Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of 'The Spy' by Bertolt Brecht
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of 'The Spy' by Bertolt Brecht
Resentment. Hate. Injustice. These feelings and actions are what inspired Bertolt Brecht to write the play The Spy. In this play, a husband and wife are arguing about whether or not to call back the neighbors because of the rain. Their son hears them arguing and they give him money to go out and buy something to keep himself busy. In the end their child comes home with chocolate. That is the cliff notes version of this story but it goes much deeper than that. Authority figures can create environments in which equals are given power over each other which in turn, instills a sense of fear and paranoia. That is what Brecht explains in his satirical play The Spy.
Bertolt expresses his criticism towards the Germans and Hitler in many different ways throughout the play. In the play the “Man” and his wife are angry at the Nazi’s. They are angry at Hitler for taking their world and flipping it upside down. “At least in the old days you could go and meet someone.” “In the old days... All this talk of the old days gets me down.” Hitler completely changed the lives of not only the Jews but the Germans as well. This is not something we would expect. We would expect the lives of the Germans to have improved significantly but now we know the truth. The
…show more content…
“Man” is not just some character in a play. He is the advocate for Bertolt’s anger and resentment. Bertolt is voiceless and “The man” is his voice. “They’ve something against everyone. Everyone’s suspect. Once the suspicion’s there, one’s suspect.” Anyone and everyone has been given power. Hitler has done this and in doing so he has created an environment where no one is safe and there is no trust. If you speak your mind then you are guilty. Guilty of having your own thoughts. Guilty of speaking up. Guilty of having a moral conscious and knowing that what is happening isn’t right. “The youth scares me stiff.” They now live in an environment where they can’t even trust their own kids. “What about that boy the Schmulkes were telling us about? They say his father’s still in a concentration camp. I wish we knew how long he was in the room.” One wrong thing said, one misunderstanding and you were off to the concentration camps to be treated like animals. One thought “out of line” and you were done for. What right did Hitler have to do this to them?
To all of them? To the countless families and children. What right did he have to take their world and break it to shambles? They had no right. They had no reason. But still they did. Bertolt is resentful. Resentful to be German. To be associated with the name “Nazi.” To be part of a culture that took the lives of millions upon millions and even screwed with the lives of those who lived under Hitler’s reign. “Neither in the old days nor now did I wish to have my son’s imagination perverted for him.” They’ve corrupted the children. Turned them against their parents by influencing them to join “Hitler youth groups.” The words youth group and Hitler in the same sentence are pure
irony. The “Man” asks his wife to pack him some things if worst comes to worst, which they thought would. They are ready to abandon everything after spending time paranoid on where their son might have gone and if he had told the authorities that his father would not stand for such filth in the paper and that their acts of treason between the four walls of their house were grounds for sentencing to concentration camps. His wife had borne him a Judas. A betrayer. A spy. But in the end their son had simply gone to buy chocolate. “Whatever else? Obvious, isn’t it?” Obviously he had gone out to get chocolate. Obviously he was loyal to his family. “Obviously” huh? Or so it seems.
I think he felt that if he got your forgiveness then he could die in peace for all the bad he had done. A lot of Jewish people had died due to what Hitler ordered everyone in Germany army to do. Albert Speer was a high-ranking Nazi member and he was also Hitler’s minister and even though he knew he was going to jail no matter what was said at the Nuremberg trials he had confessed to all the things he had done. According to Speer “My moral guilt is not subject to the statute of limitations, it cannot be erased in my lifetime” (245). In making this comment, Speer knew that even though he was punished with twenty years of imprisonment that they only punished his legal guilt. Speer was haunted by the things he had done and he knew that he did not deserve anyone’s forgiveness. Even Speer, Hitler’s minister, knew that no one in the German army deserved anyone’s sympathy or
“Yes. I see them plain before my eyes…I can see the child and his father and his mother(Wiesenthal,47).” This heinous act committed by the soldiers Karl served with seemed to haunt him on his death bed. The memory of the families and the cries of innocents burning in that home seems to be one of the main things Karl is asking for forgiveness for. The memories seem to haunt him and before he dies he wants to make peace with the ghost of his life, not wanting to bring them into the afterlife with him. The memories of that event have weighed heavily on Karl’s conscious, and it seems if there were such things as a double take in life he would go back and find a way to help those innocents. Karl has a lot of deaths on his conscious not from acts he committed; however, from acts seen by him or acts that he did not stop. By asking for forgiveness from Wiesenthal Karl wanted to die knowing someone knew he was truly sorry for his actions and was willing to pay for them in the afterlife. Even though Wiesenthal was not a Jew whose Karl’s actions affected, his apology was for the community as an SS
This is a lesson that is still relevant today. Though the acting and dialogue seem to appeal to an older audience, young viewers can still enjoy and learn from this play. Prejudice, suspicion, and thoughtlessness are as prevalent as ever. For any problem, humans will look for a scapegoat. The War on Terror seems to bring similar feelings as those around during the Cold War.
It reminds the audience that while no one could likely ever be as evil as Hitler, history has a way of repeating itself. We are urged to pick our leaders carefully, to take interest in politics and choose are affiliations well. Most importantly, Tony Kushner is trying to call us to action in this play. He urges each and every audience member to avoid the pit falls of complacency as Agnes succumbs to in the play. To take no stance at all is not to be untouched, as Agnes had seen many of her friends leave as a result, but to remain stagnant, to be haunted by your fears and regrets, and to die with no one to remember you. Tony Kushner’s warning serves equally well, whether you are from 1930’s Berlin or 1980’s New York, or even if you are from 2016 Elizabethtown
The violent actions of the Germans during this event force an image upon them that conveys the message that the Germans had little respect for the life of a person, specifically that of a follower of Judaism, and their capability to act viciously. If the Germans are acting so cruelly and begin to act this way as an instinct towards the Jews, they are losing the ability to sympathize with other people. This would be losing the one thing that distinguishes a human from any other species, and this quote is an example of the dehumanization of the victim, as well as the perpetrator. Later on in the night, all the Jewish prisoners discover their fate at the camps and what will happen to people at the crematorium. They respond by saying to the people around them that they “.can’t let them kill us like that, like cattle in the slaughterhouse” (Wiesel 31).
The original title of the movie was supposed to be The Man I Will Kill, Bruckner was supposed to be shot by Hans for revenge. However, Soviets didn’t want this to influence violence. Soviets wanted the end to show peace so it would further their ideology of moving on with the past and perusing justice the moral way. As the film progresses and we learn more about the characters we see each character as a stereotype for a variety of political stances. Ferdinand Bruckner is a war criminal, who has benefited from the war by making pots out of war helmets. He puts up a good front and comes off to people as kind and friendly. We know that this isn’t the case. We see that he can be portrayed as an archetype loyal Nazi. Susan Wallner is portrayed as a model citizen from the very beginning. Right after returning home from a concentration camp she is ready to rebuild her life and she is very optimistic for the future. We also know from the film that her father opposed fascism. Hans Mertens, who struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder, cannot seem to get over the past at first. Towards the end of the film we see that he has a revelation and he, like Susan, is ready for the future. Hans seems to
During the Holocaust, around six million Jews were murdered due to Hitler’s plan to rid Germany of “heterogeneous people” in Germany, as stated in the novel, Life and Death in the Third Reich by Peter Fritzsche. Shortly following a period of suffering, Hitler began leading Germany in 1930 to start the period of his rule, the Third Reich. Over time, his power and support from the country increased until he had full control over his people. Starting from saying “Heil Hitler!” the people of the German empire were cleverly forced into following Hitler through terror and threat. He had a group of leaders, the SS, who were Nazis that willingly took any task given, including the mass murder of millions of Jews due to his belief that they were enemies to Germany. German citizens were talked into participating or believing in the most extreme of things, like violent pogroms, deportations, attacks, and executions. Through the novel’s perspicacity of the Third Reich, readers can see how Hitler’s reign was a controversial time period summed up by courage, extremity, and most important of all, loyalty.
of the Holocaust and Hitler's attitude towards the Jews, he hits home for most of us. Despite
I stated before about how I would have forgave Karl for his wrongdoing to the Jewish people and others. The Holocaust was a tragic thing and we can all agree to that. When I think of the military, I think about learning respect for your commanding officers and other soldiers and civilians. Karl was commanded to shoot anyone who was trying to escape from the burning house so he listened to his orders when a family did jump. If I was there in Karl 's shoes, I for one would have shot the family when they jumped even though it would have been wrong and I wouldn 't want too. In the symposium responses, Lawrence L. Langer stated, "When we call the murder of a helpless Jewish father and a child a 'wrong, ' we ease the crime into the realm of familiar and forgivable transgressions and relieve ourselves of the burden of facing its utter horror" (188). No matter what word we use to describe the killing of millions of helpless Jews, it will still feel like what Langer
As Hitler rose to power, he created many organizations within the Nazi Party. The groups were for many different people, including teachers, doctors, civil servants, women, lawyers, and students. The organization for students was called Hitler Youth, which became a very important part of Nazi Germany from its creation in 1922 to its disbandment in 1945. In the Hitler Youth, the German children were taught that they were better than everyone else. They were also taught that since they had Aryan blood, they were the master race and were the only ones that should be able to live in Nazi Germany. Even though the Hitler Youth members were brainwashed, they should still be held accountable for their actions because they caused just as much harm as
The Nazi Party had numerous methods to influence the opinion of Germany. The Nazis saw the youth as the future of Germany as well as whom they must control the most. The Hitler Youth Organization was one of the most influential forces within the youth of Nazi Germany. In fact, by mid-1933, the Hitler Youth had successfully achieved its goal to either “Nazify” or disband all competing youth groups within the country (“Hitler Youth”). Within the group, German youth were taught the ideology of the Nazi Party. This included education of their views about the status and treatment of Jewish people. As stated in a source of material for the Youth Leaders, “People differ therefore in more than their physical characteristics… their inner relationships must therefore be studied. Then we will clearly recognize the vast difference between those of German blood and the Jews…We then understand human inequality.” (Bytwerk). Their avid belief in social Darwinism, r...
...ough. He also compares himself with his dead brother because he thinks his dad favors him since he lived through the same experiences. This survivor’s guilt is even seen in his father, since he takes out his guilt of surviving, when many of his friends and family did not, on his son. Guilt is one of the driving factors of this book, and shows how the greater society feels towards the Holocaust. Society feels guilty for not doing anything to stop the Nazis. Many people knew what was going on, yet they didn’t stop them. Even people in the Jewish community heard of what was happening, but didn’t believe them. Now after everything is said and done, the feel guilty for what happened. Just as Art feels guilty for not living through it, society as a whole feels guilty for not stepping in. No one truly survived the Holocaust since the guilt is constantly weighing on them.
Two simple words, I promise can change a life. However not all promises are restricted to the light side, some may feed on the darkness of evil. A promise means a declaration or assurance that one will do a particular thing or that a particular thing will happen.Victims of the Nazi genocide felt strongly about many topics including their religion, one Holocaust victim said, “I have more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He alone has kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people.” This quote has evidence about this time in history and how victims felt. As time went on everyone not just Jewish people, had lost hope along with faith in their God . Furthermore Hitler was the only one they could trust to keep his word, even if it was to continue eliminating Jews along with other religions they knew he was serious. There were many humans that contributed to his evil mission, however some contributed more than others. Furthermore Josef Mengele played a significant role in the number of deaths the Nazis caused. While living under a false identity, Josef Mengele was found as the most heartless intelligent monster of the Nazi Genocide.
Shakespeare’s plays, among other classic works of literature, tend to be forged with the tension of human emotion. The archetypical parallel of love and hatred polarizes characters and emphasizes the stark details of the plot. More specifically, the compelling force of revenge is behind most of the motives of Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet. The play opens with the return of Hamlet’s father, a surprising encounter, which ended in his son learning that his father’s death was the result of foul play. By emphasizing this scene as the beginning of the story to be told, Shakespeare clearly implies that the plot itself will be based around the theme of revenge. Through three different instances of behavior fueled entirely by vengeance, Shakespeare creates an image in the reader’s mind, which foreshadows the future of the story and provides insight into the plot line. Even so, despite the theme of revenge being the overarching concern of the plot, the parallels drawn between characters truly strengthen the thematic depth of the piece overall, making the play easily one of Shakespeare’s most infamous and historically valuable works.
This is what had made Hitler one of the greatest public speakers that the world had ever seen from his time and in history. "The German people and it 's soldiers work and fight today not for themselves and their own age, but also for many generations to come. A historical task of unique dimensions has been entrusted to us by the Creator that we are now obliged to carry out." Hitler, the Fuhrer of Germany, was a very talented spokesman in ways that leaders today could not even begin to compare with. He was charismatic and bold, making it easier for him to win over the minds of many Germans with these two traits. He believed that during his rise to power, he and the people of Germany had been given a duty by God to purify the nation of its imperfect races and weaker people so as to make the mother country strong again for future generations. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." In many ways, Hitler felt he was justified in what he was doing, and in some