Harvest Of Shame: Documentary Analysis

516 Words2 Pages

A documentary is a non - fiction film in where filmmakers are documenting an individual, a place or a thing in order to represent an aspect of the world. That’s what makes a documentary film unique because they are not producing a fictional world, but an insight of reality in which we tend to dismiss.
Documentary films use a mixture of techniques to entertain and convince the audience that the images that are shown in the documentary are true. In order to make documentaries, there are four different methods are applied: institutional, practitioners, text, and audience.
Institutional framework is when organizations and institutions impose what types of documentary should be created. At the same it gives them the cue if a given documentary can be considered as a documentary. “Harvest of Shame” falls in this category. CBS network sent Edward Murrow, a television reporter to investigate how life of a migrant worker was in the 1960’s. Foremost, they are sponsoring migrant workers by humanized them by giving chance to utilize their voice. Second, exhibit how the sales of agricultural produce affects farm workers and how they struggle to survive. Lastly, they distribute the main issue of poverty that is rising in America. …show more content…

This group of individuals goes to film festivals and talk with other filmmakers to contribute info, for example journals, articles and interviews. “13TH” by Ave DuVerna is a great example she interviewed a range of expert’s politicians, activists and citizens throughout the film. Like other professionals, they all speak a common language, and share distinct and common problems. In the case of DuVerna she argues how American criminal justice systems effecting minority ethnic groups and how do we create a change to our justice

Open Document