Hell's Corner Character Analysis

646 Words2 Pages

While David Baldacci talks about the consequences of actions in his exciting novel Hell’s Corner, he explains how people will never be able to undo their actions -- whether it happened years ago or just recently -- and that there will always be an effect to this action, whether it is a positive or a negative. Since James Brennan, the president of the United States, knows about what Oliver Stone did in the past, he gives him a task with great risk and reward; “If you fail … the Russians are as ruthless as they come” but if you succeed, “then you will never have to worry about your government knocking on your door again” (Baldacci 13). Stone must face the consequences of his action -- killing two powerful people, a friends of the president, …show more content…

Since Stone made a crucial mistake and lead to the death of an innocent man, he is interrogated by the FBI and shunned by his “superiors” as a consequence of his costly error. Since Stone thinks that Turkel -- a person turned by the FBI and tasked to track down Osama Bin Laden -- is rouge, he decides to chase him, but leads Turkel into a trap where he is killed; because of this error, there were great repercussions including the fact that “no one [was] left standing after the NIC chief found out about an unauthorised operation that cost him his sole asset in the biggest counterintelligence investigation of his brief career.” If he “could have issued a hit on Stone, Chapman and Ashburn and gotten away with it, he would have” (Baldacci 419). Because Stone chose to chase Turkel without getting permission from his superiors first and then caused Turkel to be killed, Stone and everyone that he was working with were disbanded and forced to stop investigating the case they were all working

Open Document