Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good people david foster wallace analysis
Good people david foster wallace analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the story “Good People” by David foster, Lane is the main character who has to take a very important decision in his life, along with Sheri. Sheri is Lane’s girlfriend and is pregnant, but they are both thinking about abortion, since both are very young. They are Christian people with strong beliefs in God but since they have committed a sin which was carried by desire; everything has changed, for both of them. Lane is thinking of repentance and going to hell because he has committed fornication, and his bad thoughts that also make him doubt if he truly believes in God. Lane wants to be “good people” because what others might think of him, mainly God, Shari, his parents, and other people around him.
He wants to be “good people” to make himself
…show more content…
He is afraid to leave her alone and wants to be with her, but at the same time he doesn’t want to be with her if the baby is included. He has thoughts in the story of him leaving her alone as a single mother. He wishes deep inside him that she could tell him “she will carry this and have it, and love it and make no claim on Lane except his good wishes and respecting what she has to do.” Lane doesn’t want the responsibilities and doesn’t want Shari abort the baby but only if she takes care of the baby by herself. He doesn’t want the baby included in this relationship because he knows both are not ready. This will destroy their future and he will have to work even harder to help her with this …show more content…
Kidder the author compares tough choices through energetic self-reflection. He says that right versus right should always be the priority, but if you see the problem as right versus wrong than you are already a bad person. Lane is looking his problem as a right versus wrong, because he doesn’t know if aborting the baby is right or wrong. We don’t really know what would be his action toward his problem but just thinking about his thoughts we conclude that he is not really a “good person” like he wants to be. “It is right to honor a woman’s right to make decisions affecting her body and the right to protect the lives of the unborn.” This is an example the author considers as a tough choice; one right value against another one. (16 Kidder). The author explains that really tough choices like Lane’s don’t center upon right versus wrong, they involve right versus right. To explain this further there are three categories a tough problem could fall into in this case for lanes decision, its Ends-based
Reading this part from “A Good Man is Hard to Find” I would think from The Misfit saying this would really be him feeling sorry that he killed his father. Nevertheless if you are coming at this quote from another point you could think he was losing his real father and also god at the same time. Which would make him feel guilty and become the killer he is today. So before losing his father and becoming a killer he could have been a perfect church boy like anybody would be.
...has either a good outcome or a bad one. For the couple in “Good People” Sheri will make her decision based on how she feels, and Lane Dean will make the decision to stand by her side. Because both people will make their own choses and will not be forced into making a decision based on the other person’s feeling the couple has a great chance of making it. However, the couple in “Hill like White Elephants” are going to have an uphill battle. Jig will be manipulated into having an abortion by the American, which later on in the relationship will cause Jig to resent him. Even though these stories are about couples making a chose whether to keep the baby or have an abortion, it’s also about begin able to make decisions without feeling pressured. The only way to feel confident in your chose is by making the decision you are willing to live with for the rest of your life.
A Good Man is Hard to Find, there are two main characters whose faith should be analyzed: “the grandmother” and “the Misfit”. We can use Paul Tilloch’s six components to analyze their faith. The grandmother seems to have a great understanding of what faith is in five of the The Misfit is not “ultimately concerned” about his faith. The Misfit was confused as to why he was sent to prison and why he was punished in the ways that he was.
...rson and he knows that she will take care of the little guy even if the Guy is not around. A distort desire to be free of the situation drive the whole family into tragedy and leave them grieves
Marquis believes abortion to be extremely immoral. However he mentions that there are exceptions in rare but certain circumstances where abortion is acceptable. We can infer that these instances would include situations that would put the mother or child at serious risk by keeping the fetus. He is frustrated that this idea has received minimal support recently. As a result he wants to influence change in society in hopes of receiving the support and publicity this topic deserves. Marquis’ primary argument stems from the idea of killing in general. He explains it is immoral to kill an adult because it prematurely deprives the human of something they may have valued at the time they were killed, as well as something they may had valued in the future. Although the victim may not realize it at the time of their death, they certainly had a valuable future ahead of them to experience which has been cut short. We are the only ones who can decide what is valuable to them; in this case we value some things more than others, and this concept differs from person to person. For example, in the present I value the life I am given and the opportunity I have to earn my degree at Villanova University while also valuing my future as well knowing that I have a chance to be successful in the future. Although I have not succeeded yet, I still value that opportunity I have and the life I’m capable of achieving through earning a degree. Therefore, he connects this same theory to the life of a fetus. By killing the fetus the result is the same, we are depriving it of its futur...
David Foster Wallace’s “Good People,” is a very touching, powerful story about a young, unwed, Christian couple facing an extremely difficult decision and the moral and religious implications that may result. As the story begins, we are allowed into the head of Lane Dean, a college student, as he sits on a park bench with his girlfriend, Sheri. Lane and Sheri find themselves faced with an unplanned pregnancy, which causes them to battle with several moral and religious dilemmas. Both of them are devout Christians who have built their moral beliefs upon God and their religious upbringing. Although torn Sheri schedules an abortion, which weighs on Lane deeply. Lane, frozen in fear and not having the courage to freely talk to Sheri about the situation, has a conversation with her in his own head which leads him to question love, morals, religion and life. As they face this unwanted pregnancy, Lane, controlled by fear realizes that sometimes in life certain situations are too complicated to solely be answered within the rigidity of religion. People are human and regardless of how strong their faith in religion is, the battle between right and wrong will forever exist. Ultimately, Sheri decides to carry the child, which Lane assumes is a statement of Sheri’s faith in him. Inspired by her leap of faith, Lane decides to break free from the fear, muster up some courage and ultimately makes a leap of faith of his own and decides to give loving her a try. Lane’s epiphany leads to the central idea that sometimes it takes breaking the confines of fear and having faith in love or in another person to win the battle between right and wrong, which Wallace conveys beautifully.
Imagine being told that you do not have the right to choose what you do with your own body. You are presented with a situation that you are not mentally, physically, or financially prepared for, but you are told that you are not allowed an opinion that could change the outcome. You are forced to deal with it, ruin your life for the next eighteen years because you made a mistake and you do not have the option of fixing it. During the 1980’s, those against abortion attempted to get a constitution amendment passed that would ban abortions nationally (Newsman). In 1985, John Irving published the novel The Cider House Rules, discussing the topic of the right to choose and how it affects those who are denied it. He uses
A considerable difference is that Marquis’ beliefs are associated with the uncertainty of the future whereas Tooley’s beliefs are invested in the present. Tooley claims that because a fetus isn 't a fully capable person, a fetus is not afforded a merit in a decision such an abortion. Tooley’s argument is based solely on what the fetus is capable of before birth. Marquis’ argument is based on potential following birth. Marquis holds the value of a human future to a high regard. Marquis makes a profound point when he compares the refusal to kill suicidal teens to the anti-abortion position. He emphasizes that the reasoning for not killing suicidal teens is solely because the teen could possibly posses “the desire at some future time to live.” Thus, simply because one is not capable of desiring life does not mean one is not worthy of
In the essay “On Mortality,” Joan Didion poses the question, “What is “right” and what is “wrong”?” (182) In today’s society, people do not usually consider the question at hand before they take action, because morality has become a topic that can scarcely be defined. For example, Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines mortality as “the quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.” The brings up the fact that everyone has their own opinion of right and wrong. This difference of opinion on what is moral causes many disputes such as in the topic of abortion. Some people believe that it is a woman’s prerogative to choose whether or not to have a child, while many others believe it is “morally” wrong. On the other hand, there are moderates who disagree with the idea or the morality of abortion, but agree that there are certain circumstances that should give the woman the option. Since abortion is essentially the killing of an unborn child, why are women who abort not convicted as murderers; just as women who kill their children f...
Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus. While I regard the moral status of the foetus as important, it is not the central issue that determines the moral justifiability of abortion. The foetus may be awarded a level of moral status, nevertheless, such status does not result in the prescription of a set moral judgement. As with many morally significant issues, there are competing interests and a variety of possible outcomes that need to be considered when making a moral judgement on abortion. While we need to determine the moral status of the foetus in order to establish the type of entity we are dealing with, it does not, however, exist in a moral vacuum. There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus. Furthermore, I assert that moral status should be awarded as a matter of degree, based upon the capacities of sentience and self-consciousness an entity possesses. In a bid to reach a coherent conclusion on the issue, the moral status of both foetus and woman, along with the likely results of aborting a particular foetus, must be considered together. Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.
In Flannery O 'Connor 's short story, A Good Man is Hard to Find, the theme of good vs. evil unravels throughout the series of tragic events. The Grandmother’s epiphany introduces the idea of morality and the validity is left to the interpretation of the reader. By questioning the characteristics of right and wrong, morality and religion become subjective to personal reality and the idea of what makes individuals character good or bad becomes less defined.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
According to Judith Thomson in her book “A Defense of Abortion”, a human embryo is a person who has a right to life. But, just because the human fetus has the right to life does not mean that the mother will be forced to carry it (Thomson, 48). Naturally, abortion may be seen as the deliberate termination of a pregnancy before the fetal viability. Though people have understood this, the topic of abortion has remained a controversial issue in the world. Individuals are divided into “Pro-choice” and “Pro-life” debaters depending on their opinion on the morality of the action. "Pro-life," the non-consequentialist side, is the belief that abortion is wrong, generally because it equates to killing. "Pro-choice," the consequentialist view, however,
Whatever sins man commits in his lifetime, he is punished for them. If only he repents for his sins, can he be forgiven and at least he can die in peace. God forgives them only when they repent for their sins. The story also presents another example of the Christian belief in sin and punishment, which is based on the strict principles of repentance and forgiveness. In the story, Karen is a poor but beautiful girl.