Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Art museum summary
Art museum summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Art museum summary
The Haggerty Art Museum features an oil painting called Stizende mit Blumen, meaning “Seated Woman with Flowers” by Martel Schwichtenberg. This painting captures the peaceful elements and the complexity of nature. Schwichtenberg shares the importance of nature to those who admire it, but those who do not live in the moment when viewing the painting can overlook the meaning.
When the painting is viewed too fast and not studied at all, the lady looks stressed, sad and angry. But after a closer evaluation, one will began to understand that her face expresses the opposite feelings; she has a relaxed gaze, pleased look, and a calming appearance. In her surroundings, the colorful flowers, green grass, and green bushes enhance the woman’s calming presence. Without careful observation, one will walk on by and not notice the meaning and important details of the painting. The painting as a whole is subtle, but with a bold meaning. When I first looked at the painting, I went straight to the next art piece, but then my professor began to talk about the painting and I began to refocus and study her face and her surroundings. I was quickly reminded of the elements of nature that I love. After the initial glance, Schwichtenberg captures the audience’s attention and reminds them to be in the present moment
…show more content…
In this painting, the most used colors are the shades of green and blue, which are the two main colors that cover the Earth. Also, the bright colors of the flowers that are painted right beside her also enhance the peaceful setting where the woman sits. I believe Schwichtenberg chose to use oil paints because the colors have the same appearance for a longer period of time compared to the other styles of painting. Using oil paints for this painting allows the finished product to be vibrant and appreciated for many
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
Many of these artists' works contain subtle hints to the author's opinion on the subject. By analyzing their central compositional effects, the viewer can obtain a greater appreciation and understanding for the art.
I chose to analyze the The Family, 1941 portray and The Family, 1975 portray, both from Romare Bearden, for this essay because they are very similar paintings but at the same time very different. To write a critical analyzes it was necessary to choose two different paintings that had similar characteristics. The text about critical comparison said that to compare things they have to be similar, yet different, and that’s what these paintings look to me. As I had already written an analysis of The Family, 1941 portray I chose to analyze and compare The Family, 1975 this time. Both works have a lot of color in it and through the people’s faces in the pictures we can feel the different emotions that the paintings are conveying.
The Interpretation/Meaning (III) will be written without any guideline points, the aim of this part will be to determine what the painter wanted to express with his piece of work and what it tells us in a symbolic or not instantly clear way. This part will also handle why the artist drew the painting the way he did it and why he chose various techniques or tools.
As the German painter and sculptor, Kathe Kollwitz conveyed in her statement that the art she created held the burden of transfiguration. The fixation of sorrow and hardship that occurred while she sat huddled with the children was the driving force of her drawings. Her realization that art could not only be an escape from the horror happenings in Germany such as the rationing of food and the starving-to-death children at that time was also a way to voice her opinion of change and revolution. It was the quest, in which she enamored in her drawings and it is this feeling that I value from it. I choose this artist because she delineated the various circumstances surrounding the human individual, she took into account perspectives that involved life with its tragedies, and the lives of little angel children. Her drawings and sculptures were prepared to emulate and capture what her eyes had seen while she was in Germany and this is why I had taken a likening to her drawings. The two artworks that I am specifying in this research paper is the drawing labeled “Germany's children starve!” and”Self-Portrait, Hand at the Forehead (Selbstbildnis mit der Hand an der Stirn)”.
The importance of this famous painting cannot be understated, as seen from the discourse above. It was the headlight that beamed the way for a new form of art expression whose presence can still be felt in the present, albeit having taken a new, more advanced form. It made a case for the importance of attention to detail when producing any form of art. It can also be credited for having roused debate at a time when impressionism was stagnating and required a new inspiration; which was duly accorded by Seurat in his famous piece. In its philosophy is underlined the eternal inspiration that nature accords to creative minds, especially through the power of sight.
The professor himself may be the most brilliant and captivating aspect of the painting. His gaze is piercing and the details of his features are very pronounced and picturesque. Upon looking at his face, one can see that his intellect is unquestionable, for his brow bends in a very discerning manner. The curls of his hair have the perfect amount of detail and his suit the perfect mount of folds. He is arguably the centerpiece of the painting with his respectable stature which conveys control and wisdom (with perhaps a hint of well-deserved
Capturing the natural play of light and shadow was a signature theme in all of Monet’s work. In this painting, he positions the light to the right of the woman and boy which leads the viewer’s eye up. He then uses shadows in the parasol, the woman’s face and on the ground to lead the viewer’s eye back down the painting. The deliberate placement of the light and shade is an effective tool that he uses with a lighter touch in the boys clothing, the clouds and notably the grass. This piece showcases Monet’s use of color, which was another one of his signature themes. He uses cool colors to give the painting a tranquil feeling and to help emphasize his subjects, the woman and boy. He stays with the cool color pallet with use of blue in; the sky, the woman’s clothes, the grass and the boy’s clothes. He then incorporates warm colors into the piece with the use of white in the clouds, and in the models’ clothes, the parasol, and even in the grass. Monet used the highlights of yellow and white to serve as focal points as well as natural highlights...
Form plays a predominant role in these paintings, especially as far as value and shape are concerned. For example, the eyes of the subject in the “What surrounds us we endure…” painting are piercing and ice-cold, conveying desperation and a need to be heard. The eyes look piercing and distressed due to their light blue color which contrasts with the darks shadows enclosing them. Through their body language and facial expressions, the three men in the picture express anxiety, stress and depression which are perhaps due to the rain-streaked night sky, the lonely sidewalk and bus stop and the use of dark, cool hues which surround them. Also, the value of the man in the foreground is very intense because he is lighter than the background and creates an eerie sensation. It is also a focal point in the piece because of the drastic contrast between light and dark fashioned by the strong use of shadow. The remaining two men that occupy the background of the picture seem to be completely exposed to light, almost representing a sense of being scrutinized, but not understood due to the cry ...
The three different colored sashes in the dancer’s dresses and the staff shaped object on the far left of the painting provide some variety to the composition. There is a heavy contrast where the three main dark points on the wall behind the figures are and on the form in the bottom left corner on which one of the figures is
There is a degree of simplicity in the painting, particularly in the way that Velasquez simply made use of space to surround the subject. If it weren’t for the manner in which Velasquez varied the tones of the background through his use of light, the subject would have appeare...
1. Pick any painting and analyze it from the points of view of the (a) formalist, (b) the expressionist, (c) and the philosopher of “aesthetic experience”. Which perspective, if any, do you find most convincing?
Munch popularity is due to his extraordinary ability to convey a deep and raw emotion from the unconscious onto the canvas leaving it to the viewers to interpret, feel and reflect. He stood out from other artists of his time, as he varied away from the norms and focused on the feelings and state of the work, rather than details and perfection. Anxiety evolved as the main point of Munch art. This essay goes through Edvard Munch’s childhood focusing on the events that caused him anxiety, how the anxiety affected his relationship with women and love, and how his idea of anxiety was supported by the theories of Søren Kierkegaard. These elements act as a support of an analysis of three of his works ‘Evening on Karl Johan’, ‘Melancholy’ and ‘The woman in three stages’. This essay should be seen as a work within the subject Visual Arts as it analyses three works of Munch focusing on anxiety. The analysis will contain an analysis of the form, content and context of each of the works. Having experienced the Edvard Munch: Angst/Anxiety exhibition at AROS Museum of Art in Aarhus, Denmark, I found and developed curiosity and inspiration to this essay. I find it worthy of a study as Munch changed the view and concept of art, and provided the public with a concept of art that was not the norm around the 19th centu...
The painting usually drawing people look directly with the viewer but on Third Class Carriage, everyone has the empty looking, nobody looks at another and it doesn’t have any conversation on that train. Only looking at these gesture, these clothes, these eyes, these faces can tell a lot of things on that train. The different between lower class and high class, lower class with workaday concerns frozen in their face, express by their eyes. A painting is invested with an air of sadness. The color and light create a little lonely, empty atmosphere. By the way, the dull atmosphere goes with the undefined eyes of an old guys. It brings the indescribable
Throughout the painting, the use of many elements and principles is shown with the themes of emotion. Simple aspects of colour, tone and texture all collectively work together to formulate a sense of feeling in what is shown. The colours may be neutral in tone, but they assist in expressing the emotions of the piece as a whole. Texture is also another element that demonstrates this in collaboration with the tone to create a realistic yet surrealistic aspect to the painting. The figure’s nude torso is an example of this. The exposure that is exhibited not only emits an impression of shame, it carves out a feeling of vulnerability that is aimed at the audience. Kahlo may not be shamed for the the nudity in the piece, but it is able to frame a solid aspect that the susceptible to shame the position of the figure in the painted depicts a loss that Kahlo is experiencing. The tears on her face also carries this meaning. Her lack of smile indicates that this is sadness or disappointment being shown in the piece. The solemn landscape that is seen in the background also portrays a sense of emotion. The form of the cracks in the ground lead to the possibility that Kahlo is feeling broken and deserted. Her personal issues with her husband or other emotions related to her affairs with others also could be determined by the emotion depicted. The balance demonstrated by the position of the main figure is