Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality and its effects
Character analysis essay for the road
123 essays on character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morality and its effects
As many people have said, “What comes around, goes around.” Karma has been a major idea for many ideas for many books worldwide. For instance, “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a Sherlock Holmes murder mystery and an example of karma. In the story, Dr. Roylett murdered Julia Stoner, his step-daughter, with a venomous snake and planned on killing Helen Stoner, his other step-daughter. At the end, Dr. Roylett was murdered by his own snake, while planning on killing Helen Stoner. In reality, karma happens and the villain meets his end, which he plans for another. Cr. Roylett’s history of violence affected his desire to kill. Dr. Roylett is an aristocratic country gentleman, who was ruined by mortgage and robberies. “In a fit of anger, he beat his native butler to death…” (110). …show more content…
Afterwords, Dr. Roylett was sent to jail for a few years and married Helen’s mother, Mrs. Stoner, in India. When Mrs. Stoner died in a railway accident after their return to England, Dr. Roylett physically abused Julia and Helen. Dr. Roylett became the terror of the village. In addition, he threw a local blacksmith over a parapet into a stream. In the past, Dr. Roylett had both uncontrollable strength and anger to murder. Dr.
Roylett’s plan to kill Helen was very well-thought out. He had a venomous snake, whose venom can not be discovered, hidden in a safe in Dr. Roylett’s room. Additionally, his room was right next to Julia’s room, the first victim, and a ventilator connected both rooms. In Julia’s room, the bed is clamped to the floor and beside the bed is a fake bell-rope, which hangs on the ventilator. In Dr. Roylett’s room, there is a chair, which was stood on to reach the ventilator, a saucer of milk for the snake, and a lash, that is tied to make a loop of whipcord. Dr. Roylett’s plan to murder Helen begins when Helen had to go to Julia’s room due to fake repairs in Helen’s room. He would use the lash on the snake in the safe, so he wouldn’t be bitten, and use the chair to put the snake into the vent. Then, the snake would slither into Julia’s room, use the fake bell-rope as a bridge to the bed, and poison Helen. Lastly, Dr. Roylett would put the saucer in the vent, blow on a whistle to make the snake come back, and use the lash to put the snake into the safe. The brilliant plan to kill Helen Stoner would have made many detectives uncertain of Helen’s
death. When Sherlock Holmes and John Watson, his assistant, gets involved with the case, Dr. Roylett’s plan backfires. Before Dr. Roylett got the chance to murder Helen, she went to Holmes, seeking help on Julia’s death. Holmes and Watson looked for clues around Dr. Roylett’s mansion and decided to sneak into the mansion at night and wait in Julia’s room, while Helen stayed in her own room. As Holmes and Watson waited, Holmes heard a snake’s hiss and used his cane to attack the source. “Some of the blows of my cane came home and roused its snakish temper, so that it flew upon the first person it saw” (Sherlock 133). The first person that the snake saw was Dr. Roylett. At that night, Dr. Roylett died by his own snake on his chair. Karma has many ways of working and Dr. Roylett’s death was one. In truth, assault is given to the assaulter and the murderer falls into his grave, which he makes for another. In the story, Dr. Roylett, the murderer with a dark past, got killed by his own snake, with the attempt to kill Helen, his step-daughter. What caused the snake to betray its master was Mr. Holmes. At the end, “I am no doubt indirectly responsible for Dr. Roylett’s death, and I cannot say that it is likely to weigh very heavily upon my conscience” (Sherlock 133).
Throughout life we find that the universe tends to unfold as it should. Whether that be due to the laws of physics, or the false ideology that humans have convinced them self of, it seems as though "karma" is a definitive factor in how your life is perceived as either a "good day" or a "bad day". One could argue that depending on the frequency of your thought process that will determine whether the probability of whether good or bad events occur to you. For example, a woman wakes up and realizes that she has to go to the market to pick up some milk. This woman has had a full rested sleep and a good breakfast, she is clearly in a ecstatic mood. If she gets to the market and it ends up that she has to wait in line for 15 minutes that's not going to be the end of the world, it would be just a trivial delay in her day, and afterwards she can continue to enjoy her day. Take the same woman and have her wake up in a very grumpy, sleep deprived mood, and have the same scenario happen to her, waiting in line at the store is going to be an extremely aggravating and it will more than likely change the course of her day from bad to worse. This is going to make it much more likely that the woman will get into a confrontation or road range or anything to that extent. This example in simpler terms shows that if you go out essentially looking for a fight odds are you're going to find one. The basics of this concept can also be applied to both Nick, and Jay.
“I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.
The story of “Killings” by Andre Dubus looked into the themes of crime, revenge and morality. The crime committed in the story depicted the father’s love for his son and the desire to avenge his son’s death. However, his own crime led to his own destruction as he was faced with questions of morality. The character found himself in a difficult position after taking his revenge. He failed to anticipate the guilt associated with the crime he committed. Feelings of anger and righteousness are illustrated by the character throughout the story.
The destiny or fate following as effect from cause, also known as karma, overall classifies as an abstract idea. No one really knows if it is substantial or not; therefore, creating a lot of skeptics when it comes this concept. In life, when a person puts themselves aside and does a good deed for another, karma comes back in many forms for them. For example, when one does something charitable, later they may discover a ten dollar bill on the ground; some may believe karma disguised itself as the money while others deny that and claim it as no more than simply a coincidence. Skeptics deny and doubt any opinions regarding whether one’s actions, good or bad, find a way back at them; however, in the short story Sweat by Zora Neale Hurston, it seems that what goes
A unique word choice introduces this essay, causing readers to be misguided. Staples begins by saying “My first victim was a woman…”(383). This choice of words obligated our minds to perceive this man as a criminal who was about to tell us his story. Staples allows himself to be portrayed as such a horrible person because that is exactly what people viewed him as. He uses self-blame as though he has accepted the fact of reality that he was viewed as a criminal and always will be. It seems as though he wanted to mislead us as readers so we would make the same mistake others did. A feeling of great guilt is created for judging this man that we barely knew. In such a simple way, Staples creates an ...
Karma’s a b…. Is a common saying in today's society. This idea of you gets what you deserve is a warning William Shakespeare pushed in his play, Macbeth. Macbeth is a play about a once great, loyal soldier named Macbeth who was giving everything a man could ever need because of his astounding accomplishments, who then turned into a mentally insane king who killed the previous king out of greed. Shakespeare warns the readers about the idea of karma by showing how when macbeth was a good man he got rewarded, how when Lady Macbeth uses her mind to get others to do her biding that very mind is lost in guilt and finally how when Macbeth betrays his king Duncan, Macbeth’s own men betray him back.
"Royal Murders: Hatred, Revenge and the Seizing of Power." Barnes & Noble. The History Press, 9 Jan. 2009. Web. 06 Mar. 2014.
Gary Watson shares the true story of the serial killer Robert Harris in his essay “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil”. This inclusive narrative shares of a man who was once a very sensible young boy who found himself on the south tier of Death Row in San Quentin Prison. Through this story, the reader learns first about Robert Harris’s crime and then about his upbringing. Both of which are stories that one could consider hard to read and even consider to be a true story. Those who knew Robert Harris claimed that he was a man that did not care about life. He did not care about himself nor anyone else. Each inmate and deputy, from the prision, who was questioned about
Karma is ancient belief whose history can be traced back to when Buddhism had just been established by the Buddha and it was still in its early stages.Early Buddhism taught that karma was non-linear,meaning that your past actions would not affect you in the present, and your present actions would not affect your future. The quote, “Karma isn’t fate.Nor is it a punishment imposed on us by some external agent.We create our own karma. Karma is the result of choices that we make every moment of every day.” means that the actions we commit every day will create karma, and whether the outcome of that karma is good or bad is determined by your actions. On the contrary, some Indian schools taught that karma was linear, meaning your past and present actions would affect you later in life. The doctrine of the belief states that one person’s karma cannot affect another person’s future.For example, the transfer of merit states that one person can transfer good karma to another, and this is found in both Buddhism and Hinduism. However, a wide spectrum of various aspects of Indian religions believe that karma can be shared. The outcome of your karma is determined by whether your actions were helpful and kind, or if your actions were cruel and decadent.The quote, “Ka...
Johannes portrays to Arthur that he should be in fear of him, offering the idea that he believed he held power over this individual, in this case, to take the innocent man’s life. The judge involved in the case d...
He breeds anger in Clarence and the populace, not of himself, but of Edward and the rightful heirs. "We are not safe, Clarence, we are not safe,"3 he exclaims as his brother is hauled away to the tower. He preys on the "hateful luxury And bestial appetite"4 of the citizenry, catapulting himself to the thrown over a heap of bodies: deaths that hang on his head. But, it is Richard's attitude that his end goal of the crown justifies the murderous means that so closely links ...
Karma is the ancient belief that every action has a negative or positive reaction, balancing the universe. Through Lady Macbeth, Shakespeare teaches the audience that all actions have consequences. She wanted the best for herself, but hurt others to achieve that. So, what could have been an astounding life turned into a living hell?
Dr. Roylett then devised a plan to kill her. His motive was to gain all the money that Mrs. Stoner left. The first step to his plan was to create a ventilator that goes through Julia’s and Dr. Roylett’s room. The next step was a fake bell rope created for the snake to crawl on. Then, Helen was moved to Julia’s room. The reason was Dr. Roylett gave to Helen was construction being done in the room. Dr. Roylett goes step by step to create a trap for Helen to fall in. At night, whistling sounds were made to lure the snake onto the bed. In the text, “I suddenly heard in the silence of night the low whistle which had been the herald of her own death”(116). Helen recalls the whistling sound was heard by her sister before her death. Some other clues were the final words Julia said which were the speckled band. In order to, cover that he may have been a suspect other animals and people were involved. Dr. Roylett allowed a band of gypsies to stay on his property and kept wild animals from India. To summarize, Dr. Roylett is guilty of planning to kill Helen and will be paid with
6. Hallett, Charles A. and Elaine S. The Revenger's Madness. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press. 1980.
In the book “The Loaded Dice”, two stories “Fingers” and “Mrs Bixby and the Colonels Coat” have demonstrated the act of revenge very well. The story “Fingers” was a tale of L...