Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social norms and their consequences on society
Social norms modern day
Social norms of today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social norms and their consequences on society
Same Ol’ Same Ol’ Versus the New Traditions and change can go hand-in-hand. Tradition is the passing down of elements of a culture from generation to generation.4 Many may think it is better to carry on traditions, while others may believe the opposite. Change is making a radical difference. Both change and traditions can make a huge impact on one’s life. The question is, is it better to stick with traditions or to change them? In the short story, Green Eggs and Ham by Dr. Seuss, an unnamed character is constantly pressured by the second character named, Sam-I-Am, to try and taste green eggs and ham. The unnamed character continuously refuses to eat and try the food that appears to be new to him. He would rather stick with his normal traditions. …show more content…
The anonymous character stated, “I would not, could not, in a box. I could not, would not, with a fox. I will not eat them with a mouse. I will not eat them in a house. I will not eat them here or there. I will not eat them anywhere. I do not eat green eggs and ham. I do not like them, Sam-I-am.” The character made it very clear to Sam-I-Am that he did not want to try the food. The unnamed character in the book is similar to many people in the film, Powaqqatsi, directed by Geoffery Reggio because they both kept their traditions. One main theme in the film is traditions; many traditions within religions were shown in the film. An example of a religious tradition shown in the film was a little boy walking in the ocean naked. Walking in the ocean naked is a religious tradition that represents the cleansing of one’s self or becoming a new being; many religions utilize this tradition. Another example was men who abruptly stopped in the street to layout a blanket to pray. Prayer is a main tradition in all religions in the world, such as Christianity. Both the unnamed character in Green Eggs and Ham and the religious people in Powaqqatsi, stuck with their traditions no matter what had occurred around them. The film and the short story expressed how traditions are wonderful things. At the end of Green Eggs and Ham, after Sam-I-Am kept asking the unnamed character to try green eggs and ham, he finally gave in and tried it.
The unnamed character said, “Sam! If you will let me be, I will try them. You will see. Say! I like green eggs and ham! I do! I like them, Sam-I-am!” He realized that he enjoy eating green eggs and ham. In a sense, Sam-I-Am was the West trying to force changes on the East (the unnamed character). Bringing changes from the West to the East can be known as industrialization. Industrialization is another main theme in Powaqqatsi. In Powaqqatsi, industrialization took place and new technology was formed. Industrialization is the process in which a society or country (or world) transforms itself from a primarily agricultural society into one based on the manufacturing of goods and services.1 Tall business buildings and factories were built and a train was increasingly moving, which indicated how industrialization began to occur. Radio stations and commercials were created, which referred to new technology, which made the traditions slowly disappear. New things and technology were constantly being created, which made the traditions slowly fade away. In Powaqqatsi and Green Eggs and Ham, people were introduced to new things and their traditions were highly …show more content…
affected. Even though the main character in Green and Eggs and Ham tried the new food he was introduced to, but that does not mean he stuck with that change.
The book did not indicate if the unnamed character continued to eat the food. The story ended with the character saying, “I do so like green eggs and ham! Thank you! Thank you, Sam-I-am!” The book does not clearly states that Sam-I-am convinced the unnamed character to never go back to his traditions. The unnamed character could have reverted to the new change he was introduced to. He could have also tried the change one time, but later reverted back to his own tradition. Reverting or non-reverting to proposed changes also occurred in Powaqqatsi. After the industrialization occurred, many people kept their traditions alive. Religious rituals/traditions, such as walking in the ocean naked and praying on a blanket continually took place. Although some people kept their traditions, other people’s traditions faded away and they adapted to the new changes which had occurred. One scene showed a group of people running in the same, all white, clothing while an old woman was walking in front of the group of people, wearing old, traditional clothes, while balancing a bag upon her head. That scene expressed how the new industrialized world was a mixture of new, but also old traditions. Not all changes were affected on all people in Powaqqatsi. In Green Eggs and Ham and Powaqqatsi, people were introduced to new things and the world changed
around them, but some people stuck with the same ol’ same ol’, while others reverted to the new world. Comparing Powaqqatsi and Green Eggs and Ham to each other is a juxtaposition, though they are alike in many ways. Both pieces of literature dealt with tradition and change. At the beginning of both, traditions were stationary and nothing seemed to changed. As the stories moved along, a few changes were made and may have been kept for a while. Although at the end, the film and the book, showed people (or a person) reverting from a normal tradition, but that doesn’t mean that everyone stuck with the changes. Some people could have reverted back to their old traditions. The ending of both pieces of literature does not clearly state or show if the traditions were continued or if they were ended. The endings were not completely clear, but, in conclusion, sticking with the traditions are better because change is not right for everyone involved with the change.
Culture often means an appreciation of the finer things in life; however, culture brings members of a society together. We have a sense of belonging because we share similar beliefs, values, and attitudes about what’s right and wrong. As a result, culture changes as people adapt to their surroundings. According to Bishop Donald, “let it begin with me and my children and grandchildren” (211). Among other things, culture influences what you eat; how you were raised and will raise your own children? If, when, and whom you will marry; how you make and spend money. Truth is culture is adaptive and always changing over time because
Pollen seeks out to inform not just the misinformed or the health conscious folks, but just anyone who is willing to listen. He is not trying to tell his readers to stop eating fast food, nor is he telling his vegetarian readers to start eating meat. Pollen attempts to inform all his readers about the things that go beyond an ordinary double cheeseburger or the pain one must go through for fresh abalone. He covers all the dilemmas regarding the consumption of an omnivore as far as buying the “food” that was also used in feedlots, to the organic, freshly grown and gathered fungi and fava beans. I’ve been well informed and can no claim I am less ignorant to the topic of food. I may now think twice before I take a bite out of anything, such as where it came from or how it got to be. As for now, I am really craving some chicken nuggets from McDonalds.
Change is good." We hear the catchy phrase everywhere. From company slogans to motivational speeches, our world seems to impose this idea that change is always a good thing. Assuming that the change is for the better, it is probably a true statement in most cases. The root of this idea seems to come from the notion that we are dissatisfied with the state that we are in, so, in order to create a more enjoyable surrounding, we adjust. Others, however, stray from this practice, and instead of trying to adapt to the people around them, they try and change others.
In the story “Carnal Knowledge”, by T. Coraghessan Boyle, Jim is the main character who loves to eat meat. He would love nothing more than to enjoy a dinner of “Beef, mutton, pork, venison, dripping burgers, and greasy ribs”. (1107) However, Jim’s cravings for “Kentucky Fried or Chicken McNuggets” were no match for Alena Jorgensen. (1108) Alena is an obsessive animal rights activist whom Jim met while laying on the beach feeling sorry for himself. When a person has feelings of depression and loneliness it can be very easy for another person to come into their life and change their whole persona.
“Food as thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating,” is an article written by Mary Maxfield in response or reaction to Michael Pollan’s “Escape from the Western Diet”. Michael Pollan tried to enlighten the readers about what they should eat or not in order to stay healthy by offering and proposing a simple theory: “the elimination of processed foods” (443).
It is our cultural heritage that determines how we interact with different people. Cultural heritage is learned through the techniques of our parents, peer groups, schools, religious institutions, government agencies, media, and/or the village community. This learning process also guides the way we speak, how we dress, our lifestyle, food, value system, beliefs, artifacts, and the environment in which we live in. In essence, cultural heritage reflects ones language, ones ways of thinking, art and laws, as well as religion. In addition, learned behavior is defined as being transmitted from one generation to another through the process of enculturation.
For many cultures, tradition is the basis of their history. One example of this is the Hawaiian culture whose history was destroyed when they were forced to stop their ancient dances which told stories of their past. Adversely, tradition has played negative roles in society as well with the battle between the Muslims and Christians in many middle-eastern countries. Tradition plays many roles in today's society. Our goal should be to grasp the idea of what they really mean.
In The Hungry Soul we find an interesting blend of subjects, methods, and traditions. This book is a fascinating exploration of the cultural and natural act of eating. Kass intensely reveals how the various aspects of this phenomenon, restrictions, customs, and rituals surrounding it, relate to collective and philosophical truths about the human being and its deepest pleasures. Kass argues throughout the book that eating (dining) is something that can either cultivate us or moralize us. My question is, does Kass succeed in arguing for the fact that eating is something that can moralize us as human beings? Although I agree with some of the things that Kass discussed in the book, in this paper I will argue mainly against some of his claims.
Christopher McCandless, a young American who was found dead in summer of 1992 in wild land in Alaska, wrote in his diary about his moral struggle regarding killing a moose for survival. According to Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris had to abandon most of the meat since he lacked the knowledge of how to dismantle and preserve it (166-168). Not only did he have a moral dilemma to kill a moose, but also had a deep regret that a life he had taken was wasted because of his own fault. He then started recognizing what he ate as a precious gift from the nature and called it “Holy Food” (Krakauer 168). Exploring relationships between human beings and other animals arouses many difficult questions: Which animals are humans allowed to eat and which ones are not? To which extent can humans govern other animals? For what purposes and on which principles can we kill other animals? Above all, what does it mean for humans to eat other animals? The answer may lie in its context. Since meat-eating has been included and remained in almost every food culture in the world throughout history and is more likely to increase in the future due to the mass production of meat, there is a very small chance for vegetarianism to become a mainstream food choice and it will remain that way.
Thesis: After a long period of time passes people forget the true meaning of their traditions by slowly disregarding as the years pass.
How many people practice or celebrate traditions? I would say every person has their own unique traditions but, also share multiple traditions with others. A tradition is defined as an inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior (Merriam-Webster;1828). Usually when one thinks of a tradition their ideas revolve around a holiday. My initial ideas were Christmas, Easter, or even Thanksgiving. I recognized a trait each of these had in common, saying grace. Saying Grace is a highly respected tradition in my family. At each of the holidays mentioned above, along with others in between, we say grace over our meal before eating.
Traditions are important in any family because they help to pass down knowledge, material objects,
Everyone in the world belongs to a subculture. Each subculture has its own sets of traditions, relics, and artifacts. Relics and artifacts are symbolic, material possessions important to one's subculture. Relics are from the past; artifacts are from the present. These traditions, relics, and artifacts help shape the personalities of individuals and how they relate with others. Individuals know about these items through storytelling in the subculture. Families are good examples of subcultures. My family, a middle-class suburban Detroit family of Eastern European heritage, has helped shape who I am through story telling about traditions, artifacts, and relics.
"Traditions" refers to the specific charge of what is inherited from the past, including all linguistic and symbolic elements that can be transmitted. Traditional is a formal concept, while traditions are material concepts about payload of a traditional. We have always been heir of traditions; we are always preceded by the things that have been said to be
In her book Semiotics and Communication: Signs, Codes, Cultures, Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz describes the wide use of food as signs, and also as social codes. The reason foods are so useful as signs and social codes is because they are separable, easily adaptive to new environments, and it is not difficult to cook, or eat for that matter. Food is a major part of our daily lives, Not only for survival, but it plays a substantial social role in our lives. We will look deeper into the semiotics of food, how food is used as identity markers, and also the role that foods play in social change in our lives. First let us start with the semiotics of food.