Hamlet: Soldier-V-Scholar Conflict

711 Words2 Pages

The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is set in the thirteenth century in the country of Denmark. The story is about the protagonist’s, Hamlet, quest to avenge his father
King Hamlet. In the story, Hamlet is a victim of the soldier-versus-scholar conflict. After discovering who murdered his father, Hamlet suffers with the aforementioned soldier-versus-scholar conflict by his failure to act on his intention of avenging his father and eventually acting on his intention when it is too late because he is on the verge of dying.
Because of his experience as a scholar attending the University of Wittenburg, Hamlet contemplates revenge on King Claudius for killing his father. After an incorporeal entity tells him that King Claudius his father King …show more content…

Using this antic disposition, Hamlet discovers that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, two of his best friends, are working for King Claudius. Due to the antic disposition, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern think that Hamlet will not realize that they were sent by Claudius, but Hamlet sees “a kind of confession in [their] looks” (2.2.289). Guildenstern eventually admits that the King sent Rosencrantz and him. In addition to discovering that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are working for Claudius, Hamlet’s antic disposition helps him to discover that Ophelia is not on his side but is, in fact, working for Claudius just like Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. In a conversation with Ophelia, Hamlet suddenly asks her where her father is which implies that he heard something. She responds that her father is at home. From that point on Hamlet sees Ophelia as a conspirer against him and says that he has “heard of… [her] paintings too, well enough. God hath given… [her] one face, and… [she] make[s]… [herself] another” (3.1.152-153). Without his experience as a scholar, Hamlet may not have been able to deduce that Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and Ophelia are working for King

Open Document