Hamilton By Alexaon Chernow Summary

953 Words2 Pages

Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow is a biography detailing the life of the controversial founding father. Chernow provides in-depth information about every part of Hamilton’s life, from his childhood to his untimely death. The biography starts off in the West Indies, where Hamilton born to Rachel Faucette Levien and James Hamilton. There is some speculation as to when Hamilton was born, but Chernow believes he was born in the year 1755. His birth, however, was quite contentious since his parents were not married, making him a bastard. Alexander Hamilton's early life was filled with grief. His father left the family and his mother died of disease soon, leaving Hamilton an orphan. In his teenage years, Hamilton clerked on the island until a …show more content…

Chernow always writes Hamilton as a victim in times of conflict, which, at times, doesn’t make sense. Hamilton was a very aggressive man who had an incessant need to defend his honor. He would often challenge other men to duels and write scuttlebutt about his political rivals in newspapers using pseudonyms. Chernow makes these activities sound acceptable when Hamilton did them, but if one of his rivals committed the same acts, Chernow makes them sound immoral. This bias can be very distracting from the biography. For example, when Hamilton has an affair with Maria Reynolds, it is leaked by James Monroe. Chernow makes Hamilton sound like an innocent victim, despite the fact that Hamilton put himself in the situation. Also, when Eliza forgives his adultery, Chernow makes it sound as if Hamilton deserved to be forgiven. After the Reynolds Affair, Chernow seems to attempt to write Hamilton as a family man, which is strange because he really didn’t seem to care about his family until after his sex scandal. It is possible that Hamilton’s guilt led him to care for his family more, but, based on the obvious bias in this biography, it is also possible that Chernow uses this as a strategy to coax the reader into forgiving Hamilton. All in all, Chernow’s bias is just distracting and it seems to weaken the biography as

Open Document