Hard Times Themes

1146 Words3 Pages

Hard Times Charles Dickens was known to be very controversial and outspoken in his books and Hard Times was no exception. Hard Times takes place in the industrial-centered city of Coketown, England where Dickens’ clearly attempts to expose the massive inequality between economic/social classes as well as the outright narcissism of the middle to upper classes who are only concerned with making a profit in the most practical/efficient way. Charles Dickens is in no way subtle throughout this book and attempted to repeat his main theme constantly in order for the reader to quickly understand what was trying to be said. In Hard Times, Charles Dickens seems to suggest that the introduction and execution of an industrialized world has forced humans …show more content…

Fancy is seen regularly throughout Hard Times. What is considered “fact”, is simply a matter of opinion according to Dickens. For instance, Bounderby goes on a rant about the workers and how they need “to be fed on turtle soup and venison, with a gold spoon, as a good many of ’em do!” However, the workers themselves believe that they are hardworking individuals who are being treated unfairly by their employers. It seems as though that the book is suggesting that without fancy, facts would become too destructive in the current industrial era. For instance, since Gradgrind forced his children to grow up in an environment devoid of what is called “fancy,” Louisa is incapable of creating a connection with other people, such as being unable to love Mr. Bounderby, and her brother Tom cares little about others, as evidenced by him allowing Stephen to be credited with robbing a bank. The adopted sister Sissy, gives them both the fancy in which they were longing for throughout their lives. Sissy served as the balance between fact and fancy, suggesting that both are needed in order to have a healthy, successful life in the new industrialized world which is devoid of creativity and imagination. Due to Sissy’s influence, Louisa was able to understand her own …show more content…

.” Louisa believes that she has no other choice than to confront her father Gradgrind and speaks of the childhood she believes was taken from her, confessing “Father, you have trained me from my cradle...How could you give me life, and take from me all the inappreciable things that raise it from the state of conscious death? Where are the graces of my soul? Where are the sentiments of my heart? What have you done, O father, what have you done, with the garden that should have bloomed once, in this great wilderness here!” Also speaking of the marriage which she didn’t want and of the man whom she truly wished to marry, “When I was irrevocably married…There seemed to be a near affinity between us. I only wondered it should be worth his while, who cared for nothing else, to care so much for me.” Breath taken from the honesty shown by his daughter, Gradgrind comes to the realization that his methods and philosophies based on “fact over fancy” were responsible for Louisa’s inability to connect with others and his son Tom’s uncaring nature. Dickens appears to be hammering the notion that fancy is needed when the world is filled with too many facts. Without being able to experience a childhood and engaging in social situations, children will be unable to communicate with their peers properly and unable to act appropriately in public

Open Document