The Crippling Effect of Overthinking
It is often said that the easiest way to drive a person mad is to leave them alone with nothing but their thoughts. When one overthinks, it can become a toxic habit that can cause more damage than many may realize. Oftentimes, overthinking a situation can lead to serious emotional distress and can lead to the inability to make decisions quickly and effectively. In William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet is a thinker rather than a man of action. Hamlet’s inclination to think about every situation is proven by his multiple soliloquys throughout the entire play. Throughout these numerous moments of thought and contemplation, Hamlet is unable to make decisions confidently and, consequently, is hesitant to follow through with his initial intentions. Hamlet is unable to take swift revenge on Claudius because of his constant need to overthink.
To begin, throughout the entire play, Hamlet is besieged with persistent
…show more content…
thoughts of suicide and death upon learning of his father’s death. Hamlet overthinks how to cope with his loss and depression by continuously contemplating life or death. This constant overthinking ultimately distracts him from carrying out his intended plan for revenge, thus causing a delay in killing Claudius. Even before Hamlet discovers that Claudius has murdered his father, Hamlet proves that he is a character who is often conflicted and, therefore, shows a persistent need to overthink. In Hamlet’s first soliloquy, he expresses his longing for suicide, “Oh, that this too, too sullied flesh would melt,/ Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew,/ Or that the Everlasting had not fixed/ His canon 'gainst self-slaughter!” (Shakespeare 1.2.129-132). Hamlet is conflicted as he wants to kill himself but realizes that suicide goes against his religion. This demonstrates that the overpowering strength of Hamlet’s thoughts can cause indecision and hesitancy, and consequently, cripples him from acting upon his initial intention of suicide. Hamlet’s tendency to overthink is further highlighted in his second soliloquy when he, again, explores the idea of suicide by contemplating, To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them. (3.1. 57-61) Hamlet, for a second time, contemplates suicide as he is depressed as a result of his father’s death. He weighs out the consequences of both life and death and wonders whether it is easier to live or to die. Hamlet’s thoughts have an intense power over him, which paralyze him, leaving him unable to act or make a decision, thus causing a delay in his revenge. Moreover, Hamlet delays killing Claudius because he overthinks the legitimacy of Claudius’ guilt. Initially, when Hamlet senior’s ghost demands Hamlet to seek revenge against Claudius, Hamlet is eager to carry out the plan. Hamlet expresses this determination to kill Claudius when he tells the ghost, “Haste me to know ’t, that I, with wings as swift/ As meditation or the thoughts of love,/ May sweep to my revenge.” (1.5.29-31) However, because Hamlet tends to overthink everything, he begins to doubt the ghost and overanalyzes its true intentions. In a soliloquy, Hamlet expresses his skepticism and considers that, The spirit that [he has] seen May be the devil, and the devil hath power T' assume a pleasing shape. Yea, and perhaps Out of my weakness and my melancholy, As he is very potent with such spirits, Abuses me to damn me. (2.2.596-601) After contemplating the legitimacy of the ghost, Hamlet begins to think that perhaps the ghost is the devil and therefore, is not telling the truth. Hamlet is uncertain of the ghost’s claims, hence creating a hesitation and delay to murder Claudius. Additionally, due to Hamlet’s overanalyzing tendencies, he proposes a way in which he can verify Claudius’s guilt. Hamlet decides to analyze Claudius’s reaction after watching a play where the actors put on a show that resembles the way in which Claudius killed Hamlet senior. Hamlet proposes that, “The play’s the thing/ Wherein [he’ll] catch the conscience of the king.” (2.2.602-03) Hamlet believes that the play is an opportunity to establish a more reliable basis for Claudius’s guilt since he is uncertain of the ghost’s claims. This plan ultimately stems from Hamlet’s need to overthink and verify the authenticity of the ghost’s words. As a result, Hamlet puts his revenge on Claudius on hold, creating a delay in killing Claudius. In addition, even after Hamlet legitimizes Claudius’s guilt, he still delays carrying out his revenge because he overthinks the result of Claudius’s death. Even when presented with a perfect opportunity to kill Claudius, Hamlet is hesitant to follow through because his thoughts overpower his ability to take action. When Claudius is alone in the chapel, praying, Hamlet is presented with a perfect chance to strike. Hamlet thinks to himself, “Now might I do it pat, now he is praying;/ And now I’ll do it” (3.3.74-75). Initially, Hamlet realizes that he can kill Claudius at this moment with ease. He is eager to finally do the deed. However, shortly after, Hamlet begins to think about the situation. He begins to second-guess himself, That would be scanned. A villain kills my father, and, for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send To heaven. Oh, this is hire and salary, not revenge. (3.3.76-80) Due to Hamlet’s constant intrusive thoughts, he begins to overanalyze the result of Claudius’s death.
Hamlet believes that since Claudius is praying, his sins are forgiven and, therefore, he will be sent to heaven once he is killed. Hamlet decides to wait until Claudius commits a sin so that, “…his soul may be as damned and black/ As hell, whereto it goes.” (3.3.95-96). Hamlet’s excessive thinking about the consequences of Claudius’s death ultimately causes him to procrastinate his revenge. In A.C. Bradley’s article entitled, The Shakespearean Tragic Hero, Bradley explains that, “In almost all [tragic hero’s] we observe a marked one-sidedness…a fatal tendency to identify the whole being with one interest, object, passion, or habit of mind.” (Bradley) As the tragic hero in the play, Hamlet definitely demonstrates a “one-sidedness” in his character by lacking balance between thought and action. Hamlet’s surplus of thoughts overpower his desire and ability to take action, which ultimately inhibits him from killing
Claudius. Finally, it is only when Hamlet does not have a chance to overthink, that he executes his plan for revenge. Once Hamlet realizes that he is dying and does not have much time left, he finally decides to kill Claudius. Shortly after Hamlet kills Claudius, he reveals to Horatio, “O, I die, Horatio;/ The potent poison quite o’ercrows my spirit” (5.2.345-46). Since Hamlet knows that he is dying, he realizes that this is his last opportunity to kill Claudius. Therefore, with his dying breath, he finally commits the deed. In the last moments of his life, Hamlet does not have the time to think about his revenge. Instead, he acts in spur of the moment and does not put much thought into his actions. This absence of overthinking leads Hamlet to finally take action and kill Claudius. To conclude, Hamlet’s delay in killing Claudius is due to his constant, overpowering thoughts, which leave him unable to act. Since Hamlet fails to find a balance between thought and action, he is unable to make decisions quickly, and oftentimes overthinks situations. This overthinking causes confusion, doubt and skepticism within Hamlet, ultimately delaying his revenge. Overthinking situations can have a serious crippling effect on a person, and when one is left alone with only their thoughts, they are unable to act upon their initial intentions.
Even though Hamlet is a prince, he has little control over the course of his life. In that time many things were decided for the princes and princesses such as their education and even who they married. This was more or less the normal way of life for a child of the monarch. But in the case of Hamlet, any of the control he thought he had, fell away with the murder of his father. Having his father, the king, be killed by his own brother, sent Hamlet into a state of feeling helpless and out of control. Cooped up in a palace with no real outlet, he tries to control at least one aspect of his life. Hamlet deliberately toys with Ophelia's emotions in order to feel in control of something since he cannot control the situation with Claudius.
The vengeance of his father 's death is the prime cause of Hamlet 's obsession with perfection, his tendencies of over thinking philosophically, and idealistically, are what cause Hamlet 's delay. Hamlet is exposed to multiple opportunities to take the murderer of his father, Claudius ' life, the most notable being when Hamlet stumbles upon Claudius alone, praying; when about to act Hamlet says "When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, or in the incestuous pleasure of his bed, at gaming, swearing or about some act that has no relish of salvation in 't: then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven and that his soul may be as damn 'd and black as hell, whereto it goes"(3.3.90-96) This inability to act when the chance is given exclaims how Hamlet is not willing to send Claudius to heaven and he will only act if he is to arrive in hell, which will in turn fulfill his need for the perfect
... Hamlet does not kill Claudius while the latter is praying, for the Prince does not wish for Claudius' soul to go to heaven. Someone who has lost his mind would not think of possibilities such as this. Hamlet also reflects on his hesitation at avenging his father's death, believing that his hesitance is "one part wisdom and ever three parts coward" (IV, iv.
Hamlet first visible incapability is seen when he fails to take action on his suicidal thoughts due to his rationality. When Hamlet questions “to be or not to be” he wishes that “the everlasting had not fixed his canon 'gainst self slaughter'” (3.1.56, 1.2.132). Hamlet life has lost all meaning, but the fear of “the undiscovered country” (3.1.80) is stopping him from taking action, and he is aware that not committing suicide will create an obligation and commitment to fulfill the murder of Claudius. His ability to act is affected as he cannot decide on what action to take, and as a result, he does not act on either. In addition to Hamlet's incapability of committing suicide, he procrastinates on avenging his father. When given the opportunity to kill Claudius, Hamlet claims that a confessional murder would be “hire and salary not revenge” and draws back his sword for “a more horrid hent” (3.3.80-89). His rationality causes him to over think, and the irony is that revenge could have been satisfied if he kills Claudius in the confessional, as Claudius was not really praying not repenting his sins. Hamlets over thinking merely complicated his mission, and only prolonged the revenge necessary. Furthermore, Hamlet has an incapability of taking action to fix the relationships with the two women in his life, Gertrude
As Hamlet struggles to find the meaning behind morality, we see a clear contrast between his ideology and Claudius’. Hamlet is unable to decipher exactly between what is wrong and what is right; and although he considers himself a person of good intentions, he tends to find the line between right and wrong blurred on many occasions. As the play progresses, it can be noticed that Hamlet becomes much more inward. He finds that he overthinks every detail about his life, and his future involving revenge, as he says “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all” (III.i.83). The irony of this statement is found in the fact that he is upset with himself for not taking action and being a coward; however by doing this he is overthinking the situation. While the play progresses, it is seen that Hamlet’s inability to act is his demise. So, a clear contradiction in Hamlet’s character can be recognized. He contradicts himself often when it comes to the idea of revenge; as he considers it to be immoral to kill someone, but at the same time disc...
As illustrated through his speeches and soliloquies Hamlet has the mind of a true thinker. Reinacting the death of his father in front of Claudius was in itself a wonderful idea. Although he may have conceived shcemes such as this, his mind was holding him back at the same time. His need to analyze and prove everythin certain drew his time of action farther and farther away. Hamlet continuously doubted himself and whether or not the action that he wanted to take was justifiable. The visit that Hamlet recieves from his dead father makes the reader think that it is Hamlet's time to go and seek revenge. This is notthe case. Hamlet does seem eager to try and take the life of Claudius in the name of his father, but before he can do so he has a notion, what if that was not my father, but an evil apparition sending me on the wrong path? This shows that even with substantial evidence of Claudius' deeds, Hamlet's mind is not content.
Morality is the next big challenge that Hamlet faces. Hamlet needs to morally justify the murder of the king to himself before he can go through with it, "Hamlet was restrained by conscience or a moral scruple; he could not satisfy himself that it was right to avenge his father"(Bradley 80). This idea connects directly with the idea that Hamlet thinks too much.
In the book Hamlet a lot of people over look him and think that he goes crazy but Hamlet was just being smart about his situation. He is ultimately the cause of his own down fall for trying to do something good. It comes down to why do people think that Hamlet is crazy, what was Hamlets plan behind acting crazy, did it help him or hurt him to pretend to be crazy, and how do people look and treat him differently after they think that he goes crazy. What could have happen if he didn't pretend to act crazy, but on the flip side he wouldn't have got any answers if he didn't act crazy. So in my mind he had no other options it was a lose lose situation for him. If you’re trying to tell the truth but someone no matter what you say
Hamlet does not initially have a strong enough will to act solely on revenge. Even though Hamlet had proclaimed that he would be "swift" and "sweep to my revenge,"In the "rogue and peasant slave" soliloquy, Hamlet admits that he has been "unpregnant of my cause" and wonders whether he is a "coward". Not until Hamlet becomes completely fed up with his own inaction, does he finally examine the guilt of Claudius. However this task is thwarted when Hamlet witnesses Claudius praying. His will is rationalized by the notion that Claudius' soul might escape eternal damnation. Hamlet finally address his "dull revenge" in his climactic soliloquy admitting," I do not know/ Why yet I live to say This thing's to do/ Sith I have cause and will and strength and means/ To do't" Here Hamlet finally swears against his previous inaction "O! From this time forth,/ My thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth"
Hamlet became reckless in his attempts to exact revenge against Claudius to send his father off to heaven. The tragic flaw that causes Hamlet’s downfall is his indecisive nature, as Hamlet spends adequate amounts of time planning to avenge his father’s death, and hence loses time to inflict revenge. By allowing these distractions and interruptions to come into play, it causes the already difficult task to become even less possible. Consequently, as Hamlet further delays killing the King with his indecisiveness, he puts additional people’s lives into jeopardy, and leads him towards his own tragic downfall. Hamlet’s indecisive nature is displayed in the soliloquy “To be, or not to be – that is the question”; this quote further shows Hamlet’s inability to take conclusive action. In the end, Hamlet simulated madness, to finish all possibilities of justification behind his
Two central ideas of Hamlet are a vengeance for a wronged father and mystery after death. How does Hamlet’s apparent madness impact these central ideas to reveal a theme? Hamlet’s apparent insanity left a strong impact on others. It also affected himself in many ways. Hamlet’s apparent madness affects the central ideas to reveal a theme through the progression of his madness, his impact on others, and his pretense of being mad.
To begin, Hamlet’s pensiveness leads him onto the path of his own demise. Hamlet always spends his time thinking; whether it be about his father’s untimely death, his mother’s incestuous marriage, or the revenge he plans for Claudius. However, this creates a fatal problem for him. Firstly, when he is not pursuing or thinking about revenge, he often wastes his time just thinking. This can be seen in his infamous speech, where he spends much time contemplating suicide.
There are many reasons why Hamlet had his downfall. One being his decision to keeping the murder of his father a secret. Another one being the betrayals of his closest friends. Perhaps if Guildenstern or Rosencrantz had been there for Hamlet, to rely and place trust upon, he might not had to fell so alone. A little sympathy from his girlfriend Ophelia, and even his mother Gertrude would have been nice as well. Unfortunately Ophelia is held back from Hamlet, due to her father. Gertrude marries his uncle Claudius, who is responsible for his fathers death, and is looking to kill him next. And Guildenstern and Rosencrantz are ordered by Claudius to spy on Hamlet, and betray him as a friend.
Throughout the course of the discussion, a number of topics were discussed regarding Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. The initial discussion began with the contemplation of whether Hamlet is a hero or not. Along with this raised another question, whether Hamlet is morally conscious with his thoughts and actions. Parallels between the Hamlet’s and Laretes’s desire for revenge were drawn, as well as Hamlet’s apparent love for Ophelia. Eventually the conversation shifted from analysis of specific characters to viewing the work as a whole. The topic of the various statements on different situations Shakespeare addresses within this play was brought up as well. The class also reflected upon Shakespeare’s message about the concept of revenge. The discussion
... be overstepping the boundaries of morality. Not only does Hamlet want to kill Claudius, but he also wants to damn his soul. This contrasts greatly with Claudius’ act of murder, which is carried out with no preference for the victim’s afterlife. As a result of Hamlet’s tendency to over-think situations, his mission of vengeance is once again delayed.