Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of Greek philosophy on western civilization
Influence of Greek philosophy on western civilization
Influence of Greek philosophy on western civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As I read the “Reports of the Origins of Athens” there were two passages that stood out to me, Herodotus and Aristotle. In Herodotus, it contained some unique information that caught my attention, for example the Doric and the Ionic Blood. The other passage was Aristotle, which gave me some thought that took place in the past before I was born. Both of these article required some research, because there were some things I didn’t know about. Each section had a name to start off with. The section that was most interesting to me was Herodotus. Herodotus was a writer that invented the field of study called history. He was called “The Father of History” by the Roman writer and orator Cicero for his famous work The Histories. He was also called “The Father of Lies” by critics who claim histories are little more than tall tales. Critics of Herodotus noticed that his work seems to have originated from the Athenians. The pervious information was acquired from http://www.ancient.eu/herodotus/ . …show more content…
Aristotle was a Greek Philosopher and a student of Plato and also a teacher to Alexander the Great. Aristotle had a major impact towards the groundwork for western philosophy. He was also a scientist, but not our ideal scientist today. He believed that knowledge could be obtained through interacting with physical objects. He also concluded that objects were made up of a potential that circumstances then manipulated to determine the object’s outcome. Mostly all of this information was acquired from
In Histories, Herodotus’ uses a variety of themes to narrate historical events and a common theme revolves around hubris. Extremely common amongst Greek literature and Greek mythology, hubris appears to be the infamous human trait. Greek mythology sees hubris as a great atrocity and results in an unrelenting punishment. The idea of hubris is that an individual with an authoritative position, a strong or influential leader, becomes extremely proud of his exceptional qualities and forms a delusion of his position to be on par with even the Gods. This blinds the hubristic individual into believing he can defy the Gods and elude ones inevitable fate. Herodotus’ Histories is no exception to containing individuals that display hubristic qualities similar to many other significant historical entities. In Histories, the theme of hubris assists the reader in making a connection between the excerpts from the end of book 1 (1-204-206) to other books and excerpts in Herodotus’ Histories.
This paper will offer a commentary on Herodotus’ Histories 2.129-135. Book Two of Histories concerns itself with Egypt; specifically chapters 99-182 detail rulers of Egypt both legendary and actual. Book Two is distinct from the other books in Histories as it is in this book that we predominantly experience Herodotus as an investigator. More precisely it is in Book Two that Herodotus treats first person experience not as direct evidence but as a method of assessing the accounts of others. Chapters 129-135 provide us with the tale of King Mycerinus as recounted by whom Herodotus refers to in 2.127 as simply ‘ÆGYPTIOI’. These Egyptians are referred to at various points in Book Two and at times appear to refer to what might be termed ‘Egyptians in general’ . However, we can make a reasonable assumption in this instance, given what has been stated before at 2.99 and what is stated later at 2.142, that the Egyptians that provide Herodotus with the tale of King Mycerinus are probably priests. It should not be assumed that priests are any more reliable than the lay Egyptian in Histories however; the Egyptian priesthood did not necessarily concern itself with historical accuracy. Indeed the inclusion of priests may simply be a Herodotean literary device designed to reinforce his reader’s credulity.
Dillon, Matthew, and Lynda Garland. Ancient Greece: Social and Historical Documents from Archaic Times to the Death of Socrates. London: Routledge, 1994. No. 7.42, p. 209.
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher, educator, and scientist. He was able to combine the thoughts of Socrates and Plato to create his own ideas and definition of rhetoric. He wrote influential works such as Rhetoric and Organon, which presented these new ideas and theories on rhetoric. Much of what is Western thought today evolved from Aristotle's theories and experiments on rhetoric.
Herodotus, Thucydides, Rawlinson, G. & Crawley, R 1955, The history of Herodotus, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago.
4) Ellis, Edward S., and Charles F. Horne. ?History of Athens Greece.? The Story of the Greatest Nations and the World?s Greatest Events, Vol. 1. 12 Dec. 2003
Martin, Thomas R., "Introduction to the Historical Overview in Perseus." An Overview of Classical Greek History from Homer to Alexander. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc+1999.04.0009. 17 Jan 2001: 1. Online. Netscape. 1 March 2001.
Epictetus, a revolutionary stoic of his time often makes some strong claims about the idea of stoicism. Stoicism is fundamentally promoting a lifestyle that yields a depleted happiness where everything is bounded by just desires being fulfilled and not enjoying the love and opportunities life brings to live it to the fullest and make life meaningful. Meaningful life is living with passion, happiness, love, and enjoying every moment you have because one only has one life. Being passionless is popular with stoics. The world is in large part affiliated with happiness regarding materialistic success, family love, meaning, why bring it down with selfish thought? I shall argue that I interpret the claims and lifestyle promoted by the stoic is
Aristotle is one of the most important figures in world history. The Ancient Greece has given us a lot of great people, but among them Aristotle, in my opinion, is the most influential and significant for development of philosophy and politics.
While comparing the two pieces of literature, The Histories, by Herodotus, and The Peloponnesian War, by Thucydides they had many resemblances but what really caught my eye was the strong differences between them. The two historians, who were seen as the original fathers of Greek Historiography, played a huge role in narrating history. Although there were some similarities, Herodotus’ and Thucydides’ works differ significantly in the amount of detail, writing style, and topics discussed.
Aristotle is considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in many subjects; one of these subjects being political theory. He has influenced the way we run our government and how politicians think. His works and opinions still continue to greatly influence our current government in a large amount of ways. His contributions to our government are very prominent, but he is often not credited. Even though his ideas did not create an instant effect, his beliefs slowly established a spot in today's society.
Aristotle is easily considered one of the most influential philosophers of all time, even currently in today’s society. The research and findings of Aristotle are credited with helping shape the foundations of philosophy today. Studies from Aristotle are even still studied today to advance what we already know. Aristotle left behind many pieces of work that he contributed to on many different topics that he studied and made inferences about. Some scholars say that he left behind up to two hundred pieces of work for the world to study and use to advance the understanding of different topics around the world (Shields). Aristotle’s constant strive for information and data throughout his life is the reason for the large influence he has had on the modern world today. Aristotle’s influence has shaped the way society thinks and the values that are portrayed
Relevant even to this day, Greek culture has served as both an exemplar and a guide to distant nations and countless individuals, personifying ideals of honor and knowledge. Characterized by its sophisticated government, classical art, and unique entertainment, Greece built somewhat of a foundation for coming eras to be structured upon. The extensive list of such revolutionaries includes Aristotle, a popularized philosopher and scientist. Though, perhaps his fame originated from his inability to conform to these titles. Aristotle was an embodiment of curiosity, attacking every field of knowledge without boundaries or limitations. This deep inquiry was matched by a system of structured reasoning, the combination of which ultimately leading Aristotle to his numerous discoveries and insights. Aristotle founded a school which served to educate the future generation of Athenians, shaped a society’s perception of scientific truths, and caused individuals to question preexisting notions of logic, existence, and ethical values within his studies of philosophy. Such thorough discernment and perceptions served to illustrate the
Aristotle made contributions to logic, physics, biology, medicine, and agriculture. He redesigned most, if not all, areas of knowledge he studied. Later in life he became the “Father of logic” and was the first to develop a formalized way of reasoning. Aristotle was a greek philosopher who founded formal logic, pioneered zoology, founded his own school, and classified the various branches of philosophy.
Aristotle is one of the most important western philosophers in history that has influenced our society in many aspects. Many of Aristotle’s teachings have affected our world for many years and still continue to have such a big impact. Some of the subjects Aristotle has influenced include: logic, physics, government and poetry. Aristotle’s study of poetry mainly focused on the elements to a good tragedy. Some of his elements have been used in Greek tragedies and modern movies. The Greek play, Medea, and the modern movie, No Country for Old Men, use elements from Aristotle philosophy, while using similar and different techniques but both achieving an effective tragedy.