Grendel And Beowulf Comparison Essay

911 Words2 Pages

Storytelling has taken many forms over the years. But what makes a book really engaging is the additional insight given to us by the author that glues our eyes to the book. Through the stories, authors speak from within to relate their version of the plot. First person point of view this is easily done. Though the epic story Beowulf and John Gardener’s Grendel, both provide us with two interestingly amazing stories, the perspective with which the characters are viewed and in which the story is narrated differs greatly. Grendel is written is written in the first point of view, unlike Beowulf which is narrated in the third point of view. Grendel, however, engages the readers in the story more efficiently than Beowulf. The first person style produces more …show more content…

Choosing this person as the narrator can allow authors to more closely show how the story’s events altered the protagonist’s life or helped him overcome a significant internal conflict. Not only does this make it easier for the readers to smoothly read the book, but also allows them to create an imaginative bubble inside their head consisting of the character, as the author builds it. Third person point of view limits the imagination and creativity of the reader. Readers thoroughly enjoy reading Grendel because they get “wallowed” or immersed in a single man’s fallacies, triumphs and fears, “I understood that the world was nothing: a mechanical chaos of casual, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understood that, finally and absolutely, I alone exist” (Gardener 22). Beowulf, on the other hand, neither includes any inner emotion nor the growth of character: “I have wrestled the hilt from the enemies’ hand, avenged the evil done to the Danes; it is what was due” (ll. 1668 - 1670). The difference clearly shows that readers would prefer Grendel’s kind of comfort level over

Open Document