Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau's thoughts on nature
Thoreau's thoughts on nature
Thoreau's view on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau's thoughts on nature
Since the beginning of civilization, man has always sought after wealth. The theory of wealth vs. happiness stands the test of time. The idea that the amount of wealth a man possesses correlates with his happiness is a common theory throughout many different countries. Although money cannot directly bring happiness, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs successfully supports the fact that there is a strong correlation between the amount of wealth that a human possesses and their level of happiness.
The theory behind Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is that once a person satisfies their most basic, physiological needs, they will move higher up in the hierarchy, eventually reaching the last tier of self actualization. As David Myers states, “We need food, rest, shelter, social contact” (Source B). The way to acquire the most basic human needs is through currency. In the majority of countries throughout
…show more content…
the world, currency is used to purchase food and shelter. As researchers have found, being well off does have an influence on a person’s overall well-being. There is a need to possesses money to move higher up in the hierarchy of needs. Once a human passes the first tier, they are one step closer to happiness. Money is essential in passing the first tier in a first-world country, proving the correlation between wealth and happiness. After moving through the physiological tier of the hierarchy of needs, humans move through the security tier, then they move into the belonging and esteem tiers. In the United States, the level of wealth that a person possesses has an effect on their political influence. Francis Klamm and a team of 17 researchers spent a numerous amount of time studying the correlation between wealth and political influence. “…Very wealthy people have more influence than somewhat wealthy people, who have more influence than middle-income people. And poor people have hardly any influence at all” (Source E). Klamm’s research strongly supports the theory that wealth correlates with political influence. The possession of a substantial amount wealth can give a human a higher status on its social ladder. The way to success and political status is through wealth in America. With political success comes the sense of belonging that’s stated in the hierarchy. Then, with the higher social and political positions, comes entitlement. Those higher in the ranks of politics have benefits such as large houses, security, and a sense of confidence and achievement. The sense of confidence felt by those in higher social positions are from the tier of esteem. Money allows those in places of power to move higher up the hierarchy to get closer to happiness. Maslow’s third and fourth tiers of the hierarchy of needs successfully supports the claim that money can bring happiness by showing that it is easier for those in positions of power to experience the senses of belonging and esteem. Lastly, after the belonging and esteem tiers comes the final tier: self-actualization.
In Walden, Thoreau argues that “Most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only not indispensable, but positive hinderances to the elevation of mankind” (Source F). In this quote, Thoreau states that there is a large difference between needs and wants. The physiological needs such as food and shelter are the necessities in life. It’s only when mankind finds the balance between needs and wants that one may be able to examine their inner riches. That mankind would finally be able to express its creativity. The inner potential that is present in the self-actualization tier. Money propels humanity through every tier of the hierarchy of needs, straight into the final need for enlightenment. With the fulfillment of all of the tiers of the hierarchy, comes the true happiness that Maslow’s studies sought after. It is evident that there is a correlation between wealth and happiness due to the propel that mankind receives from wealth to move through the hierarchy of
needs. To conclude, money cannot directly buy happiness. However, money can give mankind what they need to move through, and reach the final tier of the hierarchy of needs. Money brings the physiological needs of food and shelter. Then, money can drive the sense of connection that comes with political influences and social status. Next, the esteem that is achieved through social status further thrusts humanity until they finally reach the final tier of self-actualization. In conclusion, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs successfully supports the fact that there is a strong correlation between the amount of wealth that a human possesses and their level of happiness.
In the modern world, people posses more than what they can actually keep tract of physically and mentally. Everyone wants to live the “good life” where they can have no limits to the things they want. Whether it is clothes, cars, jewelry, or houses, the need to buy things that are affordable and are in style preoccupies the minds of many people. The argument for necessity goes against this way of modern living, but agrees with Thoreau's view on it. The argument is that people should have enough of each just ...
A well-known expression is that money can’t buy happiness, yet people fantasize of winning the lottery, living in their dream house, and possessing enough tangible objects to feel satisfied with their lives. Most are under the preconceived notion that the absence of wealth and power translates to hardship and despair. This, however, is not the case, because a self-effacing lifestyle is not an indication of a lower quality of life, and often is better than one of great fortune. People yearn to have the financial independence and capabilities of those in higher ranking positions, and are willing to abandon their morals and own personal well-being if it means being successful. It seems that by reaching a level of wealth in which money is no longer
Even though hedonic satisfaction is necessary for living a happy life, focusing only on hedonic pleasure will have the opposite effect. If you focus on money and the things it can buy as the source for your well-being, you are excluding a series of factors that are necessary to achieve a true state of well-being. The following passage from the article “On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being” clearly details that:
At the base of the hierarchy are the physiological needs of human beings. This level consists of a human's need for food, water, oxygen, sleep, and sex. Homeless people are at this level of the hierarchy because their concern is in obtaining those things necessary for survival. Once an individual has met these needs, they begin to seek steady work, financial security, stability at home, and a predictable environment. This level consists of overachievers and workaholics. People such as this are so concerned with their income that they do not feel that the amount of time they work is sufficient enough. If an individual meets all of these needs, then that person has obtained their general need for safety. Once human beings have obtained safety, they strive to fulfill their social needs. At this level humans concern themselves with affiliation, belongingness and love, affection, close relationships, family ties, and group membership. This is a particularly crucial level because if these needs are not met, then humans feel an overwhelming sense of loneliness and alienation. All the needs for love having been met, an individual seeks social status, respect, recognition, achievement, and power. All of these needs combine to fulfill an individual's need for esteem, and failing to satisfy this need, an individual endures a sense of inferiority and a lack of importance. All human beings are placed at one of these four levels, striving to satisfy the needs at that level. If there comes a time in which an individual has obtained all of the needs on the hierarchy, that person becomes ready, willing, and able to strive for self-actualization. According to Maslow, self-actualization is a distinctly human need to fulfill one's potential. As Maslow himself states, "A musician must make music, and artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is ultimately to be at peace with himself.
The article “High Incomes Don’t Bring You Happiness” verbatimly states, “Beyond $75,000, money is important for life evaluation, but does nothing for happiness, enjoyment, sadness, or stress” (Kenney 4). Those who spend prodigal amounts of money disdain plebeians because they claim that money is the foundation to living a great life. However, money only helps one meet certain needs and does not contribute in instigating true happiness within oneself. Happiness comes naturally by one’s actions and accomplishments. Although, money helps buy the commodities which satisfy one’s life, it is not the direct source for obtaining glee within a
Wealth and fame are not necessities that are needed to be happy with life. Fame and wealth are very sought after, because many people think those things and happiness go hand and hand. People are often mislead by this theory, money can make a person happy but it can also ruin every relationship they have and it can kill any ounce of joy they have. Wealth can be an idol that blinds people to the truly important things in life. When people solely focus on money to make them happy, they become emotionally and physically exhausted.
In the modern world, people posses more than what they can actually keep tract of physically and mentally. Everyone wants to live the “good life” where they can have no limits to the things they want. Whether it is clothes, cars, jewelry, or houses, the need to buy things that are affordable and are in style preoccupies the minds of many people. The argument for necessity goes against this way of modern living, but agrees with Thoreau's view on it. The argument is that people should have enough of each just in order to survive and live a comfortable life. Thoreau goes much further with this by not only reducing the number of things to posses, but by also reducing the quality to lower the price. An article about Thoreau agrees and says, “ Change in material conditions requires more than quaint platitudes and the quiet diffusion of sentiment” (McBride 35). However, for today's society quality would be important, but quantity would be something worth changing.
The research article "If We Are So Rich, Why aren 't We Happy?" By Professor of psychology Mihaly Csikszentmihaly is written to provide information to people and psychologists, with various examples and techniques from his books. Mihaly is the founder of "Positive theory" (1990), and originator of the "flow" concept, so through his studies Mihaly shows us that people in the United States believes materialism and having and excess amount of money will bring more happiness. This however is not the truth his studies show the opposite in fact, and it is clear that his article is more about providing information to the average person, rather than simply stating the facts of his books for a professional study. This is proven to be true when he talks
It assumes that the worker is motivated by the money, in contradiction to Maslows hierarchy of needs which states that, there are eight innate needs , Transcendence, Self actualisation, Aesthetics, Know and, understand, Esteem, Affiliation, Safety, Biological.
Wealth and happiness are two things society sees as coinciding: to be happy, money is a necessity, and to make money, happiness is essential. This assumption about wealth is close to correct, however overlooking the impairment wealth brings to a person: ignorance. Ignorance is a trait found in all sorts of people, but occurs the most often in those with wealth. When one’s wealth is so grand paying a house full of people to like you is reasonable, ignorance is bound to flourish. Without needing to be a good friend or a good person to make people joyful, the wealthy often forget to introspect, and instead inspect their houses to make sure the guests in them are pleased. The guest’s pleasure does not come from knowing the
According to Freud’s conclusion based on decades of experimentation and theoretical work in the field of psychotherapy, humans cannot be happy because a satisfaction of needs creates only a momentary phase of happiness which expires after some time. Therefore, the focus of life should not be obtaining happiness, and people should focus on avoiding suffering instead (Bullock, n.d.). However, several paradigms about well-being exist, and individual cognitive patterns and paradigms define the emotional responses to social influences. From an objective viewpoint, well-being is a state of consciousness that arises from a combination of internal and external factors, and money is an unstable external influence in defining subjective well-being.
Suppose one was to record their pleasures down on paper using a graph. At first, one might be confused as to how to go about quantifying their happiness. After consideration of the quality of ones varying pleasures though, one is more able to deduce whether it is a higher or a lower pleasure and graph them. This enables one to distinguish which things promote the greatest pleasure, which translates itself to strive for happiness. For example, consider the attainment of food or sex in contrast to mental and spiritual growth. When one is only interested in satiating their appetite for food or sex, the pleasure acquired is minuscule when compared to the acquisition of mental and spiritual growth. Thus, attaining mental and spiritual growth will bring o...
..., a person who earns $25,000 is happier than a person who makes $125,000 and an employee who makes $500,000 is only slightly happier than someone who makes $55,000. Lastly, there are more important things in life that and make you happy, for example, friends. They don’t come with a price tag, and if they do, you definitely need new friends. Money won’t make you happy since good times can’t be bought. You don’t need a fancy vacation to have a good time; it’s just a matter of who you spend it with. Over the years, humans have blown the value of money way out of proportion. People make it seem like if you’re not filthy rich, then you won’t live a good life but it’s not true. You can lack money and yet still live a perfect, happy life.
Abraham Maslow arranged human needs into a hierarchy of five needs, starting with the most important needs which are physiological needs such as, hunger, thirst, and warmth. He then went all the way up to the least important which is self-actualization that is known as the fulfillment of unique potentials. His hierarchy of needs is depicted in a pyramidal form with the most important needs at the bottom as a base and the least important towards the top. According to Maslow, self-actualization is becoming what we believe we are capable of being he also believed that self -actualization is as important as physiological needs. Many people desire to reach self-actualization because
Now how does a person go about being happy, well let us examine one of the most common questions in reference to happiness, “can money buy happiness?” most people would say “yes.” The answer to this question will almost always be yes, because society and humans in general tend to be greedy creature always wanting more, from a better house to finer foods there is and always will be more to obtain. But is having these things what makes humans happy or is it the success of achieving your own...