Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control opposing viewpoints
Gun control opposing viewpoints
Argument topics about gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun control opposing viewpoints
In the Upfront debate “ Why We’re Still Arguing About Gun Control?” (2017) Patricia Smith challenges the readers to consider that there is two sides to the argument about gun control after the tragic incidents that have happened but it's all comes down to the second amendment. Smith believes that the debates really hit the center core when it comes to the discussion of the second admented an “individual’s right to bear arms or just the peoples collective right”. Smiths’ purpose is to let people know that there will always have different views when it comes to guns and in order to understand people need to see both sides. Smiths’ targets people who are concerned citizens by letting them know that there is two sides to the problems.
In"Get a Knife, Get a dog, but Get Rid of Gun," Molly Ivins argues on gun control laws and how guns should be banned or restricted to some people. In the essay she argues how knife is more safer than guns to use, because more likely people die from cleaning or using guns in wrong way. Author main purpose is to let people know guns is danger, and should be ban. She also points out the 2nd amendment and it says clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia, that is armed forced, including the National Guard. I agree with Ivins about the guns control, because guns is for special training people only, and private citizens shouldn't have gun, also we don’t need to hunt for food to survive and killing innocent animal just for fun.
United States is a country that has problems with gun control, and this issue has many debates between whether or not people should be allowed to carry a gun on them. This free county not only for speech and religion, but also allows people to have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment of the United States was written by our Founding Fathers,“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Government). The main purpose of the Second Amendment when our Founding Fathers wrote this amendment was to help the American citizens to defend themselves from the government at that time, and other countries from invading their properties. However, the Second Amendment could be the opposite of what our Founding Fathers wanted it to be in the twenty-first century, because many criminals are taking advantage of the right to carry guns, which in example results with the purpose of showing off with their friends, revenge for their gang’s members, or try to be like their favorite hero in the movie they had watched. On July 20, 2012, a massive shooting occurred inside of a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. The tragedy happened during a midnight screening of the film The Dark Knight Rises which killed twelve people and injuring seventy others. In response, this alarmed our government to rethink about the current gun control law in America. In A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell, the author informed to his audience the different views of gun ownership in early America, which part was the most important part of the debate, how did slavery affect the debate over militias in the South, the Continental army officer’s views, and the arguments be...
The United State of America, established by the Founding Father who lead the American Revolution, accomplished many hardship in order to construct what America is today. As history established America’s future, the suffering the United State encountered through history illustrate America’s ability to identify mistakes and make changes to prevent the predictable. The 2nd Amendment was written by the Founding Father who had their rights to bear arms revoked when they believe rising up to their government was appropriate. The Twentieth Century, American’s are divided on the 2nd Amendment rights, “The right to bear arms.” To understand why the Founding Father written this Amendment, investigating the histories and current measures may help the American people gain a better understanding of gun’s rights in today’s America.
New York Times writer Jeff McMahan argues in his 2012 article, “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”, that the United States should ban gun ownership entirely, or almost entirely. (McMahan, 1) McMahan creates his main argument around the idea that when more and more citizens become armed, “criminals work to be better armed and more efficient in their use of guns.” (McMahan, 1) Ultimately, he argues that although some with guns may be safer than if they were without the guns, but the without guns become much more vulnerable. So why not just arm everyone with guns as gun activists would say, then wouldn't everyone be safer? No. As McMahan points out, “When more citizens get guns, further problems arise: people who would have once have got in a fistfight
Public policies are developed in response to the existence of a perceived problem or an opportunity. The analysis delves into a public issue or problem and assesses a set of proposed government action for addressing the issue. The job of the analyst is to describe the background and status of an issue and then, using research and analysis, determine a proper government action to resolve the issue. By comparing options and weighing their expected benefits, the analyst should conclude with a recommended course of action or inaction to addressing the issue.
The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight. Many Americans question the importance and legitimacy of the Second Amendment, claiming that it is outdated and invalid. An increasing number of people feel that the Second Amendment should be fully eradicated from the Constitution, and new restrictions outlining firearm ownership should be implemented. Furthermore, in addition to questioning the validity of the phrase, many people question the literal meaning of the Second Amendment. Through critical analysis of the text itself, including tedious speculation of grammar and punctuation, many ...
As violence and murder rates escalate in America so does the issue of gun control. The consequence of this tragedy births volatile political discourse about gun control and the Second Amendment. The crux of the question is what the founding fathers meant when they wrote, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Since the writing of the Second Amendment the make and model of firearms has changed dramatically and so has the philosophies of the people. A rifle is no longer defined as a single shot, muzzle-loading musket used to primarily protect families or solely for food. Should the weapons we use today be protected by an amendment written nearly 222 years ago? Should the second amendment be rewritten? Does the Second Amendment apply to individual citizens? These questions spark extensive debates in Washington D.C. regarding what the founding fathers intended the amendment to be. The answer to this question lies in the fact that despite hundreds of gun control articles having been written , still the gun control issue remains unresolved. History tells us gun control debates will be in a stalemate until our judicial system defines or rewrites the Second Amend. This paper will examine the history of the Second Amendment, and attempt to define the framers intent, gun control legislation and look at factors that affect Americans on this specific issue...
Although my voting patterns have become somewhat more conservative in recent years, I remain in my heart of hearts a 1960s Humphrey Democrat concerned with the plight of those most vulnerable in American society-minorities, the poor, the elderly, and single women-groups whose day-to-day realities are often overlooked in our public policy debates, people whose lives too often go unnoticed by our intellectually timid chattering classes. This is happening in the public debate over the right to bear arms. For the nation’s elites, the Second Amendment has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights, constantly attacked by editorial writers, police chiefs seeking scapegoats, demagoging politicians, and most recently even by Rosie O’Donnell, no less. It is threatened by opportunistic legislative efforts, even when sponsors acknowledge their proposed legislation would have little impact on crime and violence.
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
This research paper will peer into the scope and nature of gun control behavior that is disproportionate to the situation at hand, and reasons for the onset gun control. To supplement the research, there is also an important need to discuss and consider different regions of the world that have similar or different methods for gun control and whether or not it causes more uproar in their communities. I will also discuss the best way for law enforcement to encounter these types of situations when confronted with subjects as well as the difficulty in recognizing them. Finally, I will conclude with policy suggestions, and a summary of key themes from the research as to how these techniques can help nations maintain a sense of consideration.
For almost a century firearm policy in the United States has been in the spotlight. If legislators would take a good look at the different countries and their gun laws, it would be beneficial for the people of the United States. Vizzard was looking at the federal legislation enacted in 1968 as it appeared to shift away from the lassiez-faire approach to policy on firearms (2015). When looking at the gun control laws in the past twenty years it shows nothing has essentially changed at the national level (Vizzard,2015). There is some history that should be put into account Vizzard looks at, “after the 1993 passage of both the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention and federal assault weapon restrictions, the 1994 Republican congressional victories marked the end of any momentum for additional federal legislation”
To begin with, owning a firearm presents you with two options, use it for protection, fun, and away from innocent civilians, or use it for violence. A class handout titled “The 2nd Amendment,” provides a section of statistics about gun violence. It states that “In 1998, 3,792 American children and teenagers died by gunfire.” Also, from 1998-1999, 3,500 students were expelled for bringing firearms to school. This shows how firearms are used for violence, and makes our Second Amendment look very bad. In the same hand out, a section titled “District of Columbia v. Heller,” provides us with information about how the right to bear arms is a right which we should not lose, do to the fact that it’s in our constitution. When it comes to owning a firearm, we need to be smart about how we use it and what for.
Gun Control has been a rising problem in the United States since the 20th century, it is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control#cite_note-2 Gun control may be legislated at either a federal level or a local state level in some countries such as the United States.
Do you have not only a legal, but a moral right to own a gun? Do you believe that you have either a moral or a legal right to park a car with a loaded gun in a privately owned parking lot, regardless of what the lot’s owner wants?
Who knew shootings would be the top subject on our citizens minds. The two articles, “Issue Overview: Guns in America”, By Bloomberg, ”Famous Speeches: "We call BS," Emma Gonzalez's speech to gun advocates”, By Emma Gonzalez it provides reasons for why we should have the right to own guns and why owning guns is not safe. Gun control is a big topic with all the shootings. Finally, Owning guns has similarities and differences but, in the end banning guns is not going to stop people from using them.