Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American involvement in the Korean war
A essay on the koreans war
Short essay of Korean war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American involvement in the Korean war
Presidents are leaders that strenuously work hard to protect their citizens and nation, despite the hurdles they face. Harry S. Truman informed the nation about the difficulties the US had to deal with regarding Korea. He expressed how he truly believed: to avoid the third world war, the attacks in Korea had to be stopped. Without a doubt, if the plan was successful, peace would have been obtained. Truman’s speech is effective at persuading the audience to realize how important it is to obtain peace and how his way was the best route to take. Throughout former President Truman’s speech, he constantly addressed to the audience as one. For example, he stated “Our Government and other countries associated with us…”(Truman 13) as a method of talking …show more content…
Truman increases his credibility not only as an American but especially as the president by striving for what was best for everyone. In the speech, he wanted to ensure the security of our forces and he did so by stating “...to make sure that the precious lives of our fighting men are not wasted...”(Truman 29). Even though his main goal was to achieve peace, he was not about to waste the lives of American forces that defended the country. By doing this, he exhibited his high appreciation to the soldiers that serve the nation. Truman took a risk and fired one of the greatest military commanders, General Douglas MacArthur. For instance, he declares how it was “...essential to relieve General MacArthur…”(Truman 30). President Truman explained the termination by saying despite how incredible someone is, they are not worth the destruction of world peace. Undoubtedly, individuals like General Douglas MacArthur are significant, but the welfare of the people was Truman’s priority and duty as president. The audience is moved by how the president set his priorities and took necessary actions to achieve goals despite the challenges and roadblocks along his …show more content…
It has been in America’s history to help others in need so truly it can be done over and over again. In particular, when Greece was aided by the UN when they were most vulnerable ,“The attack against Greece, could have led to general war. But this country came to the aid of Greece. The United Nations supported Greek resistance.”(Truman 11). The UN was helpful in many ways so people expected for it to be done successfully again. Additionally, the Berlin blockade proved to be an excellent example of how to prevent a problem before it could ever begin to spiral out of control. Such as, “Another big Communist threat to peace was the Berlin blockade. That too could have led to war. But again it was settled because free men would not back down in an emergency.”(Truman 12) Yet again, another instance of the UN defending a nation in need, correcting problems that need to be fixed before it was too late. The US. along with other nations, believed war could be terminated if the attacks in Korea were stopped as soon as possible. The free nations have learned that history tends to repeat itself if nothing
There are many opinions surrounding the question: Was the decision by Truman to drop the atomic bomb ultimately the right or wrong decision? Not only can this question be answered in many different ways, it can be interpreted in many different ways as well. Overall, Truman ultimately made the right decision to drop the atomic bomb. This can be supported by the fact that the atomic bomb helped prevent the deaths of American troops, saved the lives of foreign citizens, and in comparison the atomic bomb was not as destructive as the firebombing in Tokyo.
He first built up credibility to show that he was the right man for the reward, and then he went on the tell reasons of how following duty, honor, and country is logical. MacArthur then gets to the cadets emotional sides, and he makes sure the cadets remember the message of the speech. The message did get across as the motto of the United States Military Academy in West Point is still Duty, Honor, and
The Cold War began and Truman worked to contain communism. The Soviets had put a containment around Berlin and therefore the American’s could not get in supplies to the democratic people there. Truman then got the daring idea to do an airlift to get supplies to the people there and it was highly successful. This was a brave action because of a few reasons. The nation was scared of another world war with the Soviet Union and Truman had the lowest approval ratings he had ever had. This action had a chance of causing retaliation from the Soviet Union and was therefore highly risky. He also had reelection coming up which required the public’s approval and this action could risk getting that approval. While this showed bravery for the previously stated reasons it also showed his compassion for people. He made sure these people were taken care of with very few excuses. This event also led to an expansion in the defense department in the United States. This growth of the defense department continued for several years and continued to provide some protection throughout the Cold War. While it can be difficult to see exactly how this effected the rest of the Cold War but it can be argued that it definitely helped the side of democracy in the world. Both bravery and compassion are great traits for a successful President, so it is no surprise that he was so
The Korean War changed the face of American Cold War diplomacy forever. In the midst of all the political conflict and speculation worldwide, the nation had to choose between two proposed solutions, each one hoping to ensure that communism didn?t sweep across the globe and destroy American ideals of capitalism and democracy. General Douglas MacArthur takes the pro-active stance and says that, assuming it has the capability, the U.S. should attack communism everywhere. President Harry Truman, on the other hand, believed that containing the Soviet communists from Western Europe was the best and most important course of action, and that eliminating communism in Asia was not a priority.
Phillips, Cabell. The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession. New York: MacMillan, 1966.
Throughout the case study, “Relief of General MacArthur,” General MacArthur displays legitimate, coercive, referent, and informational power. General MacArthur worked his way up to becoming a general, therefore displaying legitimacy. He has referent power because he is considered a “military hero and politically powerful,” and he demonstrated coercive power in that he led in a defensive approach. The President would restrict him, yet he would ignore the restrictions and go forward with his plan. General MacArthur, towards the end of the case study, exemplified informational power when he continuously met with the press and used information to criticize President Truman. President Truman, on the other hand, displayed legitimate power, referent power, and coercive power. President Truman also worked his way to becoming the President. The American people had to cast a vote for him to be elected making this both legitimate and referent. He displayed coercive power when he reprimanded General MacArthur by restricting his authority.
Truman’s accomplishments in his domestic policy were impressive, considering the hardships the nation was experiencing as World War II came to an end, and the resistance of Congress (which was greatly made up of Republicans and conservatives) to liberalism. The president was able to pas...
Harry Truman applied utilitarian and Kantian principles in his ethical behavior. He was not one who wanted to have long meetings, he hated them, and most of his meetings did not last longer than 20 minutes. Truman always internally debated big decisions, facts, details and planning was very important to him, and when we felt that he was morally correct he was unshakable.
Despite not having any prior experience with foreign policy, Truman had managed to end the war in the first six months of his term. The first example of Truman’s contribution to the war was in 1941, while he was Senator of Missouri. Truman created the Senate Special Committee To Investigate The National Defense Program, or as it’s commonly referred to as, the Truman Committee. This saved the government $15 billion dollars, exposed corruption in the defense industry, shed light on shortages of rubber, aluminum, and other strategic war materials, called manufacturers to account for bad work, prodded labor leaders to discourage strikes, and streamlined federal contract practices. The panel staged 732 hearings on a wide range of subjects—steelmaking, shipping losses, housing construction, labor shortages, camp construction, etc. They also produced 51 committee reports, each one unanimously approved by Democrats and Republicans on the panel. Truman's skillful handling of the panel, which managed to be critical of the Roosevelt administration withou...
A multitude of influential presidents have come and gone in America, although none like Harry S. Truman. This above average president is one to be recognized for his unbelievable achievements within political foreign policies and governing here in the states. Although first struggling to gain his balance after the sudden death of his predecessor, Truman remained loyal to the Unites States and proved to be one of the most charismatic, and beneficial presidents that the nation has ever seen. The influences of Truman’s early life and introduction to politics, as well as the unexpected win of presidency and constant failures and triumphs shaped this man’s life as well as those of the American people.
Moreover, it served as a precedent for future U.S. policy of interventionism. According to Stephen Ambrose, an important quote from Truman’s speech, "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures," stands as "all encompassing" and would "define American policy for the next generation and beyond." "1 Faced with strong opposition, Truman was still able to achieve a consensus in Congress aimed at quelling the communist threat through active foreign policy and involvement. The Truman Doctrine not only demonstrates the new foreign policy of the U.S., but also helps explain American foreign policy since the Doctrine’s inception. At the end of World War II, the military and foreign policies of the White House were moving in opposite directions.
In many ways John F. Kennedy’s decision to have this speech as well as the contents itself, reflected how he was instrumental to success in keeping the public calm. The president could hav...
What Truman is portraying is the idea that if the government silences its people, then the people will forever live in fear of the government. Truman supported the freedom of speech because he believed that people should have the right to express themselves. A question comes to rise from this belief though- should a person be limited to what beliefs they can
As the Cold War era heated up, Presidents began to become more and more nervous in the hot seat, and this is where we see the trend of seemingly bungling, clandestine presidencies with leaders who didn’t know how to effectively spread themselves across the issues at home and overseas. Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy all had fairly similar policies aimed to promote racial integration, expand Social Security, contain the Soviet threat to the Eastern Bloc, and rebuild postwar Europe under an American democratic influence.1 Truman’s actions are more so admirable than anything when one considers the immense stress and disapproval he was under for the majority of his two terms; none the less, he still proved to be a very adept leader, and did not merely wish to carry out things correctly, but to do what was correct.2 Having to pick up from was immediately faced with the difficult decision of whether to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, and his ultimate, and highly controversial, decision to use the bomb led to the unconditional surrender of the Japanese and the official end of WWII for America.... ... middle of paper ... ...1 (2006): 59–74. Pach, Chester J., and Elmo Richardson.
During the Truman and Eisenhower administration a policy of containment served to save the free world from communism. But at times these two administrations put world peace on the line to prove its superiority as a nation. One cannot judge these events to being wrong or right because values of a nation and people change with time, we can just learn from these events and know that the next time United States has a contest of superiority it could cost us the world.