People always say how they would love to live in a small town. That they love the feeling of unity and being close with everyone in the city. In Our Town, Wilder (the author) infers to the fact that the town endures zero privacy (everyone knows everyone’s business), expectations, and people seem to be going through the motions of life, and he does not intend to idealize Grover’s Corners as an establishment of uncompromising brotherly love. Wilder makes a point to include in the play characters who criticize small town life, and Grover’s Corners specifically. I believe that Our Town is a criticism of small town life because there is no personal privacy and people go through life hoping to live up to everyone else’s expectations, missing life’s moments of happiness.
There is a saying that nothing is faster than small town
…show more content…
gossip. It natural for humans to desire privacy. However, in Our Town, the reader begins to pick up that nothing is private in Grover’s Corner. For example, we read about Simon Stimson, the choir director and town drunk. We read that after choir practice, Mrs. Gibbs and Mrs. Soames (two main characters), are badmouthing Stimpson (who we read in act three eventually hung himself). We chuckle at the middle-aged ladies’ gossiping. However, there is another element to it. Everyone knows that Stimpson is the town drunk. Everyone talks about him, and awaits his dismissal as choir director. The town is essentially a “glass house”. There are no secrets. Gossip travels around schools. We see this today, also, across the nation. The government has drones and satellites all over. There isn’t anywhere to hide from them. They are said to be used as protection, but I believe it is a violation of our Fourth Amendment (prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause). If I have a party, or am going on a road trip, a government drone isn’t receiving an invite. Privacy will always be a highly debated issue, but to me there is a fine line necessary surveillance and an invasion of privacy. The big reason that I believe that Grover’s Corners is due to the fact that the community has expectations for people and people seem to go through the motions of life.
In Grover’s Corners, there are three life events: Birth, Marriage, Death. The rest is a blur. In Our Town, the stage manager says, People are meant to go through life two by two. ’Tain’t natural to be lonesome.” They expect marriage. Without going through it, you are looked down upon. Also, there is a sense that people are trapped in Grover’s Corners. People are anticipated to carry on the family business on the farm, shop, etc. Likewise, people don’t go through life with meaning. They don’t treasure the little moments of joy in life. This idea of trying to do what we are “supposed to” still occurs today. We still have standards we are set to achieve: making good grades, going to college, marriage, retirement, etc. All good things, but you are judged based on your achievement of these “goals”. Even today, people have expectations for kids based on their parents’ achievements, career, etc. Expectations can decide how your life goes and how happy you
are. We can learn from this by appreciating the little things in life. In Act three, during the grave scene, the dead try to explain the living don’t understand. They don’t comprehend that life is short, and little things happen every day that are worth cherishing. Actually, after Emily Webb realizes that she can go back, she says, ''I'll choose a happy day, anyway.'' Her mother-in-law, Mrs. Gibbs, replies: ''No! At least, choose an unimportant day. Choose the least important day in your life. It will be important enough.'' Saying, ''I can choose a birthday at least, can't I?,'' Emily chooses her 12th birthday. This day becomes too much for her to handle. She realizes the importance of an ordinary day.“ This is the way we were: in our growing up and in our marrying and in our living and in our dying.” Do we really appreciate our lives? Or do we simply go through the motions and try to live up to expectations?
Susan Wolf, born in 1952, is widely considered one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th and 21st century. One of Wolf’s most renowned works is The meanings of Lives, which drew a lot of attention in the philosophical world for a number of questions that arose from it. Arguably her most widely debated and questioned assertion in The meanings of Lives is “If you care about yourself you’re living as if you’re the center of the universe, which is false.” This however I don’t not believe to be true. Every human being, no matter how successful or unsuccessful, has the right to care for them sleeves and not believe they are the center of the universe while doing so.
The search for our definition of the good life is wrought with trials and tribulation, working to overcome deep seeded trends of oppression within society or family. For some, finding the good life requires them to rise above subjugation, regardless of consequences. This struggle is illustrated in Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr, who argues the necessity of peaceful protest to find a future of equality free from persecution, and in Hobson’s Choice by Harold Brighouse where a woman must rise above her father’s tyrannical will to find a good life. While no struggle is without its consequences, the finality of finding the good life and the benefits of that achievement ultimately overrides the fight for happiness.
All in all, Chris McCandless is a contradictory idealist. He was motivated by his charity but so cruel to his parents and friends. He redefined the implication of life, but ended his life in a lonely bus because of starvation, which he was always fighting against. Nevertheless, Chris and the readers all understand that “happiness only real when shared.” (129; chap.18) Maybe it’s paramount to the people who are now alive.
Everyone wants to fill the void within themselves, and most humans try to accomplish this by finding jobs they enjoy, but it seems that most of them ultimately fail. When you are younger you look to your parents to show you the way, but as you approach adulthood you start to feel more of a sense of rebellion toward them instead of the admiration you once had. The writer makes the poem universal by saying he didn’t want to end up like his father, something most children in north america could relate to. It’s also easily linked to our society in north america because of the way our schooling system is set up, in a way that you must commit to what you’re going to do for the rest of your life when you’re still too young to vote, and our system being this way makes it easy to end up regretting what you choose. Humans in modern society are expected to make many commitments for a range of things- relationships or sports teams, even major life decisions, and it’s obvious that our natural need for commitment is prevalent in our everyday life. Consequently, this need for making commitments can end up leaving people making poor decisions or at least taking a route you’ll end up wanting to renounce in the
The novel is set during the Great Depression, which was “a time of great economic turmoil and disaster” (American History), in Soledad, California. Before the characters are fully introduced, there is a sense of isolation already because the name of the town literally translates to loneliness in Spanish (Study Spanish). Most of the characters experience loneliness. The reader quickly learns that Lennie is a lonely character when George reminds Lennie: "guys like us, that work on ranches, are the loneliest guys in the world. They got no family. They don't belong no place" (Steinbeck 15). As the novel continues, the reader quickly learns that the workers are not the only ones who are lonely; Crooks, Candy and Curley's wife also confess their loneliness. Candy experiences loneliness due to his disability and his age. Candy lost his hand after an accident involving machinery, which ultimately forces him to stay behind. His age also causes Candy to feel a sense of loneliness because he is...
...ts set for them. Children are constantly aware of adults’ choices, and they begin to formulate their own understanding of general values at a young age. When adults are hypocritical of their pre-set standards, it sends children into a state of discombobulation. Staying true to one’s values as an example for children will be beneficial to them as they travel along the highway of childhood and come upon the exit necessary to reach the interstate of adulthood.
... what we're supposed to get out of this life..." one realizes that she has put her ambitions and desires above her family and paid no heed to her familial responsibility.
My introduction : Throughout the novel, many are lonely. Of the characters, Curley's wife, Crooks and Candy all show signs of desperate loneliness, though they respond quite differently. Each is isolated because of special mistreatment. Because Crooks is black, he is shunned and separated from the other men. He spends most of his time in his room, alone and bitter. Curley's wife also spends her days hounded by her mean, spirited husband; her attempts to reach out to the other men backfire and win the the undeserved reputation of a flirt. Candy has a disadvantage being handicap, and he has an unconditional love for an old and feeble and after his dog is shot he looks for new companionship. Throughout the characters of Curley's wife, Crooks and Candy, Steinbeck proves that one can be lonely, even if he's constantly surrounded by people.
In this society, citizens are bred in a factory to be whatever the society needs them to be. ( Huxley 13). This is significant in everyone who has a destiny they cannot escape, a purpose they did not choose to be their own. Without this freedom, nobody can really be truly happy and free. However this society does ensure happiness but in a different way, which is called “ conditioning”. Conditioning in this society is when the people in the world state predestined them to love their job, which is the reason why they were born and to dislike other jobs and purposes that they may have wanted to pursue without conditioning. In this novel, they were doing conditioning on 8 month old babies who were in the delta caste. Some nurses presented books and flowers to them, when they began to crawl towards the books and flowers, the babies received a mild shock which scared them and left them terrified, after so many times completing this process; the children will have instinctive hatred towards books and flowers. Mr.Foster describes how “ all conditioning aims at that; making people like their unescapable social destiny” (16). This portrays that conditioning cannot be escaped, even if they tried. The conditioned are force to enjoy what they were conditioned to enjoy without freedom of choice whether or not they want to, this is just creating false
The stories suggest we shouldn’t be spending so much time trying to get to the “Happy Ending”, and we should be more concerned about what’s going on in the middle. The majority of us are that typical person living the typical life, and perhaps Atwood is suggesting that we strive for more.
...ferent from their peers has isolated Bernard, Helmholtz, and John, it has also deepened their individuality. This scenario, at a lesser level, often plays out in modern day. People possess a natural desire to fit in and often are willing to forego individuality in order to do so. Though one may gain a facade of happiness as a result of fitting in, being truthful to oneself and expressing one’s free will allows for honest expression of individuality, a concept much greater than such a facade. A society without unique individuals is a society without humanity, and, as demonstrated through these characters’ experience, does not function. Ultimately, people must realize that individuality, knowledge, and raw emotion is more important to society than superficial happiness.
Having a family of low socioeconomic status inevitably leaves me to reside in a low-income neighborhood which makes it more likely for me to witness the tragedies, adversities and hardships that people go through [not excluding myself]. Being conscious of this kind of environment, and these kinds of events, creates a pressure on me for having the aim to achieve social mobility in order to escape the aforementioned environment so that my own children could witness one less abominable aspect of life. Moreover, my family’s low socioeconomic status does not authorize me the privilege of being raised with the concerted cultivation method that kids of high socioeconomic status are more prone to being raised in. My family did not have the financial resources that granted us access to extra classes or lessons of instrumental classes, swimming practices, karate practices, or any other extracurricular activities that people of high socioeconomic status would be able to afford. This invisible fence that prevents me from these extracurricular activities enables me to having more appreciation towards the hobbies and talents that other people have. Plus, the fact that my family’s low socioeconomic status acts as a barrier from enjoying expensive luxuries in life creates a yearning [in me] to enjoy them later on in my life, in addition to acting as the fuel to my wish of achieving social mobility in anticipation of providing my own children with the luxurious vacations, gadgets, beachhouse, new cars that I could not
In result, Bebe’s mother told her she was disappointed in her, then sent her to her room, leaving her alone with her own consciousness, and leaving her alone to think about what she had done. On her way to her room she stopped to watch her neighbor, who was beating his son for something that was seemingly less important than what Bebe had done herself. She recalls a time when all the kids, the neighbors, her siblings, and herself, had all gotten in trouble together and the neighbors had said he was going to beat them all (128). Even though the neighbors boys were beaten and spanked they continued to get into trouble and do the things that caused them punishment, knowing they would get into trouble for it. Yet, even before Bebe's mother told her she was disappointed in her, she felt guilt and remorse, due to the way her mother had raised her, instilling values in her that saying and doing certain things wasn’t acceptable. This is one of the main examples of how there is no specific set of values, and that each family gets to choose their own values and how they instil them in their family.
In Margaret Atwood’s short story, “Happy Endings,” the central theme of fiction provides several different kinds of marriages and relationships that ultimately result in the same ending. The “Happy Endings” shows that it’s difficult to have complete control over day-to-day events. No matter how hard society tries to achieve the perfect life, it does not always go as planned. It doesn’t matter if the characters are bored and depressed, confused and guilty, or virtuous and lucky; the gradual path of version A is not always in reach.
Growing up, I was given the freedom to choose who I wanted to be, to decide what I wanted to do. I grew up with many different opportunities and chances to try out new things. A simple life I led as a child, sheltered and loved by all, but I was oblivious to reality, lost in my own “perfect” world. Yet as I grew up and began to surpass the age of imaginary worlds, the idea of “perfection” had begun to fade and reality began to settle in. Like a splash of cold water, I went from a childish mindset to an adult’s. Child hood play was a thing of the past and responsibility became the norm.