Hall Of Bulls Analysis

1558 Words4 Pages

1. Hall of Bulls
Lascaux Cave, Dordogne, France
Ca 15,000-13,000 BCE.

The Hall of Bulls was a painting which depicted bull like animals that were carved inside a cave in Lascaux, France. The painting depicted animals that probably were hunted and eaten such as bison and deer as well as animals that were feared such as lions and bears (Tedesco). These paintings were created in the years of 15,000-10,000 BCE and were part of a larger period called the Upper Paleolithic time period. The painting is a unique piece of art because it was created in a cave and the methods used to carve and paint these pictures is much different than methods used today. In order to see into the caves, artists at the time used lamps carved out of …show more content…

It was made out of limestone and was unearthed at a site in Willendorf, Austria in 1908. Interestingly, the “Woman of Willendorf” is very small (hand sized) as compared to other work of the time period. The “Woman of Willendorf” is unique in that the sculpture is not fully completed. The figurine is very abstract and reduces the woman to a basic shape which differs from how animals are depicted (Davies 10). The artist did not create a mouth and only had put a suggestion of a nose. The sculpture also had no eyes as well as no resemblances of any eye structure (Davies 10). The figure feature large breasts, an extended belly and pronounced buttocks (Venus). The primary focus seems to be the sexualization of women and the importance of fertility (Ancient Women).
There are many possible purposes of this work. Scholars are not sure if the sculpture represents a specific woman or the ideal woman. The figure may not dictate the representation of a woman at all, “but, rather the notion of reproduction or, as some have argued, the fertile natural world itself” (Davies …show more content…

It was a megalithic structure and represented a large organization of labor and engineering due to the size and weight of the supports and blocks that were used in its creation. There were two types of stones used in the construction, the larger sarsen and the smaller bluestones (Greaney). “The sarsen blocks weigh up to 50 tons a piece, and traveled 200 miles”, indicate the difficulty in moving the stone (Davies 18). What now appears to be a unified design actually happened in four parts. During the middle of the period that it was built, the structure “had grown into a horseshoe-shaped arrangement of five sarsen triliths, encircled by a ring of upright blocks capped with lintel” (Davies16).
There was a purpose for the creation of Stonehenge although it is one that is not backed with many facts. It is to be said that Stonehenge is associated with “the passing of time” and “most also concur that it had a ritual function, perhaps associated with burial” (Davies 16). These two things have led to many believing that Merlin, the magician of King Arthur, created

Open Document