Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Antigone and oedipus compare and contrast essay
World influence of Greek culture
Antigone and oedipus compare and contrast essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Antigone and oedipus compare and contrast essay
Another famous Greek tragedian was Sophocles, who composed popular and famous plays, Oedipus the King and Antigone. One reason for Sophocles’ plays to be more impressive and remembered by the current readers is that the chorus in his plays became far less central to the plot than it had been in Aeschylus. Moreover, he invented tritagonist in the stage, which allowed more vivid interactions and detailed relationships between the characters (Puchner 701-702). Although he wrote many great plays during his unusually long, successful, and productive life, unfortunately, only seven remains until today (Puchner 701). Nevertheless, there are still enough evidences in Antigone and Oedipus the King for us to understand why he composed tragedy in the …show more content…
It was a time of prosperity for the city when Medea was performed first in the stage. During the golden age, Greeks society were open to foreigners who wanted to learn Greek democratic ideas and thoughts. But some people also argued that Greek openness to foreigners and their modes of thought also created potential dangerous influence to Greek people. And in the play, Medea was also marked as an outsider in three crucial ways: first, she was a woman in a male-dominated world; and a smart person surrounded by fools; finally, a foreigner in a Greek city (Puchner 785). Indeed, after Jason abandoned her, and remarried with another princess, Medea experienced a great hardship to find a place to live in Greek. And later, because of Jason’s neglect and abandon, Medea resulted in greater helplessness, which eventually bring her to the path for revenge and tragedy. In my opinion, Euripides wanted use the plot to tell the audiences that Greek democracy brought openness to foreigners, but people also needed to be cautious with potential threats in the democracy. Euripides also questioned the position of the gods, as he stated: “… the gods can accomplish what no one would hope for. What we expect may not happen at all, while the god find a way, against all expectation, to do what they want, however surprising. And that is exactly how this case turned out” …show more content…
People might argue many plots in the tragedy are so extreme that rarely happened in an ordinary people’s life. For instance, it’s uncommon for people to kill his father and marry with his mother, as we observed in Oedipus the King. However, the audiences still can sympathize the tragedy, because they all have lost a family member sometimes in their life. And when they saw the tragedy, they will recall their own tragedy in their life, and be comforted by the characters’ misfortune and their inability to solve the issue. This is true for both ancient Greek audiences and current readers. In the golden age of Athens, people were being immersed in the prosperity and happiness of their democratic society. But in the other side, they also needed to face the threat and invasion from outside enemy, in particular, the Persian Empire. Many Greeks lost families in the war, and they saw the tragedy of the sacrifice of Iphigenia, audience emotional loss will be comforted through the compassion to the
The play Medea opens with the revelation that Jason, a Greek explorer, has left his wife Medea for another woman. This infidelity is the primary example of Jason’s distorted principles and symbolizes the strong influence aesthetic standards have over his life. One needs only to read Jason’s debate with Medea to understand Jason’s blindness. While on his quest for the golden fleece, an event that occurred prior to the play, Jason sought Medea’s help to vanquish obstacles that impeded his wanted goal. When Medea mentions this incident during their dispute, Jason replies: “My view is that Cyprus was alone responsible of men and gods for preserving my life. You are clever enough-…but on this question of saving me, I can prove you have certainly got more from me than you gave” (Euripides 17). Jason is so overcome by his own emotions that he stoically believes a lie to ...
Around the time where Greece was known to be the greatest civilization on earth, many people used myths and stories as an extension of their belief because they were culturally significant and important. Ancient Greece was a male-dominated civilization that created laws which would benefit only those with power, which let to the suffering of those without power. The relationship of the sexes was very important, because it showed how men were more superior and woman were frowned upon because they were treated more like minorities. Aeschylus’ “Agamemnon” is about a Greek king who would do anything, including sacrificing his daughter, because he feels as a man and a king whatever decisions he makes are always just. Sophocles’ “Antigone” is about a girl who goes against the religious values of the society, and get persecuted because state laws restrict her
The great Sophoclean play, Oedipus Rex is an amazing play, and one of the first of its time to accurately portray the common tragic hero. Written in the time of ancient Greece, Sophocles perfected the use of character flaws in Greek drama with Oedipus Rex. Using Oedipus as his tragic hero, Sophocles’ plays forced the audience to experience a catharsis of emotions. Sophocles showed the play-watchers Oedipus’s life in the beginning as a “privileged, exalted [person] who [earned his] high repute and status by…intelligence.” Then, the great playwright reached in and violently pulled out the audience’s most sorrowful emotions, pity and fear, in showing Oedipus’s “crushing fall” from greatness.
The problem set at the beginning of the play is that Jason has decided to marry another wife, Glauce. Medea is angered and will not let Jason off without punishment. The loss of Jason is not only a matter of passion; Medea has been completely humiliated by Jason's decision to take a new bride. Her pride shows again when she refuses Jason's aid. Though her situation is difficult, she would rather destroy all than accept help from one who has wronged her so horribly. Living as a barbarian among Greeks has made her more defensive, more full of hurt pride. To punish Jason, Medea had her children deliver poisoned gifts to the new bride, to kill her children, Glauce, and Creon. . Medea is not without feeling, nor is she a sociopath. She comprehends the difference between right and wrong, but chooses to follow the dictates of rage.
In Medea, a play by Euripides, Jason possesses many traits that lead to his downfall. After Medea assists Jason in his quest to get the Golden Fleece, killing her brother and disgracing her father and her native land in the process, Jason finds a new bride despite swearing an oath of fidelity to Medea. Medea is devastated when she finds out that Jason left her for another woman after two children and now wants to banish her. Medea plots revenge on Jason after he gives her one day to leave. Medea later acts peculiarly as a subservient woman to Jason who is oblivious to the evil that will be unleashed and lets the children remain in Corinth. The children later deliver a poisoned gown to Jason’s new bride that also kills the King of Corinth. Medea then kills the children. Later, she refuses to let Jason bury the bodies or say goodbye to the dead children he now loves so dearly. Jason is cursed with many catastrophic flaws that lead to his downfall and that of others around him.
Euripides uses indirect/direct characterization of Medea, the plays antagonist, to help the readers understand a deeper reason for the things she has done, including kill her own brother and children. Through the use of the chorus, and other minor factors, we, as the audience, get to mentally interpret Medea’s side of the problems she and Jason undergo, and try to understand what she is going through and how she feels. Does she do it out of spite or out of revenge? Was she really in love with Jason, and was he worth killing all of these people she so deeply cared about? Although Medea is portrayed as the villain in the play due to her actions and rage, indirect/direct characterization from herself, other characters, and most importantly, the chorus, all reveal a deeper understanding as to why Medea did what she did and how she felt in the midst of all these problems she faced.
These ideas were not very popular during this time period. Euripides was scrutinized for his writing and the way his plot twisted. It is important to remember that we can’t use these injustices as excuses for our actions, but notice that these problems can create others. Medea gained power from these issues and showed signs of a strong character, but the end result was not for the better.
*Although Medea is arguably the most intelligent character in Euripides’s piece, shown in her dialogue with Creon, she has become ridiculed, and viewed as barbarous and less desirable following her separation from Jason. She is no longer a wife to a Greek man. She is simply an outsider, and a burden on a prosperous
Medea has been exiled for three times: from her home country near the Black Sea, from Jason's homeland Iolchos, and now from the city of Corinth. We would naturally think that a woman like Medea, being exiled for many times, is the most vulnerable and most powerless woman. She has got no friend and no citizenship. At the time of Euripides, being an exile is not an interesting position that a person wants to be in. It is like a suicide. Most people at that time in Greece view strangers as barbarians with no intelligence at all. In addition, Medea is going to be an exile with two children. She is supposed to be in lots of trouble. On the other hand, Jason has won the princess of Corinth's love. He is going to be Creon's son-in-law. Jason abandon's Medea after all she has done for him. Jason doesn't fear Medea at all because he has support from Creon, king of Corinth. Jason is supposed to be more powerful than Medea. Jason is the son-in-law of the king and Medea is an exile. But, as Euripides suggests, what the audience expects doesn't come true at all.
In Greek society, the role of women was considered to be insignificant compared to the Greek men. The women had very few rights, no room to voice personal opinions, and a very bleak future with few options for a better life. According to Moses Hades, professor of Greek studies, women in ancient Greek plays are known to be the main characters and take the role of the villain, victim, or the heroine. In Euripides’ play Medea, Medea, the main character, plays all these roles. She represents the heroine by helping her husband secure the Golden Fleece prior to their marriage, and then portrays the victim by being betrayed by her husband, and finally the villain by murdering her loved ones. Therefore, Euripides follows the standard format for a Greek tragedy.
Medea’s illegitimate marriage and the betrayal of Jason drive Medea to extreme revenge. Medea chooses to act with her immortal self and commit inhumane acts of murder rather than rationalize the outcomes of her actions. Medea see’s this option as her only resort as she has been banished and has nowhere to go, “stripped of her place”. To create sympathy for Medea, Euripides plays down Medea’s supernatural powers until the end of the play. Throughout the play Medea represents all characteristics found in individual women put together, including; love, passion, betrayal and revenge. Medea’s portrayal of human flaws creates empathetic emotions from the audience. The audience commiserates with Medea’s human flaws as they recognize them in themselves. Medea plays the major role in this play as she demonstrates many behavioral and psychological patterns unlike any of the other Greek women in the play; this draws the audience’s attention to Medea for sympathy and respect.
Sophocles’ Oedipus is the tragedy of tragedies. An honorable king is deceived and manipulated by the gods to the point of his ruination. In the face of ugly consequences Oedipus pursues the truth for the good of his city, finally exiling himself to restore order. Sophocles establishes emotional attachment between the king and the audience, holding them in captivated sympathy as Oedipus draws near his catastrophic discovery. Oedipus draws the audience into a world between a rock and a hard place, where sacrifice must be made for the greater good.
The play Oedipus the King by Sophocles has often been described as the story of a “tragic hero.” This story is indeed tragic; however, Oedipus is not the only character stricken by tragedy. Equally stricken may be the character of Jocasta. She, as well as Oedipus, suffers many tragedies throughout the story. Shifting the story to a different perspective quite possibly may increase how we view it. The point is not to denounce Oedipus’ role as a tragic hero, but to denounce his role as the only tragic character.
Euripides brought both elements of realism and melodrama into this play, which are evidenced through the actions, characteristics, and emotions that the characters posses. Throughout the entire play we receive a sense of melodrama because we are torn with emotions between the characters. At first we sympathize with Medea because she has transformed into the sort of wife that is required in society, but is still abandoned by Jason. She reacts in accordance with her qualities and in the nature that a woman who is betrayed would react to. In the beginning of the play, the nurse says,”And poor Medea is slighted, and cries aloud on the vows they made to each other, the right hands clasped.”(1) This quote allows us to image the pain that Medea must be feeling, and therefore we become aware that she is a prideful woman that will not under any circumstances just sit around all alone in misery. Once Medea realizes that she wants to take matters into her own hands and seek revenge, she says,”It is best to go straight road, the one in which I am most skilled, and make away with them by poison.”(13) It is at this point at which we realize the plans that Medea is planning and we begin to sympathize Jason. Although what he did was unjust and coward like, we feel that no father should be put in a position in which he is incapable of saving
... takes matters into her own hands and doesn’t wait for a man to handle things for her. Also, her internal conflict that is visible throughout the entire play signify that she actually thinks for herself, and is strong enough to need to make serious decisions on her own, regardless of her gender. All of this goes back on the traditional Greek society, and helps make Medea into a play that is ahead of its time. With Euripides challenging the notion of misogyny, he creates Medea to show how powerful and dangerous a woman can be in a story, even though it was never heard of in the modern eras.