Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Identify The Major Influence Of Mate Selection
Merits and Disadvantages of Sexual and Asexual Reproduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Identify The Major Influence Of Mate Selection
Sexual Reproduction: although seemingly harmless, presents an evolutionary problem and it has for many years. It is one of the most confusing natural occurrences. Graham Bell referred to sexual reproduction as: “ the queen of problems in evolutionary biology.” There are numerous costs of sex, for example: sexual reproduction takes an immense amount of time and energy. Also only females can produce offspring leaving males slightly useless in the eyes of some, having only to contribute their sperm.
The group selection hypothesis says that group selection is a process in which an individual does things and makes changes that are for the benefit of the species as a whole. Prediction 1 would say that group selection should favor females because
…show more content…
A fact from lecture is that selection favors the parent who produces offspring of less numerous sexes, meaning that there are more males in the world than females. This goes against prediction 1 from GS because according to the hypothesis there should be fewer males but in actuality there are more males because more males means that females will have a greater orotundity for reproducing. Fact 2 helps to point out flaws with the prediction from VP because the prediction would support the success mainly in sexually reproducing species when in fact asexual species also have high success rates. Fact 4 and 5 also help to falsify the prediction from VP because these facts don’t show a vast difference in the reproduction types that are being used. Fact 3 coincides well with what prediction 1 and prediction 2 of the tangled bank hypothesis predicts. Oysters and elms have a high number of mates and disperse their offspring to potentially have a greater success at survival. Both oysters and elms reproduce sexually and often as prediction 1 would suggest. Fact 6 also goes along with prediction 1 asexual species produce in more low population density areas than sexually reproducing species do because there is not as great of a need to compete to survive. Fact 7 coincides well with prediction 1 for PR hypothesis. Brightly colored …show more content…
A popular example of altruism being bees, they don’t reproduce but instead work for the Queen who does the reproducing. The variable progeny theory is important to sexual reproduction understanding because it helps to recognize the range in potential variation in a population. The tangled bell hypothesis creates an understanding for why there is a sexual drive within species, potentially because breeding more helps the species as whole survive. In conclusion the pathogen resistance hypothesis helps explain why species are attracted to whom they are attracted to. Individuals want the best to sexually reproduce with they look for someone they think they will have the best success with and they decide who is based on things that can be seen. The evolution of sex is important to understanding mating choices and mating strategies because it explains not only what individuals look for in a specific partner but also why. Possibly because they think they are healthy in terms of the pathogen resistance theory or why a certain species has so many offspring like turtles for example. Turtles produce large amounts of offspring maybe because they know there is competition to survive and producing a greater amount of offspring heightens the chance
The chapter on fecundity addresses the bizarre ways that nature has evolved to ensure the continuity of a species. As the title suggests, fecundity deals with the fertility of species where Annie Dillard explores the inefficiency of fertility and the brutality of nature’s evolution. In the end, Dillard concludes that death is a part of life.
Darwin's General Summary and Conclusions of the Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex In the "General Summary and Conclusions" of The Descent of Man, and
Darwin states that this struggle need not be competitive in nature and also entails a species’ efficiency at producing offspring. Natural selection works not as an active entity that seeks and exterminates species that are not suited for their environment; instead, it retains variations that heighten a species’ ability to dominate in the struggle for existence and discards those that are detrimental or useless to that species. Stephen J. Gould explains the case of r-selection in which a species’ chances of survival are most reliant on its ability to reproduce rapidly and not on its structure being ideally suited for its environment. Gould’s example shows the beneficial results of perceiving natural selection not as something that changes a species in accordance with its environment but as something that preserves characteristics beneficial in the s... ...
This leads to sexual dimorphism and the evolution of physical sex differences. If the male organisms have to compete by combat they evolve to become as physically superior as possible, so the males develop in size and that can lead to males being a lot larger than the females. For example the male elephant seals have to fight for the females and therefore the female elephant seal is much smaller than the male. The individuals also compete using displays, the male individual would be ornamented and the female would be dull looking. For example, a peacock’s tail or the ritual of attracting mates of the male paradise
This "selfish gene", possessing a certain selfish emotional nature, acts as an independent entity fighting to ensure its replication in future generations, maximizing its number of descendents (2). Those successful in replicating have made the most of their given environment (1). For the interests of this paper, is it valid to assume that natural selection occurs at the level of DNA? Hence, what can be implied about genetic predispositions?
In order to understand the present lifestyles relating to different approaches and tactics applied by humans in mate choice preferences, there is the need to refer to Darwin (1859, 1871) evolutionary perspectives. Darwin (1871) sexual selection is the driving force for males and females reproductive quest for their genes survival. These driving forces have been classified into two categories as intra-sexual and intersexual mate selection.Intersexual selection is male sexual selection process whereby males compete with other males and the females choose the strongest as their ideal partner. Intra-sexual selection occurs when the male species fight among themselves and the strongest gain access to females for
Evolutionary Psychology has been controversial since its rise in the 1990s, with critics and proponents debating its merits as a science. While critics (e.g. David Buller, Elizabeth Lloyd) have extensively criticized the fundamentals of Evolutionary Psychology, few philosophers or scientists have challenged them. Given the growing influence of the evolutionary behavioral sciences within mainstream science like Psychology and Anthropology, it is important analyze the critiques and see if the arguments against Evolutionary Psychology have merit. This paper will focus on two of the most often cited critiques of Evolutionary Psychology: the critique of the concept of the modular model of the mind and the critique of the two “signature achievements” in Evolutionary Psychology, Martin Daly and Margot Wilson’s Cinderella Effect and David Buss’s studies of male-female differences in jealousy. I will describe and respond these critiques of Evolutionary Psychology, making the case that these critiques are not valid and have little merit on scientific basis of Evolutionary Psychology.
Despite the sound logic of the evolutionary argument, it does not account for what humans have had for a long time: contraception. This is why many people prefer to look at how this double standard formed from more of a sociological viewpoint. Women’s sexual con...
When invoking the individual or the group as the unit of selection for evolution, altruistic behaviour cannot be sufficiently explained. Instances of altruism can, however, be understood when one considers that the genes which endure are the ones whose evolutionary consequences service their own interests—that is, continuing to be replicated— rather than those of the organism. Though the interests of the individual organism and their genes generally tend to be in alignment, in cases where an animal is seen to be behaving altruistically, they are in fact acting in favour of the preservation of their genes rather than their individual existence. The concept of the selfish gene usefully expresses this notion—while the gene is being selfish, it leads to unselfish acts.
It comes as no surprise that our bodies are made to reproduce and that the urge to procreate is a fundamental part of life. Reproduction is what allows us to create generation after generation. It is incredible to think we all start as one single vulnerable cell and then we all blossom into one hundred trillion cells with no person being completely identical to another. It seems nearly impossible to have that many variations. With that
The whole point of sleeping with someone is to have children. So wouldn’t diversifying how much you spread your genes be a good tactic to ensure survival? That’s where monogamy really come into play. There are two types of monogamy we talked about: social and sexual. Social referring to a partnership, while sexual refers to sex partner. The notion of social partnerships being monogamist has been reinforced for multiple generations and with help from social analytics, is feasibly plausible. Research has backed this phenomenon, but sexual monogamy is a different story. Sexual monogamy, or having one sex partner, is an act that defies our natural chemistry to procreate as much as possible. But this contradicts the principle of social monogamy, because we think the two go hand in hand. The reality is the two terms are fundamentally different and therefore, they have a hard time relating. Emotional dependency is a foundation for the modern relationship, while more and more, we stray from sex as a basic principle. That’s the problem: we are sexual creatures and require sexual elements in a relationship. Now this is not to say base it all off sex, but honor the fact that our bodies use sex as a physical connection to another person. To truly live out the biological demise we put ourselves in, we must learn about the components of a relationship and then work with
Reproduction is one of the most powerful sources known on this earth. Reproduction allows animal, plants, and other organisms to thrive for generations. All organisms have to reproduce, otherwise their species will simply die out. Out of all of the organisms that reproduce, some of the most interesting include social insects of the Hymenoptera order. Social insects exhibit various interesting traits and strategies that they use for reproduction, such as the formation of a queen, worker reproduction, queen signaling or control, and sexual selection. Many of these traits and strategies can be seen in social wasp populations.
Reproduction is integral to the longevity and evolution of all species, hence the urgency of sexual reproduction. According to Olivia Judson in Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice to All Creation promiscuity amongst females is rampant—not only because sex is pleasurable—but for survival. "Boys are promiscuous and girls are chaste, right? Wrong. The battle of the sexes erupts because, in most species, girls are wanton." (Judson, 2002, p. 9). In fact, female promiscuity determines the evolution of males because if the males spend all their time with females who has no intentions of using their sperm, their genes will not be passed on; and there will be a lack of diversity within the species. When it comes to sexual reproduction and finding a mate, there is no standard agreement on monogamy. Species like the harlequin-beetle-riding pseudoscorpions or the stalk-eyed flies are unashamedly licentious but few remain with one partner. More so, Judson discusses an important point about the compatibility of partners. "Females who mate with two different males are more likely to have children than females who mate with the same male twice." (Judson, 2002, p. 52). In other words, mating with more than one partner secures reproduction.
Sexuality is a necessary means of survival. In order for a population to continue the species relies on sexual reproduction to produce offspring to continue to thrive. There is a natural, internal instinct for sex just like an instinct to seek out food and shelter. They are all drives that we experience in order to keep going. “In most species, females are unwilling to engage in sex except during estrus, a period when the female is ovulating, sex hormone levels are high, and the animal is said to be in heat.” (Garrett, pg. 200) This means that most species of animals only engage in sex when the possibility of reproduction is present. People, however, are interesting because we have a more developed sexual drive. Sexuality for humans is more than just a means of reproduction and continuing our species. Sexuality has become evolved because people experience a much deeper, and social connection through sex with another person. This is not known to be true for many animal species, which is why human sexuality is such a complex
The reproductive systems are based off of the goal to create offspring. Both the male and the female reproductive systems, although fueled by a similar goal, have different components and structures. Both systems are very complex in their own way, making it important for one to understand how each of the systems and their various processes work. Knowing the processes and components of the male and female reproductive systems will aid all people in their life, sometime or another. It’s important to understand how our individual bodies work and how life is produced.