Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The code of hammurabi
The code of hammurabi author
The code of hammurabi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The state of Mesopotamia during Hammurabi’s reign went through a political, social, and cultural structure revolution. Unlike early kings of Mesopotamia, Hammurabi sought to consolidate power through a new political system known as Hammurabi’s Code. This system also brought about changes in the social structure as it supported the king’s authority in all matters throughout the state as well as implementing a new economy. Private economy, a significant part of the social structure, gave people the ability to pay taxes through material goods instead of money. Instead, the entrepreneurs of the private economy would trade those goods for silver and then pay the state’s taxes. For cultural changes, public art and heroic tales such as The Epic of Gilgamesh came about and lived on as
They received the same consideration as men in matters of marriage and household.
Lastly, law one hundred ninety-six says, “If a man destroy the eye of a man (gentleman), they shall destroy his eye.” (Pollard 86) This basically says that whatever violence one should commit against someone, that person has the option to return said violence without consequence.
While somewhat vengeful, it is logical for the era. Like the previous laws, it stands in a progressive light, if only through its acknowledgement of the equality of men, despite their situations. It does, however, follow the more bloody and less policed lifestyle of the late
Mesopotamian era.
Overall, Hammurabi’s Code can be said to be fair. Naturally, it must be looked through a certain, ancient lens, but the laws can be said to be fair for the era. The era could be thought of as a land being ruled more through politics than conquering, considering the extensive law code. It was not simply a land ruled by a distant king. Instead, it was ruled by a just king with specific laws for a wide set of situations. Conclusively, the late Mesopotamian era was perhaps one of the most well-ruled
Hammurabi is best known for his succession in writing down the first complete set of laws, titled Hammurabi’s Code. He strived as a king to bring protection, fairness, and justice to the weak of society using laws from the God of justice, Shamash. Hammurabi’s Code was written on a large stone pillar called a stele. In addition to writing a set of 282 laws, he expanded the territory of Babylon northward and westward, encouraged agriculture, and oversaw the erection of many buildings and temples. One may argue that since Hammurabi changed and eliminated some of the laws before he published the complete set, he was changed by the times. However, revising some of the laws was necessary to ensure the best protection and fairness for the people. Overall, King Hammurabi laid the foundation for the laws that we have today and his legacy continues on in our justice
Family law is just in Hammurabi's code of law. Law 129“ If a married lady is caught (in adultery) with another
In the section of family laws in Hammurabi's Code of Laws there are clear examples that the laws were just. Laws 129, 148, 168, and 195 all support the idea that Hammurabi's Code was fair to the Babylonians. In Document C, which is all four of the laws I just mentioned; it says in Law 129 that if an espoused woman is caught having an affair with another man, they both will be tied together and thrown into the sea. I think this law is fair because doing adultery with someone is a very bad thing and deserves a harsh punishment like death. In Law 148 it states that if a man has married a woman but a disease has reached her and he wants to marry another woman, the man is allowed to marry the second woman. He is not allowed to divorce the diseased woman. The woman with the disease can live in the man's house and he has to take care of her until the woman passes away. I This law is fair because it protects the woman with the disease by making her husband take care of h...
...hold absolute power but is equally controlled by the actions of the people as they are considered to be a servant for the people.
The formers of the Hammurabi’s Code of Laws surely created strict rules with severe punishments for their violation. In fact, these laws played a big role in organization of Mesopotamian society. Reading these laws, reader may learn about ideals people of Mesopotamia had about crimes, their attitude to the lower and higher social classes, and legal rights between men and women. Reading the laws I noticed that many crimes were punished by death penalty. Many laws tell that guilty person has to pay the same price for the physical harm one did to another person or one’s relative. For instance: law 196 states (encyclopedia.com): “ If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.” In addition, at that time, people were penalized to death for many crimes or wrongdoings that almost never would be penalized with capital punishment at a modern time. Among such felony and misdemeanors are stealing, robbery, accusation, adultery, and desertion. Hammurabi’s Code also, reveals inequality between social classes. Slaves were not treated by the laws the same as free-born people. According to the Code of Hammurabi, women had some legal rights, but these rights were not equal to men’s. Married women had a right to divorce as well as men. In fact, in order to acquire the right for divorce, a woman has to find a reasonable explanation for her desire, and only than the divorce could be possible.
Who decided what was right or wrong and how order would be made in ancient societies? There couldn 't have just been a constitution that everyone followed in the beginning of time. People of ancient times must have come to some agreement to keep everyone well governed to prevent chaos and destruction to society. While undefined, I believe that most theorists addressed social order by defining social rules and ways of living that were believed to be fair for all. Such theorists as Aristotle, Hammurabi and Machiavelli were some of the many who had their own opinions on how the believed, “Government” per-say was created and how it should be ran.
The author of the Code also makes some key assumptions while writing his laws. Hammurabi must assume that the members of his kingdom have the same values and morals that he does. He writes as if everyone will agree with each law written, and makes no provision for members of society to disagree with him. Hammurabi also assumes that the punishment he prescribes will be enough to deter crime and prevent repeat offenders. When prescribing the incentives given to doctors, Hammurabi made assumptions about how much money it would take to encourage doctors to practice medicine and shipbuilders to build ships.
Hammurabi’s Code provides evidence for early documents that signify law and order. For instance, Hammurabi’s says in his code if a man wrongs another with his false accusations, he shall be subjected to death (1, 3). His laws illustrate a judicial system in which someone has to pay someone that they wronged in either the same way that they wronged him or through money depending on the person’s social status. It is also said in his code of law that there were penalties for those who disobeyed his laws. For example, Hammurabi says, “If that man do not pay attention to my words…may the great god, the father of the gods, ...
The code of Hammurabi was the first set of written laws to have been created. There were a collection of 282 laws which were recorded. Hammurabi states in his codes the reason for his laws. As stated in The Making of the West by Hunt, "to show Shamash that he had fulfilled the social responsibility imposed on him as a divinely installed monarch" (p.16). This meant that Hammurabi clearly felt that he was accountable for the justice and morals of his people, and that they should abide by them. One of the major points of the moral code included equal punishment under the same class. Code 196 states "If a noble man puts out the eye of another noble man, his eyes shall be put out." This clearly implies that the equal punishment law was severely followed by the Babylonians. Another important point was how woman were of lesser importance compared to men. Code 132 states how if a woman is not caught sleeping with another man she should jump in the water for the sake of her husband. This shows how woman were expected to be faithful and follow by their husbands side. While, if a man was to create adultery with his daughter he would only be exiled. The making of the West by Hunt states "A wife could divorce her husband for cruelty; a husband could divorce his wife for any reason" (p.16). This evidently shows how indisputably biased Hammurabi was towards woman in that society. Slaves' conducts and rules were also listed in the codes. They had absolutely no rights at all, even if they were to be killed by another being.
The capital of this civilization was the city of Babylon. To keep peace among people living so closely together, they needed rules. King Hammurabi, who ruled around 2000 BCE, drew up the first recorded set of laws. The Code of Hammurabi, as these laws were called, set down harsh penalties for those who broke the laws like, “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” You might question why and how did they come up with that type of code? That’s a good question! The creation of “the Code” was a tremendous achievement for not only Babylonian society but for the entire Mesopotamian region as King Hammurabi was ruler over all of that area. Its conception can be considered to be the first culmination of the laws of different regions into a single, logical text. Hammurabi wanted to be an efficient ruler and realized that this could be achieved through the use of a common set of laws which applied to all territories and all citizens who fell under his rule. But how and where did put these codes at? This is when the writing system came
There has not been a true pure polity regime that has existed throughout the centuries. The
Early societies were based on a simple code of law: "an eye for an eye
After the Commercial Law came the Penal Law. This had to do with the issue of crime. The laws were unusually harsh do to their ineducation. Despite this the wealthy class usually enjoyed more freedom from the law than the lower classes. There was no jury in the court back in the times of Babylon. The code of Hammurabi was like an eye for an eye punishment. If you killed someone than you would be killed.
Women did not control her own wealth, so therefore, a woman’s family wealth, was controlled by her father or her husband. Law 128 in the Code of Hammurabi states, “If a man take a wife and do not arrange with her the (proper) contracts, that woman is not a (legal) wife.”1 (Hammurabi 45). A woman would receive a dowry once she was married and left her family. A dowry is a financial gift such as money, property, or goods, which was a gift to her husband once they got married. Once a man married a woman, he then had access to the family’s dowry and the property, money, or goods were then, controlled by him. If the man were no longer married to the woman and if the woman died childless, then the dowry returned back to the father of her family. If the father has already passed away, then the dowry was returned to the woman’s brothers. If the woman had any children that were boys, then the boy, or brothers, would share equally2 (“WOMEN…”). If women wanted out of the marriage, then she would take the dowry with her and go back to her father’s house. The father would then receive the dowry back. Law 138 in the Code of Hammurabi says, “If a man would put away his wife who has not borne him children, he shall give her money to the amount of her marriage settlement and he shall make good to her the dowry which she brought from her father’s house and then he may put her away.”3 (Hammurabi 49). In reality
A single example of the importance of a strong and competent ruler or government – as well