Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Celebrities right to privacy
Privacy rights for celebrities
Hipaa violations essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Celebrities right to privacy
After looking over articles concerning HIPAA violations I went with the first article I looked over because it was so extreme to read! My first thought as I was reading was “ oh my, oh my this didn’t even happen on accident.” The article I chose to write on is called, “Californian Sentenced to Prison for HIPAA Violation”. April 29, 2010. The first sentence of this article is what drew me in. A former UCLA health system employee named Huping Zhou became the first person in our nation to go under imprisonment for violating HIPAA. Before being employed as a medical researcher at UCLA, Zhou was a licensed cardiothoracic surgeon in China. While employed as a medical researcher, Zhou took it upon himself to illegally view and read up on his coworkers and other high profile celebrities medical records. After receiving a notice that UCLA was going to dismiss him because of low job performance in illegal access. While on trial he admits to accessing UCLA records 323 times during a 3 week period. Lets just sate this as well, he wasn’t employed at the time either. He admits that he had no legitimate reason to after he was terminated from his job. …show more content…
Medical records are personal information that no one but you and your provider should need to discuss. Zhou could have changed these celebrity’s lives tremendously. This is the kind of information paparazzi strive to gain access to. If Zhou would have sold any of this information it could have ended these celebrities careers or dragged them into a downfall. Thankfully Zhou did lose his job in this case with how extreme the measures were. Not only did he lose his job he got 4 months in prison while also having to pay a fine of
Learning from what Dr. Anna Pou had to face with the lawsuits she was dealing with makes me cringe. As Healthcare professionals, having to worry of possibly being sued for believing what is right for the patient or as a whole for the hospitals health is ridiculous. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Often time’s society look at courts cases as a battle versus two oppositions, but Dr. Pou’s case it is not. In her statements from national television she states saying her role was to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’.
Sobel, R. (2007). The HIPAA Paradox. The Privacy Rule that’s Not. Hasting Center Report, 37(4), 40-50.
The flip side of the signing a confidentiality document under HIPAA policy healthcare officials many times has been frustrated because bounds they can’t cross. Many times family or friends who aren’t authorizes obtains valuable medical information are coming all hours of the day to ask for critical medical reason, the nurses, physicians and others officials bid my law not to get out information on the telephone, or in personal if the individual or individuals name aren’t on the privacy document. Having a ...
According to the report provided by the consultant, the employees at this facility were not taking precautions in safeguarding the patient’s health information. Therefore, the employees at this facility were in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). It is important for employees to understand the form of technology being used and the precautions they must take to safeguard patient information.
Introduction The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, is a law designed “to improve portability and continuity of health insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration of health insurance, and for other purposes. ”1 HIPAA mandates that covered entities must employ technological means to ensure the privacy of sensitive information. This white paper intends to study the requirements put forth by HIPAA by examining what is technically necessary for them to be implemented, the technological feasibility of this, and what commercial, off-the-shelf systems are currently available to implement these requirements. HIPAA Overview On July 21, 1996, Bill Clinton signed HIPAA into law.
. HIPAA privacy rules are complicated and extensive, and set forth guidelines to be followed by health care providers and other covered entities such as insurance carriers and by consumers. HIPAA is very specific in its requirements regarding the release of information, but is not as specific when it comes to the manner in which training and policies are developed and delivered within the health care industry. This paper will discuss how HIPAA affects a patient's access to their medical records, how and under what circumstances personal health information can be released to other entities for purposes not related to health care, the requirements regarding written privacy policies for covered entities, the training requirements for medical office employees and the consequences for not following the policy.
Identity theft has always been in the back of my mind whenever I use my debit card but I wasn’t too concerned about my health information until I learned about HIPAA. It is a very important set of rules and standards that protects our privacy.
US Congress created the HIPAA bill in 1996 because of public concern about how their private information was being used. It is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which Congress created to protect confidentiality, privacy and security of patient information. It was also for health care documents to be passed electronically. HIPAA is a privacy rule, which gives patients control over their health information. Patients have to give permission any health care provider can disclose any information placed in the individual’s medical records. It helps limit protected health information (PHI) to minimize the chance of inappropriate disclosure. It establishes national-level standards that healthcare providers must comply with and strictly investigates compliance related issues while holding violators to civil or criminal penalties if they violate the privacy of a person’s PHI. HIPAA also has boundaries for using and disclosing health records by covered entities; a healthcare provider, health plan, and health care clearinghouse. It also supports the cause of disclosing PHI without a person’s consent for individual healthcare needs, public benefit and national interests. The portability part of HIPAA guarantees patient’s health insurance to employees after losing a job, making sure health insurance providers can’t discriminate against people because of health status or pre-existing condition, and keeps their files safe while being sent electronically. The Privacy Rule protects individual’s health information and requires medical providers to get consent for the release of any medical information and explain how private health records are protected. It also allows patients to receive their medical records from any...
...proactive. With the way that HIPAA was drafted, then add the possible penalties for violators, lead physicians and medical facilities to withold information from individuals who have a right to it. After reviewing the rules of the HIPAA, the legislation found health care providers were unsure of their legal privacy responsibilities and often responded with an overly guarded approach to disclosing information. To date these rules are still confusing and need to made clearer.
Some of the things that HIPAA does for a patient are it gives patients more control over their health information. It sets boundaries on the use and release of health records. It establishes appropriate guidelines that health care providers and others must do to protect the privacy of the patients’ health information. It holds violators accountable, in court that can be imposed if they violate patients’ privacy rights by HIPAA. Overall HIPAA makes it to where the health information can’t b...
Both the Hippocratic Oath and Principles of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association focuses on giving full benefit to the patient. However, there are some major differences between the oath and medical ethics of American Medical Association on various subjects such as patient’s rights, duties of physicians towards the benefit of the society etc.
...aching HIPPA policies. In 2003, a man named Huping Zhou was fined $2000, and sentenced to four months in prison for violating HIPPA sending a message violations will not be tolerated (Dimick, 2010).
Being a health services administrator under an oath that I have taken and under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, I may not comment on the current situation. “HIPAA was designed to protect the privacy, confidentiality and security of patient information” (Pozgar, 2016, pg. 245). Allowing for any of this information to come out would just give media a story in which they will most likely slander anyone in sight.
The title of this article is called “Medical Technology and Ethical Issues” which is written by William E. Thompson and Joseph V. Hickey. This article is about a hospital that uses this computer program called RIP. RIP decides whether a patient will live or die based on the data that is entered by a staff member. Throughout the article, critics and medical ethicist are very critical, second-guessing and debating about the whole computer program. Based on this entire article about doctors using a computer program in the emergency room, I would not be comfortable with using this program if it was me because 9 times out of 10 the computer can be wrong and it’s more comforting to trust the knowledge from an actual doctor.
The sixth ethical issue arises when the client is denied access to his medical chart. Currently, HIPPA (2006) grants clients access to their medical records. An exception to this is if the information contained within the medical records is “reasonably likely” to cause harm to the client (HIPPA, 2006; APA, 2002). The records were unlikely to cause harm to the patient and, therefore, the client should have had access to them.