Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family structure affects child development
Social capital theory
Strengths and weaknesses of the family structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family structure affects child development
Apparently, children since a young age do not have the same starting line. Depending on the parents’ or grandparents’ wealth and socioeconomic status (SES), what we experience is highly distinguishable from each other. My interpretation of social world having grown up in a modest middle class family would be different than of kids from a high class family. As a matter of fact, it is difficult to see objectively how my capitals have worked to let me read my own social world this way. It is many times taken for granted, and the privileges are hard to be aware of until you go through the disadvantages or someone else pinpoints it out to you. My father, with parents from a farming background, certainly started from a disadvantaged point compared …show more content…
It is because they have an enough-paid job as a teacher and an official at the office of education now, and the cultural message suggests that their achievement is enough to be considered a successful life. In like manner, possession of primary forms of capital – financial, human, cultural, and social—influences several aspects of life including employment, schooling, and family life. The capital classifies people within hierarchy and further dictates how to understand the social world, which again affects their accumulation of capital.
One of the arenas of life that matters for children’s access to capital is a family life as a certain structure of family is associated with higher accumulation of wealth and capital. To be honest, I took it for granted to have both parents in my life. In fact, I cannot deny that financial capital and cultural capital helped us to maintain the structure of my family. It was wealth and enough income that prevented our family from separating due to financial problems, whether by divorce or for a parent to leave for a better-paying job far from home. Furthermore, it was wealth coming from both parents and grandparents that put me in affluent
…show more content…
Classification of students happens within school based on family status, grades, race, etc. Tracking is the institutional tool that is used to intensify the stratification (Carter, p.72). I also remember I had tracked classes as early as the 7th grade, and the more you attended after school institutions, the higher the chance of being placed in ‘above average’ classes. However, we further need to take into account inter-school stratification. In my experience, I did not quite go through such extreme divisions within the school since students in my elementary and middle school—it was a private school— came from similar backgrounds and levels of wealth. It was not only about physical resources in which we had more than public school students that made many of us outstanding. There were more important factors that were expected by parents and teachers, and those expectations created cultural capital for the students. In my middle school, almost all of us never questioned going to college. With an access to this dominant cultural signal, our entry into high school was greatly guaranteed, especially to those excelling schools. Therefore, with financial capital, cultural capital and social capital all working together, I was accepted to a good high school and could interpret the aspiration for academic
Certainly, being born into a privileged family have their advantages. Unfortunately, for those who are born into poverty may struggle for their success, but it is not impossible. The podcast “Three Miles” is a great example of that. Comparatively, on the surface Melanie and Raquel are two individuals coming from the same unfortunate circumstances. Although, both girls were introduced to the same pen pal program their outcomes would travel different courses. Initially, the purpose of this program is to give students from poor neighborhoods a glimpse inside their wealthier counterpart’s lives, from another school. Raquel and Melanie’s backgrounds were similar, because they were afforded the same opportunities, but they turned out differently. Raquel was driven while Melanie is unambitious.
The education of privileged children was all about preparing boys for their future career. Members of the affluent society always wanted to send their childr...
Besides race, the scholar also reveals how childhoods are unequal based on social class. Drawing from the American society, there are several social classes. For each class, there are unique pathways of lives followed and these usually influence both the educational and work outcomes. To ...
I have to introduce you to three individuals, not random individuals, but siblings - two brothers and a sister. They may seem just like any other people, but they have a secret that isn’t easily realized unless you know them. They belong here in the sense that they were born here, but their hearts belong to another land. They are the children of immigrants; the first generation to be born in America. It is a unique experience that to others may seem odd or exotic, but for these three is just as normal as learning to ride a bike.
“The higher the student’s social status is, the higher the probability is that they will get higher grades” (Mantsios 294). Today the patterns persist as Mr. Mantsios’ article shows “that of the students who took the College Board Exam (SAT) - the students who score lower points were of lower class whereas, the students of high class, scored higher on the tests”(Mantsios 294). Mr. Mantsios “compares a study that was done in 1978 by Richard De Lone for the Carnegie Council on Children, which showed a relationship between class and test scores to a survey done by College Board, thirty years later, to reveal that there is no difference; test scores are still linked to family income” (Mantsios 294). Mr. Mantsios states that class standing and consequently life chances, are largely determined at birth” (Mantsios
In today’s society people are viewed as being in different classes depending on how much money they bring in. The categorization of people is known as classism. Classism is simply the prejudice or in favor of people belonging to a particular social class. Classism is known as one of the largest social problems plaguing the world today. Classes are formed according to how the rules of the following institutions; government regulations and economic status. It is held in place by a system of beliefs and cultural attitudes that ranks people according to their; economic status, family lineage, job status, and level of education. There are three major classifications to which people are titled. They include upper or high class which includes the people with the most money. The middle class who includes the people that brings home the average income. Finally, the class titled the lower class that includes the people who have only one income coming in or none at all (“What Is Classism.”). In the classrooms these classes still remain and the students within each class have different ways in which they learn, and view schooling. We as educators have to look passed their ways and address each class the same.
Class is something that is often defined by ones income, job, and family background, the area in which they live or indeed the schools or universities they have chosen to attended. This criteria is used to label people as a certain class and is something that can be seen in education through the likes of theories such as cultural capital. In this essay I am going to compare and contrast differences between middle and working class experiences of education focusing on two main theories; Cultural capital and social reproduction. I am going to concentrate upon the primary sector in oppose to secondary or higher education due to the fact I believe that primary school is where most children develop their personalities which they carry with them in further life and it is their first academic experience; therefore it is where social class first becomes clearly noticeable. In relation to these theories I am going to research into the argument that parents have a strong influence on their child’s education from this young age.
I mentioned earlier that within my own school, we have a problem with segregation between students that take different classes. While not an official program, my school system does have a practice of tracking students together based on achievement levels. Starting in elementary school students tend to grouped based on their academic ability. Often times you will see students of color and students from low-income families in what are often called the “bottom” classes. The students many times are then stuck in the classes that do not have the same high expectations as the one or two classes of our “top” students. Those “top” classes are often times over represented by the white students as well as students from more affluent families. Going back to Orfield, et al (2010), one way to keep this from happening is by “detracking” students (p 25). Oftentimes students are labeled at a young age and sent on track that will carry on all the way through graduation. Minority students, ELL students and students from low income families generally do not test well at young ages and then are put on track of education that has lower expectations than their peers that are from affluent white families. According to Orfield, et al (2010), schools that use detracking strategies for their students often see increased
from the same class, and the same goes for middle and high socioeconomic status. This period in a child’s life is cr...
Our initial findings demonstrate that a selected number of school leaders consider issues of tracking as an important strategy in reducing achievement gaps in their school. School tracking is the process in which students are assigned to different levels of classes based on academic proficiency (Oakes, 2005). Though research has demonstrated that tracking can have a negative influence for those students placed in lower tracked classes—more often negatively affecting students of color and of low-SES—it remains a prominent practice in schools. In fact, according to Jeannie Oakes (2005) the issue of school tracking is so embedded in the culture of schools “that we seldom question it. We assume that it is best for students. But we don’t very often
School, work, religious, and home lives are likewise connected to the impact of social classes. Economic class is one of the variables in life simply like race and ethnicity that impacts our decisions and conduct as people. Be that as it may, not at all like race partialities, we have some control
There are many different factors that affect education. One such factor is, socioeconomic status. Children who attend school in a wealthier community receive a better education than those students in poor communities. In poor communities, student’s education is not only affected by a lack of resources, but also from teaching methods and philosophies. Urban and poor schools’ students do not receive as equal of an education as their more affluent and suburban counterparts do.
How social class impacts education In all the different social groups, class plays a key role in the attainment or success of children in education. In the educational system it is apparent that lower class children achieve lower attainment than those that come from a middle class background (Tzanakis, 2011: 79-86). It is believed or suggested that the educational system is biased and intended for the middle class children with no regard to the needs of the working class. Nonetheless, most researchers believe or think that the ‘range of ability’ in every social class is similar (Tzanakis, 2011: 79-86).
Sgritta (1994) states that there is extensive evidence which is accessible to explain that children on average and contrasted with other age groups to be part of the lower economic class. Certainly, this could be a contradiction as no one would want children to be somewhat impoverished; but it can be interpreted in terms of two main aspects: one aspect is the expansion of children’s time through society and the other aspect is the emphasis on the family culture. This causes children from lower income families to experience a different kind of childhood as compared to the middle-class or the upper-class children within the society. Another issue of the power of family ideology involves children’s transient
According to Ansalone (2010), “tracking is a defective strategy” (p.14). Opponents of tracking claim lower tracks contain “disproportionate number of Black and Hispanics and that tracking facilitates the separation of social classes” (Ansalone, 2010, p. 6). Research suggests that tracking generally results in the separation of students along racial, ethnic, and socio-economic lines (Ansalone, 2010, p. 11). There is also speculation that high SES students are more often placed in upper tracks.