Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The case for bureaucracy essay
Merits and evils of bureaucracy
Importance of bureaucracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The case for bureaucracy essay
In the book, The Case for Bureaucracy author, Charles T. Goodsell conveys his assertion for bureaucracy. He argues that Americans have a lot of wariness concerning the government. Goodsell’s major takeaway however, is that wariness in government is normal it promotes checks and balances yet, this is the sole reason why college graduates do not want to become a part of public service careers.
Goodsell’s overall theme of The Case for Bureaucracy is the negative reputation bureaucracy has towards Americans. He explains a few good run ins he has had we bureaucrats during his time however, his example about the US Postal Office is most relatable. When Goodsell states that even though the US Postal Service “collects and delivers 650 million items to 130 million mailing addresses six times a week, with 93 percent of them arriving on time” (Goodsell p. 4) people still complain about the one or two packages that arrives late. He argues that just because these few packages come late does not mean the whole agency is inefficient; simply put he implies do not let a few
…show more content…
bad apples ruin the whole batch. This distrust Americans have with bureaucracy comes in three forms, Goodsell writes, “We survey this extensive material under three topics of criticism: (1) poor performance, (2) excessive power, and (3) oppression of the induvial” (Goodsell 11).
I disagree with Goodsell more specifically the first two points. I believe Americans see government as poor performing is because government works for the majority which is why we have nonprofits; they work for the minorities. Let me explain, there are many government services out there to help a majority of people but sometimes it does not always go according to plan like the Veterans Association. The VA can only do so much which is why it is important to have nonprofits like The GI GO Fund or The Wounded Warriors Project to help them out. So, I believe the government is only looked at as poor performing is because they can only help majority of citizens and not
all. To his second point, however, I believe Americans do find the government excessive because of their need to help the majority of Americans. Since the government has to do so much for Americans from their healthcare to transportation to education to social security the government can seem overbearing at times. Like Goodsell states government is the only “legal monopoly.” Yet the people who has a problem with the widespread of government do not look to understand that if government decrease their size, life will be a lot harder for the ones who depend on the government to help them put.
The curse of civil service reform to George W. Plunkitt was that patriotic young men could not get jobs without passing the civil service examinations. Plunkitt's objections about civil service reform are two fold, not only cou...
The U.S. Government is among the most successful governments known to man currently. The U.S. government is made up of a democracy, but this democracy was not put together on its own. It was first compiled by many other societies but mainly two in particular- the Greek and the Romans. These two historical powerhouses were and still are mainly known for their armies, agriculture, and their governments. These two formed the U.S. government that the world knows and fears and respects today.
Often, when the discussion of American bureaucracy is broached in conversation, those holding these conversations often think of the many men and women who operate behind the scenes within the government. This same cross section of Americans is looked upon as the real power within the federal government and unlike the other branches of government, has little to no oversight. A search of EBSCO resulted in the following definition, an organization “structure with a rigid hierarchy of personnel, regulated by set rules and procedures” (Bureaucracy, 2007). Max Weber believed that a bureaucracy was technically the most efficient form of organization, one structured around official functions that are bound by rules, each function having its own specified competence (2007). This wide ranging group of Americans has operated within the gaps, behind the scenes, all under the three core branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The division of government into three branches and separate powers gives each branch both exclusive powers and some additional power...
Modern Bureaucracy in the United States serves to administer, gather information, conduct investigations, regulate, and license. Once set up, a bureaucracy is inherently conservative. The reason the bureaucracy was initiated may not continue to exist as a need in the future. The need or reason may change with a change in the times and the culture needs. A bureaucracy tends to make decisions that protect it and further it’s own existence, possibly apart from the wishes of the populace. It may not consistently reflect what might be optimal in terms of the needs and wants of the people. Local governments employ most of the United States civil servants. The 14 cabinet departments in the U.S. are run day-to-day by career civil servants, which have a great deal of discretionary authority.
- government does not achieve the things we credit it with: it does not "keep the country free, settle the West, or educate"
I agree: our government is out of control. Our economies problems are mainly from “…bad policy decisions that have led to the rapid migration of American jobs overseas, the degradation of the American education system, and continuous costly wars” (King, 2011). The governmen...
The mainstream view of bureaucracy identifies problems of poor motivation, poor customer service and resistance to change, while the critical view accuses its instrumental rationality and narrow focus on efficiency to not only be demotivating but also dehumanising. With regard to post-bureaucracy, the mainstream approach critiques its problems of fragile control, risk and bias, while the critical perspective contends that its method of normative control is still an exertion of power over employees carried out by senior
Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed upon, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow. Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would fain succeed in letting one another alone; and, as has been said, when it is most expedient, the governed are most let alone by it.
The purpose of this paper is to critique an essay written by Max Weber entitled “Bureaucracy”. Authors Walter E. Natemeyer and J. Timothy McMahon determined that Weber’s aforementioned essay on bureaucracy would be considered a classic piece of writing that should be included in the 2001 release of their book, Classics of Organizational Behavior. Max Weber articulated his concept of bureaucracy by proposing six principles that characterized bureaucracy (Natemeyer & McMahon, 2001). According to researchers, Weber’s essay is often read as “part of his social science, listing observable functions that turn a civil service into a reliable institution of state control: a bureaucracy” (Gale & Hummel, 2003). Weber’s original work, Essays in Sociology, was translated into Englis...
Gormley, W. T., & Balla, S. J. (2008). Bureaurcracy and democracy. (Third ed.). Washington DC: Sage.
Government is the problem, not the solution. Most of the bad matter that happen in our authorities can be traced back to money. Whenever you see congress oppose legislating that is popular among the people, it’s always because there’s a big society (money) lobbying against it.
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
Politics-Administration Dichotomy essentially has a two part meaning; there are two functions of government for this idea, as the name implies politics, and administration. The argument about the dichotomy between politics and public administration has been around for several years with no overall consensus on why they should be distinct from one another. Looking critically at both sides of the idea, there are ways to demonstrate an accurate presentation of the administrative agencies working and there are also ways they have proved to be inaccurate. There are just as many downfalls to a politicized bureaucracy. There will be more benefits to the politics-administration dichotomy view with the concept put in place by Woodrow Wilson. He simply promotes a clear distinction between politics and administration and supports the idea that they are interdependent of one another, and they require one another for the appropriate balance between democracy and efficiency. The idea of Wilson’s concept will allow agencies to gain the most efficiency through interdependence of politics-administration.
Wilson makes a comparison between the government systems of America and Europe and his intentions were not necessarily for America to do the same as Europe, but for us to explore and research other governments and public administrations, so that we can analyze and master our own. It is questionable why other governments have been more successful with certain matters than our own here in America. Wilson expresses relevant concerns and arguments that government systems should be further studied and improved as, it is crucial and ultimately beneficial to the nation and it’s
Bureaucracy is an organizational design based on the concept of standardization. “It is characterized by highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization, very formalized rules and regulations, tasks that are grouped into functional departments, centralized authority, narrow spans of control, and decision making that follows the chain of command” (Judge & Robbins, 2007, p.