The fall of the Roman Empire
For a long period of time, the Roman Empire had been the largest military power. Conquering large portions of Europe, parts of North Africa and Middle East, they seemed unstoppable. During a course of their governing, the Roman Empire designed, invented and developed foundations still used now days. At that time, the citizens of the Roman Empire enjoyed many services from public health to being able to own their land and conduct trade. However, the government corruption, economic problems and the invasion of the barbarian tribes caused the decay of the Roman empire.
The government corruption was one of the major problems that led to the fall of the Roman Empire. For instance, there was constant rivalry among the generals who fought each other, bribery and the abuse of the power of the emperors. Based on the surrounding circumstances and the fact that there was no specific and well-planned way of handling the monetary system the government corruption rose to the
…show more content…
point of being unfixable. Economic trouble was another reason for the decay of the Roman Empire.
One of the main indicators was the lavish life styles of the wealthy. The wealthy spent money they collected from taxes on food and drinks. Furthermore, for unknown reasons, the economy in some of the Roman cities began to weaken and people became bound to their lands not being able to trade and high taxes.
Throughout its time, the Roman Empire had been surrounded by the “barbarians.” In addition, they were surrounded by the Celts in Wales and Scotland, Persians and Arabs. The Romans tried to stop them from entering the empire by hunting for them outside the border line, but without adequate border protection they were unable to stop everyone. For instance, the thing that separated the Roman empire and the other territories was a border line. Equally important, other newly mobilized armies from the middle east and the Hans, under their leader Attila played a major role in depigmentation of the Roman
Empire. Define Feudalism Feudalism was the system created to provide government in the areas where no local government existed. In the feudal system, the highest in the chain of command was the count (lord). The region count owned a large part of the land, “a few hundred square miles.” The Count’s job was to keep the peace and control the lesser lords “vassals” and the “serfs” in the in his reign. The vassals were either forced or willingly accepted the count’s protection. Equally important, count protected their vassals by assuring them they would keep the justice on his land as well as a long and firm status of the land he owned. For example, if two vassals of the same lord had a disagreement over the same village the lord would intervene and solve their problems. Furthermore, if the vassal died young leaving children, the count would take them under his guardianship, ensuring the right inheritor would receive their part at the appropriate time. A further and equally important, was that the vassals served the lord in his court for the judging solving the disputes. The vassal did not own any financial obligations to his lord, however if the lord needed to be captured from the captivity, or the lords’ children were getting married, the vassal would be obligated to pay the fee. Under feudalism no one was in charge. “King and people, lord and vassal, were joined in a kind of contract.” For instance, everyone was responsible for accomplishing their task. If a vassal refused to do his job the king had the authority to intervene and fix the issue. However, in doing so, the king needed to make sure that the actions he took did not violate his rights because, “if the king violated the rights of the vassal, the vassals could join against the king.” The citizens of the village governed by the specific Lord and a vassal were “serfs.” The serfs were “bound to the soil,” meaning they were not allowed to leave without the lord’s approval. Williams, S. (n.d) Corruption and the Decline of Rome. Retrieved from http://www.historytoday.com/stephen-williams/corruption-and-decline-rome
The Roman empire was a very large and successful empire, although like many things it had to come to an end. The three primary reasons that had most contributed to Rome's fall is foreign invasions, military weakness , and weak leadership.
From about 50 BCE to the year 200 CE, the Roman Empire was a powerful nation. Rome was the city that became the center of the Roman Empire and by 200 BCE Rome became a powerhouse. The Romans conquered Scotland to Spain, controlled the Mediterranean Sea, and established colonies in North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. By the year 44 BCE Julius Caesar became a Roman Emperor and Rome had a great military. Then around the 5th century CE the Roman Empire began to weaken. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome was because of the Roman Emperors, the Roman Army, and foreign invasion.
The year is 476 A.D. and the Roman Empire has collapsed after being overthrown by barbarians. Looking back, the causes of Rome’s decline can be separated into four categories, social, economic, military, and political. The social aspects of Rome’s fall are the rise of christianity and civil wars. The rise of christianity displaced Rome’s polytheistic roots which viewed the emperor as having a godly status. Pope and church leaders took an increased role in political affairs which further complicated governance. Civil wars also deteriorated the empire. More than 20 men took the throne in only 75 years and the empire was thrust into chaos. The economic aspects of Rome’s fall were high taxes from the government and labor deficit. The roman empire
The fall of the Western Roman Empire was the first example in history on the collapse of a constitutional system which was caused by the internal decay in political, military, economics, and sociological issues. The government was becoming corrupt with bribery. Commanders of the Roman army turned their own army inward towards their own Constitutional systems, fueled by their own ruthless ambition. This paper will talk about how the violence and internal turmoil in 133B.C.-27 B.C. was what provoked the economic stagnation in the city of Rome and to the end of the Republic and the many corrupt politicians and generals who only thought of nothing more than personal gains and glory. The senate lost control of the Roman military and the reason they rose against the senate was because the senate were no longer able to help manage the social problems or the military and administrative problems of the empire. The economics of the Roman Empire soon hit rock bottom due to the high taxation to support the army. Gold was also eroding since Rome was no longer bringing new resources through the expansion. Emperors then tried to mint coins out of silver and copper instead and the end result was inflation and dramatic rises in
The Romans have had almost every type of government there is. They've had a kingdom, a republic, a dictatorship, and an empire. Their democracy would be the basis for most modern democracies. The people have always been involved with and loved their government, no matter what kind it was. They loved being involved in the government, and making decisions concerning everyone. In general, the Romans were very power-hungry. This might be explained by the myth that they are descended from Romulus, who's father was Mars, the god of war. Their government loving tendencies have caused many, many civil wars. After type of government, the change has been made with a civil war. There have also been many civil wars between rulers. But it all boils
Many factors contribute to the success of a society and determine the supremacy of the entire empire. The most evident of these factors is the common wealth of the population. This wealth is not merely calculated in monetary form but comprises the amount of resources and military power an empire possesses. The endless necessity in an increase of wealth in Rome could have led to the expansion. Since the land was not rich in resources and the soil was not the greatest for agriculture, expansion of the Roman border...
These strengths were a strong foundation, standardization of many elements across the empire, and strong leaders who were able to effectively rule. The loss of these strengths would ultimately lead to the downfall of the Roman Empire. As time passed, the empire grew further from its original foundation, losing sight of many of its original attributes inherited from the Republic. In addition, they grew over-extended as an empire, making standardization very difficult if not virtually impossible. As future emperors attempted to extend aspects of the empire to these outlying areas, their power to do so was challenged by external influences. All of this caused an erosion of the cohesion which the standardization had brought, especially when the empire was divided between East and West. Lastly, as emperors stopped effectively using the strengths which had been used by past emperors, specifically the manipulation of the upper class and the Senate, the empire grew gradually weaker. Unable to manage such a massive empire virtually alone, even strong emperors were often left in weak positions, unable to deal with the frequent Germanic intrusions and military revolts. In short, many of the things which enabled the Roman Empire to survive for over 400 years were also the things which ultimately led to or enabled its
There are so many powerful countries and governments today, but have you ever wondered what were the most powerful ancient empires and what happened to them over the years. The Roman Empire was at once a very flourishing and thriving place to live, but then all of a sudden it began to fall and decline until it was a weak and vulnerable empire. Historians debate the issue of why it declined and eventually fell. They ask themselves the question, what are the main reasons for the fall of Rome? The main reasons for the fall of Rome were their military struggles, political problems, and the disasters they encountered during that time period.
The Roman Empire was a great and big empire that lasted hundreds of years. It had a great impact on a lot of civilizations. The Romans went from a small civilization to one of the greatest empire of all. But then, was ripped apart into pieces until there was nothing left.
The empire that the Roman’s built can be argued to have been the greatest in world history. The Roman Empire controlled the largest land area in European history and influenced a huge region, acting as a cultural center for the entire continent of Europe. Their strength derived from their prowess and skill on the battlefield. The Roman Army was extremely effective and became the basis of our military structure today by utilizing technological advances in strategy and weaponry, and simply having more discipline.
A large reason why Rome fell was because its population began to drop significantly which then led to many economic issues. A decline in population meant that
The fall of the Western Roman Empire was a major problem, and the political aspects were partly to blame. One reason why the political demeanor of the Western Roman Empire was partially the cause of the fall, was that Western Rome had several unfit rulers. The emperors were greedy, and cruel enough to do unfair actions for power. These emperors inherited the throne, and that led to these ability lacking rulers. In addition, there was no cycle for the Emperors. In the United States Of America, if the president is no longer able to rule, the vice president takes over.
One of the most common causes of the decline of an empire results from having weak military power and martial spirit. In order for an empire to be successful, that empire must present a strong will to fight or sacrifice property and life in order to defend its state. If an empire does not possess this characteristic, it often will quickly diminish. For example, the Roman Empire became successful because of the willingness of the males to defend the state. Shortly after, the males lost their willingness to defend and the empire had to recruit unreliable mercenaries to fight in war. Unlike the successful army of the past, these mercenaries did not have true loyalty to Rome. Because of constant warfare, the Romans had heavy military spending. The Roman Empire had become too large to control effortlessly. Families and soldiers in parts of the Roman Empire adopted local customs. The Roman Empire was made up not only of natives from the Italian peninsula, but it was also made up of barbarians from the conquered lands. The barbarians were very knowledgeable when it came to Roman warfare and military tactics. Corruption became widespread throughout the Em...
middle of paper ... ... In my opinion, this is the major factor pertaining to the collapse of the Roman Empire. The political corruption allowed the Praetorian Guard to be above the law and announce whoever they wanted as Emperor regardless of whether they were capable of the task. The dependence on slave labour caused high unemployment and the stagnation of technology for the last 400 years of the Roman Empire.
The Roman’s had its ups and downs, but they made a lasting effect on today’s world, the establishment of law, the creation of the democratic government and the increase of Christianity ("Roman Influences," n.d.). We were also left with tangible items such as art and the delicate and beautiful artifacts. The empire was also known to help spread Latin Language, which formed the foundation of the English language ("Roman Influences,"