Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should haig be called butcher of the somme essay
Should haig be called butcher of the somme essay
Should haig be called butcher of the somme essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should haig be called butcher of the somme essay
Haig as a Successful Commander
Field Marshal Douglas Haig was one of the most controversial people of
the Great War. While he brought eventual victory, he is accused of
being responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of young men
during 1916 and beyond. I will begin by looking at source C and the
opinions of the fighting man on Haig.
Fred Pearson was an infantryman that fought under Haig, and so might
not have ever met him. His thoughts on Haig are in an angry, annoyed
tone, saying that he's "very bitter, always have been and always will
be" and talks about Haig being "50 kilometres behind the line and
that's about as near as he ever got." This source is reliable as far
as facts go - Haig was that far away. The rest of the source is
personal opinion, but one that seems to be shared by other men of the
time. Other infantrymen of the time have said that it "apparently did
not bother Haig that his war was so much more comfortable than that of
the men" and that "a mate and many others were murdered through the
stupidity of those in authority". This suggests that he did not
inspire respect amongst his men - it is certainly true that even
today, Haig is looked upon as the "butcher of the Somme".
The reason behind this hatred lay in Haig's tactics during the Battle
of the Somme, which was intended to take pressure off the French at
Verdun and wear down the German army. He was a commander in 1900, in
the Boer War, and so his tactics were simply to send wave upon wave of
troops, claiming that "success in battle depends mainly on grit and
determination". This eventually resulted in 450,000 British men dead
for a maximum advance of twelve kilometres. This, understandably,
caused unrest both at the front line and at home. A similar situation
occurred two years later at Passchendaele, in which he continued to
throw troops forward long after his target was no longer tactically
In reading this chapter I came to acknowledge a lot facts that I didn’t realize about the British Zulu war. The battle at Rorke’s drift, and the battle at Isandhlwana are the chapter main focus in book Carnage and Culture. It gave multitudes of information that went well in detail about the battles. After reading the chapter, and researching the information on the war, and comparing the information presented by Victor Davis Hanson I found the information insightful and correct. He backs up his statements with facts and explains how western military forces were so dominate because of tactics, discipline and technology.
Is it true Americans are rightfully notorious for creating inaccurate paradigms of what really happened in historical events Americans are tied to? Has America ever censored historical events in order to protect Americans innocent democratic reputation? After reading, “The Best War Ever” by Michael C.C Adams, I have found the answers to these questions to be yes. Some of the myths that Adams addresses in his book include: 1. America was innocent in world war two and was an ever acting protagonist in the war; 2. World war two or any war for that matter can be, or is a “good war” and bring prosperity to America; 3. War world two brought unity to Americans.
war often, for the sake of his country, but when he did he put in a
... forces to take advantage of situation to shape the battle in his favor. Daring and willing to take calculated risks he was able to effectively negate all of the varying tactics the Indians attempted to employ at him to achieve his victory.
For a united nation to prosper, its people must overcome obstacles and take on numerous responsibilities. Throughout our lives, there are problems occurring continually in our world related to war and combat. During these times of hardship, we must remind ourselves to persevere and continue to defend the country. In addressing the Sylvanus Thayer Award on May 12, 1962, at the city of West Point, New York, General Douglas MacArthur urged Americans to remember the major responsibilities we have as Americans in his speech Duty, Honor, Country. With a position of authority, MacArthur powerfully stated that America will only survive through winning wars and fulfilling our duties. His main priority was to defend the nation, respect the nation, and prosper in that vast nation, otherwise remarked as three key terms: duty, honor, and country. Through the use of rhetorical devices, MacArthur expresses the theme that Americans should defend the country sturdily and carry on its numerous objectives by means of his moral code: “Duty, Honor, Country”.
It is my distinct honor to recommend Sergeant Major George C. Peek for the Order of Military Medical Merit. His demonstrated leadership, daily contributions to develop future leaders, and overall impact to the Army and the AMEDD throughout his military career clearly warrant his selection for this award. His contributions throughout his outstanding career include continuous leadership positions culminating in his current assignment as Chief Medical NCO, Division Surgeon Section, 1st Calvary Division.
World War II was a critical period for America, not to mention the world as well. Throughout all the fighting and bloodshed, Americans returned home successful. Over 700,000 soldiers were disabled after the war, thankful for their lives. All the success and happiness of this country wouldn’t have been possible if not for the bravery, courage, and strategies of our U.S. Generals. They provided the smarts, the morale, and motivation for our soldiers, navy, and airforce to come out victorious and recognized as the best in world history. The five major generals (George Marshall, Dwight Eisenhower, George Patton, Omar Bradley, and Douglas MacArthur) shall never be forgotten as the best generals America has ever had.
„h My survival, honour and safe return home was all but a fading light at the end of the tunnel. It was clear that they wanted me to fight the Boer, but also to be used as a bloody scapegoat for the bloody empire, I lieutenant Morant, leader of the special group, the Bushveldt Carbineers. I guess that us Australians fighting for the Empire was not a privilege, but a bloody scam, a set up, we were fooled.
others for the violence of the war, and summarizes his view on revenge perfectly: “I joined the
John MacArthur is a well-known and sometimes controversial pastor that holds a strong conservative viewpoint of the Scriptures. As a graduate of Talbot Theological Seminary, MacArthur’s ministry has covered a wide spectrum of Christian fields including pastor, author and radio host. MacArthur currently serves as the Pastor of Grace Community Church in Sunny Valley, California. For over 45 years his pastoral ministry at Grace Community Church has given evidence of a deep abiding love for the exposition of the Scriptures. Beyond his role as pastor, MacArthur serves as the president of the Master’s College and Seminary, which functions to train men to work in various areas of Christian ministry. As a successful author, MacArthur continues to write many books ranging from culturally and theological relevant issues to New Testament expositional commentaries and study guides. Macarthur also serves as the lead teacher of Grace to You, an everyday radio and television ministry, which centers on verse by verse exposition of Scripture. MacArthur is not known for shying away from controversial topics that Christianity struggles with. He seeks to use scripture to help modern Christians think through these topics.
The year was 1967 when Charles Haug returned home from Da Nang, Vietnam. Charles is a veteran of the Vietnam War. In Vietnam, Charles Haug was a mechanic who worked on different types of heavy equipment; such as forklifts, cranes, and military vehicles. While in combat, he was moved from Khe Sanh, Vietnam to Da Nang, which was his home base in Vietnam. At that moment he was moved between those two locations, Charles had confidence that he was going to make it back home to Indiana after being away for nineteen months. During those nineteen months, he experienced more things that someone else could learn in a lifetime living in peace.
quickly as possible, and he accomplished his goal by ridding the land of all the
of ground gained by the end of the battle. Haig lost 20,000 men in one
Henry Kissinger who was United States Secretary of State sent a message to Sadat’s by way off his emissary Ismail in which Kissinger offered having Israel withdraw their troops from Sinai, this returning all of Sinai to Egyptian control, minus a few strategic points. No reply to Kissinger’s offer was ever given because Sadat was unwavering in his desire to go to war. The only thing that may have prevented this would have been the United States being able to fulfill all of the demands of the Arab nations in a short period of time.