Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hickey 1991 trauma control model
Impacts of childhood trauma paper
Review of literature on childhood trauma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hickey (1997), in his trauma control model of the serial killer, argues that various factors can contribute to criminality and in particular to serial homicide. These factors can be biological, developmental, demographic or familial, including childhood trauma (Hickey, 1997, as cited in Miller, 2014, p17). Hickey’s model includes 8 elements – Predispositional factors, Traumatic events, Low self-esteem and fantasies, Increasingly violent fantasies, Trauma reinforces, Facilitators, Dissociation and Homicidal behaviour (Hickey, 2016, p149). Hickey believes that it is unlikely that any one of these factors alone is responsible for homicidal tendencies but suggests that it can be a combination of factors. He argues that a person is no more likely …show more content…
to be born a killer than they are to acquire murderous tendencies through watching violent television programmes (Hickey, 2016, p148). Hickey suggests that while there may be a number of predispositional factors that influence serial killers, it may require an event or number of events/traumas, acting over time, to cause a person to commit murder. He says that while some male violent offenders have been identified as having an extra Y-chromosome, which may have contributed to their violent behaviour, there are some men who possess this extra chromosome and never become violent (Hickey, 2016, p148). Hickey refers to the events that influence the serial killer as ‘traumatisations’, and these traumatisations include various negative events that typically occur in the early formative years. They include unstable home life, physical and sexual abuse etc. (Hickey, 2016, p148). Eth and Pynoos (1985), identified a number of effects of childhood traumatisation. These include images of violent mutualisation and revenge fantasies (Eth & Pynoos, 1985, as cited in Hickey, 2016, p149). In a study by Lang and DeWitt (1990), of 165 motiveless murders, committed since the year 1600 to the present, it was found that many of the serial killers studied had suffered from some type of head injury or organic brain pathology and suggested that these conditions can, at times, give rise to abnormal brain activity which may lead to compulsive autonomic behaviour (Lang & DeWitt, 1990, as cited in Hickey, 2016, pp148-149). The serial killer John Wayne Gacy sustained a head injury from a swing at 11 years of age, which caused a blood clot that wasn’t discovered until the age of 16, when he experienced blackouts (Sanmartin, 2001, as cited in Reid, 2017). The killer, Henry Lee Lucas, had suffered multiple head injuries as a result of parental abuse when he was a child (Norris, 1991, as cited in Reid, 2017). Hickey suggests that it is not the brain trauma in itself that causes the sufferer to become violent as not everybody with these traumas becomes violent.
He proposes that it is the trauma in conjunction with outside factors such as social or environmental, which exacerbate the problem and leads to the criminal activity (Hickey, 2016, p149). Hickey says that the most common trauma experienced by serial killers is childhood traumatisation caused by rejection and that this rejection can be in the form of rejection by family members or an unstable/abusive home life (Hickey, 2016, p148). Hickey says that rejection by family members, e.g. relatives or parents, is the most common cause of childhood traumatisation and that an unstable, abusive home has been proposed as a major form of rejection (Hickey, 2016, p149). Holmes, Tewksbury and Holmes (1999), in their ‘fractured identity syndrome’ theory of serial murder, suggest that serial killers are similar to everyone else in the early years of personality development and lead normal lives. They argue that an event or series of events that often take place in the serial murderer’s adolescent years, causes a fracturing of the personality and that this fracturing, following subsequent incidents, causes the fracture to explode into a
damaged personality (Holmes, Tewksbury & Holmes, 1999). While most people can cope constructively with rejection, some individuals can only cope in a destructive manner. Children who eventually become serial killers, Hickey says, have experienced childhood trauma that they were unable to overcome by therapeutic interventions (Hickey, 2016, p150). These childhood traumas result in feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem and can result in a process of dissociation (Hickey, 2016, p150). He says that, “In an effort to regain the psychological equilibrium taken from them by people in authority, serial offenders appear to construct masks, facades, or a veneer of self-confidence and self-control” (Hickey, 2016, p150). Hickey notes that the serial killer may supress traumatic events, to the extent that they cannot remember these events. He refers to this phenomenon as ‘splitting off’ or blocking out the trauma, resulting in dissociation (Hickey, 2016, p151). When this happens, serial offenders appear to create an image of self-assuredness and self-control and over time develop an unconscious false image that he/she is in control. A conflict arises between pretence and reality, which he/she is incapable of resolving. Traumatic events are supressed, resulting in an inability to recall the experience (Hickey, 2016, pp150, 151). Tanay (1976) suggests that the murderer is committing his crime in a state of altered consciousness. He is faced with a psychological conflict that cannot be resolved, and this results in part of his personality losing touch with reality (Tanay, 1976, as cited in Hickey, 2016, p151). Danto (1982), on the other hand, viewed dissociation as a type of anxiety, triggered when the mind becomes over-whelmed with anxiousness (Danto, 1982, p6, as cited in Hickey, 2016, p151). When this happens, the serial killer, in order to prevent a mentally painful experience, may supress the hurt and other painful feelings associated with the trauma, while not consciously supressing the fact that the trauma happened (Danto, 1982, as cited in Hickey, 2016, p151). In a study by Ensink et al. (2017), that examined the link between childhood sexual abuse and subsequent internalising, externalising and sexualised behaviour problems in children, it was found that dissociation was a frequent feature linking psychosexual difficulties in children to earlier child sexual abuse (Ensink et al., 2017). Hickey’s Trauma-Control Model, suggests that serial murder would have its origins in childhood, and as such, perpetrators would have a long history of criminal activity (Arndt, Hietpas & Kim, 2004). Studies suggest that most sexually motivated murderers were in their 20s, with a mean age of 28 years (Hickey, 1991, as cited in Arndt, Hietpas & Kim, 2004) and most operated in the age range of 16-48 years (Hickey, 1991, as cited in Arndt, Hietpas & Kim, 2004). In a study by Weatherby, Buller and McGinnis (2009), that tried to identify possible predictors of a serial killer, they used four known serial killers (Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Gary Ridgway and John Wayne Gacy Jr.). In keeping with Hickey’s Trauma Control Model, the authors found sexual fantasy during childhood to be common to all four killers. However, only 2 of the subjects acknowledged abuse during childhood (psychological abuse in the case of Gary Ridgway and physical, sexual, psychological and witnessed abuse in the case of John Gacy) (Weatherby, Buller and McGinnis (2009). Although the sample population in the study was small (4 subjects), this finding, nevertheless, conflicts with Hickey’s 2016 Trauma Control Model that suggests that abuse is a destabilising event that occurs during the early years of the serial killer’s life (Hickey, 2016, p148). Hickey’s (1997) Trauma Control Model suggests that for serious sexual compulsion to become actual acts of homicide, they must be activated by sociocultural facilitators, for example, sexually violent video games or internet pornography, which glorify violence and objectify women (Hickey, 1997, as cited in Miller, 2014, p17). Use of these facilitators precipitates the urge to kill and the serial killer starts to act out his fantasies – these can be the precursors to an actual killing. These fantasies become stronger and more addictive and eventually lose their ability to satisfy (Arndt, Hietpas, & Kim, 2004, p120). The sadistic serial child killer, Westley Allan Dodd, began exposing himself to other young children at the age of thirteen. This behaviour developed into child molestation and Dodd eventually ended up molesting and murdering three victims (King, 1993, as cited in Hickey, 2016, p200). At one point, Dodd reported that exposing himself “wasn’t fun anymore. I needed more physical contact. I started tricking kids into touching me. Then that wasn’t fun anymore, so I started molesting kids” (Fox & Levin, 2000, p36, as cited in Arndt, Hietpas, & Kim, 2004, p120). In the final phase of Hickey’s Trauma-Control Model, when fantasy has become reality, murder becomes an addiction. However, because each murder does not completely eliminate negative feelings held by the killer, a never-ending cycle of murder begins and this is accompanied by increased frequency and viciousness of the murders (Arndt, Hietpas, & Kim, 2004, p120). While Hickey’s trauma-control model incorporates a cyclical nature to serial murder, Del Fabbro (2006) suggests that there is an over-analysis on the offender’s childhood and insufficient explanation of the offender’s development in adulthood. While the offender’s development is ongoing, there is no discussion on how the killer’s fantasies and crimes change over time, or on the impact of environment and context at the time the offence is committed (Del Fabbro, 2006). With regard to childhood traumatisation, a study of 77 male serial killers found that more than 50% (49 children) had suffered the trauma of rejection and approximately 50% (38 children) had suffered the trauma of an unstable home (Hickey, 2016, p279). Coinciding with early childhood trauma, suggested by Hickey’s Trauma Control Model, it would be expected that serial murderers would have a long criminal history. In a review of 211 male serial killers, Hickey (2016) found that most offenders examined had some form of criminal history (Hickey, 2016, pp276, 279). While Hickey’s 2002 Trauma-Control Model follows the serial killer from childhood to the end of his killing career, its main application is to sexually motivated murders (Arndt, Hietpas & Kim, 2004).
The question of whether or not man is predetermined at birth to lead a life of crime is a question that has been debated for decades. Are serial killers born with the lust for murder, or are their desires developed through years of abuse and torment? Many believe it is impossible for an innocent child to be born with the capability to commit a horrible act such as murder. But at the same time, how could we have corrupted society so much as to turn an innocent child into a homicidal maniac? Forensic psychologists have picked apart the minds of serial killers to find an answer as to what forces them to commit such perverse acts. Their ultimate goal is to learn how to catch a serial killer before he commits his first crime.
The present paper intent to enquire into a female serial killer. It shall describe and analyze the theories behind the occurrences and sequent offer explanations. The studies of criminology theories it is important to recognize why humans decide on living a life cycle of crime. Wikipedia.org defines serial killer as, “a person who murders three or more people, usually in service of abnormal psychological gratification, with the murders taking place over more than a month and including a significant break (a “cooling off period”) between them.” Precisely of this, humans who tend to be a serial killer are prone to developmental and physical characteristics. Several of these trends could fit into a model standard of a crime. A good example of analyzing the life and crimes of Aileen Wuornos, an American female serial killer who killed
The case of whether serial killers are born with the lust to kill or if they are truly victims of their environment has been a hot debated question by both psychologists and the FBI today. A serial killer is traditionally defined as one that kills 3 or more people at different times with “cooling off” periods in between kills. Both psychological abuse as a child and psychological disorders are to blame for the making of a killer. The nature vs. nurture debate is best applied to the mysterious behaviors and cases of serial killers and their upbringing and environment. Nature is the genetic and biological connections a person has, personality traits, and how genetic make-up all relates to a killer. Nurture is examining the upbringing and environment that a person is around that affects what a person becomes. In some cases however, the effects of only upbringing or only biological problems were the reasons certain serial killers committed crimes. Although there is no definitive answer to what plays the bigger role: nature or nurture, they both are contributing factors that make a serial killer. These deviants of society are afflicted with problems in either their upbringing or have psychological disorders, and are able to blend into our everyday lives with no apparent differences, yet they wreck havoc through their unremorseful killings.
In a Google search of “serial killer memorabilia”, approximately 135,000 results would appear. While the U.S. produces over eighty-five percent of the world’s serial killers (“Why do Americans Idolize Serial Killers?” 11), Americans still tend to treat these murderers as icons and celebrities. As defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a serial killer is expressed as the unlawful killing of two or more victims by the same offender(s), in separate events. While it is no secret that serial killers have a different mindset than that of a normal person, do these murderers have genetically different minds? Although there is no exact answer as to what causes certain people to have the urge to kill, studies from the “Minnesota Study of Twins
Almost every major social, biological, psychological, behavioural influence that has been seriously suggested as playing a role in causing crime has been thoroughly thought of as potentially contributing to the behavior of serial killers (Levin, 2008). The time period and amount of killings fluctuate depending on the individual committing the crime. Usually, the murders happen in different geographical areas. A mass murder has a separate definition than a serial killer, because a serial killer has a “cooling off” period, where mass murders kill several individuals in a single event. Each of a serial killer’s killings temporarily gratifies whatever provokes the killer’s actions, and each subsequent killing terminates a separate sequence of behaviors.
Krafft-Ebing (1886) found that the serial killer had been through cruelty of animal; enjoy the torture and the pain of their victim during his or her childhood period. Moreover, the mothers of these serial killers were most of time working or doing other things and usually the father were absent. These children experience rejection and lack of attention, therefore, this child grows up having low self-esteem. Research show that adults that gone through abuse and violent behavior during their childhood were three times more likely to become violent as adult more than the non abused adults (Dutton & Hart, 1992).
There have been many theories over the years about how a person becomes a serial killer, and how does having an unstable childhood effect a person. It has been proven by psychologist and stated by serial killers that their childhood is one of the many problems they faced that led them to become a serial killer. The childhood of a typical young boy would consist of loving parents, a stable home and having friends. As for serial killers this is not typical at all. During the childhood of a serial killer it is not uncommon that he or she was abused, raped, or even attempted suicide along with many other harmful acts that a child should not be faced with. There have been many studies on the childhood of serial killers, and how they grew up compared to other young children. Some of the traits most male serial killers have as a child would include killing animals, auto-erotic activities, physical head injuries, and even bed wetting.
Serial killers are defined to “be driven by instinct and desire to kill.” In a study done in 2000, Dr, Richard Davidson says, “people with a large amount of aggression – in particular people who have committed aggressive murders or have a social disorder – have almost no brain activity in the orbital frontal cortex or the anterior cingulated cortex while activity in the amyglade continued perfectly. The orbital frontal cortex and the anterior congulated cortex control emotional impulses while the amyglade controls reactions to fear.” Davidson concludes his research claiming that although environment can and will affect a serial killer’s thoughts, it is a killer’s genetic makeup that inevitably creates murderous thoughts.
Serial killers have captivated the attention of scientists from the first signs of their existence to modern day. Interested by these killers’ inhumane actions, researchers set out to determine the cause of such graphic, horrific crimes. The brain has been brought into question regarding the motivation of these cold blooded killers. After extensive research, abnormalities of both the chemical composition and material makeup have been identified within the brains of numerous serial killers. These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.
Countless serial killers have had an abnormal childhood; many people believe this is where the catalyst of events starts. It is proven, that more often than not, serial killers have either lived in an inhabitable home, had lackadaisical parents, or could have a different frame of mind. This being said, when one hears about mass murderers or serial killers, the first question that pops into a person’s head is, “What were they thinking?” For all a person knows, this could be the killer’s normalcy.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
The question of whether or not man is predetermined at birth to lead a life of crime is a question that has been debated for decades. Serial killers are made not born; it has been demonstrated that a man 's initial years are the most vital years. A youngster 's initial couple of years is a period of experimentation, a period to make sense of things for themselves, a period to set up the bits of the riddle. Like a newborn child, the mental health is reliant on its environment. A youthful youngster 's mind resembles a wipe; it gathers data through perception. The surroundings of a serial killer as a little child can enormously impact the way he or she will go about his or her life and his or her style of murdering. Certain experience, for example, youngster misuse, divorce, liquor misuse, tyke disregard, as well as medication misuse, can be negative to the advancement of a little child. Numerous serial killers were illegitimate kids. Due to their childhood and early backgrounds, serial killers swing to crazy murdering frenzies.
The nurturing of individuals plays a role in the making of killers, as 94% of serial killers had experienced some form of abuse as children and 42% have suffered severe physical abuse (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2010). A child abuse is a determining factor, in which supports the idea that serial killers and psychopath, are influenced significantly by nurture (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011). In most cases social, cultural and physiological determinants all play a role in influencing serial killers to grow into a mass murderer. It is important that physiological and social determinants can be identified, so they could be altered for the purpose of preventing the number of crime.
So what makes a serial killer? Levin points out that contrary to popular belief, serial killers don't just 'snap'; or 'go crazy'; (Douglas, p. 137). Many of the serial killers have been the victims of childhood abuse. Jack Levin stated 'Research shows many serial killers suffered abuse, incest or neglect as children and develop poor self images'; (Douglas, p. 137). Serial killers often have a childhood marked by the absence of any nurturing relationship. 'They often come from families where the parents were absent or ineffective, where authority was not defined, and where they could engage in destructive behavior undeterred-violent play, cruelty to animals, and incidents of arson being some of the childhood behavior patterns noted among many serial killers'; (Clark, p. 206).
“According to Eric Hickey (Author of Serial Murderers and Their Victims), stress caused by childhood 'traumatizations' may be a trigger to criminal behavior in adulthood. It is important to understand that most people go through one or more of these traumatizations with no lifelong effects. However, in the future serial killer, the inability to cope with the stress involved with these trauma...