, positivist and classical traits. This paper will explore the classical theory, which is among the earliest theories in criminology.
Strain theories of criminal behaviour have been amongst the most important and influential in the field of criminology. Taking a societal approach, strain theories have sought to explain deficiencies in social structure that lead individuals to commit crime (Williams and McShane 2010). Strain theories operate under the premise that there is a societal consensus of values, beliefs, and goals with legitimate methods for achieving success. When individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. This is the basic premise of strain theory. This paper will explore the evolution of strain theories by first examining their intellectual foundations which laid the foundation for Robert Merton’s theories of anomie and strain. Merton’s strain theory will be discussed in detail including the modes of adaptation that people use when faced with societal strain. Finally, the paper will conclude with the strengths and weaknesses of Merton’s strain theory and an examination of the criminological theories and social policies it has influenced.
Technology has opened new encounters and opportunities for the criminal justice system. There are so many new practices of criminal activity, such as computer crimes. There are different types of computer crimes that many people become victims of every day. Computer crime is any crime that involves a computer and a network. The computer may have been used in the commission of a crime, or it may be the target ("Computer Crime: Chapter 2: What Are the Crimes?", n.d.). Crimes such as data diddling, pump and dump, social engineering and spoofing are computer crimes. Even though these crimes are difficult by privacy issues, the new technology has made investigations and prosecutions well organized and effective. Though views are different on the pros and cons of specific technological changes in the criminal justice system, there is an agreement the system has changed affectedly ("Effects of Technology in Criminal Justice | eHow", n.d.).
As a result, “technologies involved in crime analysis and their effectiveness for crime reduction and control” (Condon & Sanders, 2017, pp.239). The article has it own weakness since it does not consider the improper use of technology by the offenders to commit crime. It mainly considers the use of technology by the police and their effectiveness. There is a lack of the understanding of how to let police search offender’s technology without warrants. As a result, making this topic need of further research because increase use of technology has altered the way police use their technology.
The advances in technology has opened the world to endless possibilities to help make everyday life easier, but with the advances technology provides, similarly crime has also advanced. Criminals have easier access to gain information from their victims than ever before, as a consequence, innocent people and businesses fall victim to cyber theft, cyber vandalism, and cyberterrorism. Criminals who rob people of their identity or create cyber-attacks, their actions can be explained by rational choice theory. Rational choice theory is defined by a person weighing the cost and benefits of committing a crime. The individual is knowledgeable when deciding if a crime is worth the risk.
Cybercrime is a global issue plaguing the world. The dictionary defines cybercrime as “crime conducted via the Internet or some other computer network”(Merriam-Webster). The definition remains very broad because the word “cyber” is defined as “relating to the culture of computers, information technology, and virtual reality.” Due to the growing number of people gaining access to the internet, rapid development of technology, and the globalization of the world, more of the world population is becoming susceptible to involvement in cybercrime – whether it be as a victim or a criminal. Cybercrime involves different levels of the world on both the victim and criminal side from an individual citizen, to small groups, businesses, and the government, to the countries of the world. There are different groups from law enforcement agencies to the U.S. Secret Service, that are attempting to combat the problem through cooperation and preemptive efforts. If these groups combined with the public to protect themselves and the country from criminals that commit cybercrime, the nation’s network and technology servers would be much safer for technology users. Clearly, cybercrime is a problem because it puts internet users at risk of being taken advantage of or harmed.
Just as traditional criminal activities, cybercrime can take many forms and occur virtually anytime and anywhere. Criminals committing cybercrime use very different methods, depending on their abilities and goals. This should not surprise anyone after all cybercrime is merely an activity "criminal" to the ingredient that adds a computer or an electronic network for its commission.