Graffiti Is Bad

495 Words1 Page

Graffiti is not art because it does not make our neighborhood look pretty and it destroying property. Others will refer to graffiti as a violence attractor. Many say the guns inside some of the drawings will lead to more violence and more killings. Referring to guns does not kill people; the people who pull the trigger kill people. It’s a bad way to do graffiti. Graffiti is not legal but it still vandalism. When people today talk about graffiti it is most frequently thought of with some negative. Some consider it to be synonymous with vandalism or even property destruction. But for all intents and purposes graffiti has existed since prehistoric times and has also given us great insight into more recent cultures and civilizations as well. Graffiti’, so as to distinguish it from the broader term “Street Art. …show more content…

Graffiti is considered art and is becoming increasingly recognized as a legitimate art form in the art industry. Graffiti can be colorful or in black and white. Art is an art because it have happiness and creativeness artworks, expressing the author's imaginative or technical skill, intended to be appreciated for their beauty or emotional power. Art is a good thing to do. The methods and skills used for painting, sculpting, drawing, etc. The people who create art that are created to be beautiful or to express important ideas or feelings. Art is better than Graffiti. Art is constructive, Graffiti tagging is

More about Graffiti Is Bad

Open Document