Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of the therapeutic alliance
Conclusion of the therapeutic alliance
Conclusion of the therapeutic alliance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of the therapeutic alliance
Mr. Herbert Lindsay, was seen at his home in Boynton Beach, Florida for individual therapy. During this session, client and therapist took a moment to discuss any present issues and effective ways of resolving problems. The client reported that he met with his attorney earlier in the week regarding his trial. Mr. Lindsay stated that he believed that his plea deal was no longer available to him. He noted that his court date is set for some time in May. Mr. Lindsay presented for therapy with a euthymic mood. His broad affect was congruent with his behavior. The client described himself and his week as being "okay". Client appeared disturbed when it was made mention of his previous plea deal. He reported that he is “angry” and “frustrated” that
he is unable to see his family. The client was asked what could have been done differently to resolve his current circumstances. He noted that he could have just ignored his daughter’s inappropriate behavior or use another form of discipline. However, the client stated that now, the “law of the land” has made their decision in resolving the parenting issues in his home. He noted that if he was aware of the circumstances he would have addressed the problem differently. Mr. Lindsay developed an understanding that his decisions on resolving problems lead to his consequences, which he now regrets. The client was asked to identify what he thought his greatest challenge was. He noted that his inability to physically have his family at home with him is a challenge. He stated that going to prison will make his situation worse at home, but hopes that he can obtain probation instead of prison time.
Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits anyone knowingly or willfully offering, paying or soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly; in cash or kind; in exchange for; patient referrals or furnishing or arranging a good or service for a Federal healthcare program including Medicare or Medicaid. Stark would also apply to Hanlester as well but Stark was not enacted until after the Hanlester case. Stark is strict liability, does not require the knowingly/willfully element, and is not prosecuted criminally.
This incident involved Victim Athena Marie Herbert being a victim of an attempt rape at Suspect Gayk Chuldzhyan’s residence.
A forty-six-year-old man named Lawrence M. Bradford had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Syracuse, New York. Bradford claimed that police officers Chad D. Frederick and Shane M. Ryan entered his residence without a warrant, although his roommate Shara Bixby, let the officers into the house. Mr. Bradford said that the officers forced Shara Bixby into letting them into the residence after she had told police that he was not home. The two officers were there to arrest Mr. Bradford for his part in the assault of another man. Bradford pleaded guilty in Jefferson County Court in August 2013 to second-degree assault. Mr. Bradford and another man was accused of stealing money and property from Jeffrey Jewett in Watertown, New York, while striking him on the head and body, causing a cut above the victim’s
A summary of the case details (provide the circumstances surrounding the case, who, what, when, how)
The applicant Mr. Arthur Hutchinson was born in 1941. In October 1983, he broke into a house, murdered a man, his wife and their adult son. Then he repeatedly raped their 18-year old daughter, having first dragged her past her father’s body. After several weeks, he was arrested by the police and chargedwith the offences. During the trial he refused to accept the offence and pleaded for innocence. He denied accepting the killings and sex with the younger daughter.
Summary of the Case On August 1987, Donald Butler opened a store in Winnipeg, Manitoba, called the “Avenue Boutique”. In this store, Butler sold and rented pornographic publications that were considered “hard core” and sexual paraphernalia. A couple weeks later, the City of Winnipeg Police searched and seized Butler’s sexually explicit materials lawfully. From this, Butler was charged with 173 counts under s. 163 of the Criminal Code. These charges included s. 163(1)(a) which criminalizes the distribution and the possession for distribution of obscene materials, as wells s. 163(2)(a) for selling and exposing obscene material to the public.
The judge has decided he’s too mentally unstable to stand trial. As soon as he’s recovered from his injuries he’ll go into some sort of mental facility for children’” (Wolf 344). Many characters also change, in some ways
Fear and confusion plays a huge part in the criminal justice system because of the huge number of cases and facilities unable to handle them. The building is condemned and they have new judge had begun his position as the new supervising judge. His name is Roosevelt Dorn. Beckstrand is excited to be working on Duncan's. His case is a well known infamous one and Beckstrand almost hated the kid. Offenders in this case are used to a substantial number of setbacks in the system and and finding her main witness is becoming trouble for Beckstrand. Ronald, along with the other young delinquents, doesn't seem to care about anything.
During the Of Mice and Men debate, it considered the following case: George Milton’s decision to shoot Lennie Small was morally justified. Before the trial started, I voted for the motion because I agreed that it was right to kill Lennie. I chose to side with the proposition team because of several reasons. First of all, I placed myself in George’s feet, the killer of Lennie, and thought about what I would’ve done in his situation. I concluded that I would’ve done the same exact thing as he did. George was the only person who truly cared for Lennie and has always stick by his side through thick and thin. He wanted what was best for Lennie and chose the best idea available at the time, which was unfortunately to shoot Lennie in the back of the head. If he didn’t allow Lennie a peaceful death,
The Leopold and Loeb case of 1924 is nationally recognized to be the first of its kind. It was a crime committed by two wealthy teenage boys, Richard Leopold and Nathan Loeb, who committed murder with what seemed like no motive at all. This case was a catalyst for social interpretation as journalists played a major part in the discovery of details of the crime. Often time mixing fact with fiction, this case was talked about well beyond the years after it was laid to rest. Throughout the years there has been lots of speculation as to why Leopold and Loeb did what they did and many topics have been discussed; all the way from modern childhood to homosexuality. This case delved into every aspect of the boy’s lives and revealed new truths over time. The Leopold and Loeb case was never about the crime committed but more as how the journalists portrayed the boys in social media. Over time the case was interpreted as a sensationalist journey through an untypical crime that changed into a pop culture phenomenon that affected how crime and law is interpreted.
Leo, R. A. (2009, September). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
At about 1:00 PM, they brought evaluation reports into the courtroom. Defendant got assessed by two different doctors and both came up with the same conclusion that he suffered from bipolar
Mr. Lafountain is here for followup after switching from Depakote to Topamax. His Depakote was discontinued due to intolerable side effects. He is currently taking Topamax 50 mg twice daily. He reports that he is also having intolerable side effects from this medication including moodiness, irritability, anxiety, and insomnia. He feels that the medication is intolerable. He has not had any seizure activity.
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28. (2000): 315-324. Web. The Web. The Web. 13 Apr 2011.
Gary B. Melton, John Petrila, Norman G. Poythress, Psychological Evaluations for the Court: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers, Guilford Publications, 3rd edition 2007