Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development in the Harry Potter series
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character development in the Harry Potter series
In Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, there are a few characters that cannot quite take care of themselves. These characters then must be protected by others. This point is superbly exemplified by the actions towards the protection of Buckbeak the hippogriff by Harry Potter and Hermione Granger. He was wrongly accused and sentenced to death because of misunderstandings. In the introduction scene of Buckbeak, most students show immediate fear of the creature. Hagrid, of course, is very excited and affectionate towards him and attempts to alleviate the concerns the students have towards safety. The distance between all characters show how weary everyone is of the bird/horse. The scene occasionally cuts to wide shots showing the students …show more content…
very many yards away from Buckbeak, practically hiding in the very corner of the field. Hagrid is much closer to the hippogriff, showing his ease with him. The colors and lighting in the scene convey a tone of lightness and fun. It’s very bright and green, giving a sense that nothing horribly bad is going to happen. However, after the short flight of Harry and Buckbeak, Draco Malfoy decides that everything is too relaxed, and ends up paying the price. Because of Draco’s passivity and disregard of respect towards the creature, Buckbeak ends up hurting him. There is absolutely no reason not to expect an animal to lash out when it feels threatened; however because of Draco’s superiority complex, he fails to see how his injury is his fault and ends up actually bringing the animal to court, where it is sentenced to death. The fate of Buckbeak was left entirely to a court of people who did not take into account the ways of the animal, and there was nobody to defend him. The hippogriff could never have been able to stand up for himself, obviously, because of the language barrier between animal and human. Therefore, Harry and Hermione take it upon themselves to save the creature from his undeserved punishment. As stated by Mary Douglas, in her book Purity and Danger, “it seems that if a person [or in this place, animal] has no place in the social system and is therefore a marginal being, all precaution against danger must come from others,” (Douglas 121). This means that when one cannot help themselves, others, usually stronger or more powerful others, must take a stand and protect them. Douglas goes on to explain an example of a person with mental health problems, and the placement of them as “outside” society’s circle only after having spent time in an institution.
Throughout their lives, as long as they were just living at home, supposedly normal, they were perfectly fine and nobody cared that they were mentally ill. They are accepted, even if they have their quirks. Once spending any time in an institution for the mentally ill, however, things are different. People talk, saying there must be some dark reason they were put in there. There is literally absolutely no difference in these people except for the fact that they were in an institution. Therefore they get labeled as harmful or problematic. The same happened with Buckbeak. There was nothing at all against him as he just existed, but once he got involved even the smallest bit with the law, he was labelled “dangerous” and a “threat to society”, despite doing nothing wrong, nothing but protecting himself from a perceived threat. One argument against him, one scratch on a boy from a family of powerful, albeit slightly evil, wizards high up in the government, and Buckbeak is sentenced to die. And of course there is no way anyone would be able to argue with them. Hagrid himself is an outsider, half human and half giant, he is an anomaly, and people tend not to take him seriously because of prejudices against beings that are not human, treating them as monsters. Therefore, the corrupted Ministry would never take his side over the side of the powerful family with much political
influence. Harry and Hermione then take it upon themselves to protect the creature that can do nothing for himself. They themselves are kids, however, and why would the government ever listen to two thirteen year olds who have a great bias towards the defendant in this matter? In that regards, they cannot protect Buckbeak in the legal way, so they end up smuggling him away right under the Minister and Executioner’s noses. The two heroes know that Buckbeak cannot protect himself from this terrible fate, and so they do everything they can to help, including actually going back in time. In conclusion, Harry Potter and Prisoner of Azkaban is very strong in the theme of stronger characters taking care of those who are unable to protect themselves. The protagonists of the story believe very strongly that people should help others in any way they can, which is what Harry and Hermione do when they save Buckbeak from his unfair and undeserved sentence of death.
Elie and Liesel live and survive during the time of World War II. Both characters face the harsh reality of the terrible period of time they are living in. The memoir, Night and the movie, “The Book Thief” share similarities and dissimilarities that make Elie and Liesel both stand out. Due to the loss of family, determination to live, and fear helps both of them survive the war, but depends on the different reactions, mistreated for different reasons, and hope.
On April 3rd, 1963, the Birmingham campaign began and people were protesting against racism and injustice. The non-violent campaign was coordinated by King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights. However, King was roughly arrested with other main leaders of the campaign on April 12th for disobeying the rules of “no parading, demonstrating, boycotting, trespassing and picketing”. While jailed, King read a letter (“A call for unity”) written by eight white Alabama clergymen against King and his methods from the newspaper. In the letter, the clergymen stated that the campaign were "directed and led in part by outsiders," urging activists to use the courts if rights were being denied rather than to protest. The letter provoked King and “the Letter from Birmingham jail” was a written response to the white clergy men and to defend the strategy of non-violent protesting. Throughout the letter, King used many stylistic writing elements and effective emotional appealing to make people want to join his case.
But if you were different, suffering from a mental disability, you would have been given the job title of Court Jester or Village Idiot. Society mocked intellectually disabled individuals because they were different from the norm, but that is not the worst of it. Carter and VanAndel (2011) leading professionals in the field of Therapeutic Recreation explain the appalling treatment of the mentally disabled during the Middle Ages. These individuals were locked away in dank, dark cells within the walls of the dungeon, hidden from society, (p. 29) all the while tethered to the wall like a wild animal. Even though the times were primitive, little regard or medical attention was awarded to the mentally disabled. French Physician, Philippe Pinel (1745-1826) did not like the treatment the mentally ill received so he decided to advocate on their behalf. He felt all individuals had the right to live as productive members of society. Carter and VanAndel highlight how Pinel ventured out to change the living conditions for the intellectually disabled. (p. 30) Unfortunately, during the Victorian Era society felt demon possession caused the mental illness. In some instances, individuals were killed in the process of exorcism. Many years later intellectually disabled individuals were housed in prisons with murderers and thieves. They were treated like common criminals just because they were different. In later years, they were segregated from society and institutionalized. (Carter & VanAndel, 2011, p. 31) Throughout the years, the treatment of the mentally disabled individuals changed. Today, in some areas the mentally disabled are still segregated; however, the stigma is still present. They attend schools that are specifically designed to support their needs and teachers trained to instruct individuals with disabilities. The living conditions have also
... has an overwhelming grasp on the conception's society generates on the mentally ill/disabled. I, myself, aren't a fan of wrestling but can see where people, especially the youth formulate their ideas on these people. But It's not only the WWF that portrays such a negative view on this social group, but other TV shows, such as 'ER', or movies like 'Silence of the Lambs." When it all comes down to it, "violence involving mental illness is even more terrifying, more morbidly fascinating to the public, more likely to receive splashy coverage, and more important more likely to sell than other kinds of violence" (Wrestling 7). It is easy to fall into a negative attitude towards mentally ill people, and if society doesn't view programs such as the WWF critically, then such shows will continue to strive, creating more and more stereotypes.
In the 1800’s people with mental illnesses were frowned upon and weren't treated like human beings. Mental illnesses were claimed to be “demonic possessions” people with mental illnesses were thrown into jail cells, chained to their beds,used for entertainment and even killed. Some were even slaves, they were starved and forced to work in cold or extremely hot weather with chains on their feet. Until 1851, the first state mental hospital was built and there was only one physician on staff responsible for the medical, moral and physical treatment of each inmate. Who had said "Violent hands shall never be laid on a patient, under any provocation.
There’s always been the argument of “Which is better?” when it comes to book versus movie. In the case of To Kill A Mockingbird, in my opinion, the movie lacks certain details needed to really see some of the themes Harper Lee is trying to get across. The movie leaves out some important characters. It also leaves out many certain events that are significant to the character development of Scout and Jem. These things, I believe are crucial to the story and message of To Kill A
The saga continues when Kutniss Everdeen, the “Mockingjay,” and District 13 wager war against the autocratic Capitol.
Comparing the Families in Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban and Hoban’s The Mouse and His Child
... of these wards that the term “insane asylum” has negative connotations. Mentally ill people did not get the proper treatment and care they needed, and to this day have not received the proper justice that they deserve.
How does one write a book about the horrors of the holocaust and portray the German society as much a victim as the others? Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief published in the year 2005 does exactly that, weaving a story in its 552-paged glory and opening a window into the life of the little Liesel Meminger. However, that’s not it. It’s just the tip of the iceberg that The Book Thief really is. What makes The Book Thief truly a different book to come by is not its concept but its narrator. He says he can be agreeable, affable and amiable and that that’s just the A’s. What he says he definitely isn’t- is nice because quiet correctly Death never is nice. Yes, The Book Thief is narrated by the wry, often sardonic and darkly humorous but secretly compassionate, Death.
Corrigan, Watson and Ottati (2003) argue this strong stigma has legitimized a historically inequitable system of treatment for those with mental illness. As far back as the Middle Ages, the mentally ill were sent to prisons because they were perceived as dangerous. Beginning in the 19th century, they were transitioned to asylums and hospitals due to the widely held belief that they were not only dangerous, but also i...
For this assignment, I decided to do my film review on To Kill a Mockingbird (Mulligan, R., & Pakula, A. (Directors). (1962). To Kill a Mockingbird[Motion picture on VHS]. United States of America.) I have a personal connection to this film because it is one of my most beloved novels by Harper Lee. I have never watched the film so it was a nice experience to see the characters I have loved for years come to life just before my eyes. The film particularly focuses on a white family living in the South of the United States in the 1930s. The two siblings, Jem and Scout Finch, undergo major changes while experiencing evil and injustice in their small town of Maycomb. Jem and Scout’s father is named Atticus and he is a well-respected man in the town as well as being a lawyer.
Throughout Harry Houdini’s career and life, he had many different accomplishments that made him one of the greatest magicians in history. I felt that making a magazine was the best option to portray Houdini. With the magazine I was able to talk about everything that occurred in his life, career, and after his death. In the magazine I talked about his unexpected death, road to fame, magic career, after death experiences, and other magicians. All of these experiences help Houdini become the man he was.
Imagine if your work was to be published, but the publishers required you to change even the most minute detail to fit their need. This work would be unrecognizable, not at all what you wanted to convey with your story. This is essentially what happens with every movie adaptation of a popular novel, and readers are always enraged. One such case is The Book Thief, by Markus Zusak, which was unnecessarily changed. The lack of many important details in the movie adaptation of The Book Thief shows how obvious it is that movies must stay true to the book for full effect.
One of the most read series in all literature is Harry Potter. The seven-book succession has sold over 400 million copies and has been translated into over sixty languages. What is it that makes this series so wildly famous? What is it about the boy who lived that makes frenzied readers flock to their local bookstore at midnight on the day of the release to buy the latest installment? How is a story set in a world that doesn’t exist about wizards, witches, magic, and mystical creatures so popular? The series has been able to earn its spot on the New York Times Bestseller list and has granted author J.K. Rowling multiple awards because it is relatable. It is not the setting or the events in the plot of the story that we relate to. We relate to what Harry, his friends, mentors, teachers, caretakers, and even enemies feel. Harry is in a lot of ways exactly like us. He represents some of the good characteristics that all of us have as well as the bad. The series as a whole, is about one thing that is stressed over and over again in the novels, love. The Harry Potter series is one of the most read sequences of novels because the central theme is love and self-sacrifice, and readers are looking for a novel that shows them just that.