In “Godfather Death 1812” by Jakob and Wilhmen Grimm, the story is composed of six C’s. To begin with, the characters on the process of the story on how the characters handle what happens, the contrast on how is one different from others. The conflict in the story it doesn’t have to be a fight but, just who is against whom. The complication on the story on what keeps the story from ending at a point where it should have ended, and the climax is when it’s at the most exiting point of the story. Throughout the story each of the 6’c will be identified allowing for the story to be very understanding. The characters in “Godfather Death 1821” by Jakob and Wilhmen Grimm are many and each character has its own role to play. The main character on …show more content…
the “Godfather Death 1821” is the doctor, and Death. The doctor is the thirteenth son of the poor man; he is a spoiled greedy person for asking much, not listening and not obeying. Death is a character, who offered to be the godfather of the children thirteenth, and he is serious character because he told his godchild to obey his rules. The poor man is a major character who has 13 sons, he is a hard worker, and also he is a realistic character because he chooses a godfather that would be more convenient for his thirteenth son. However, there are minor characters in this story; one of them is the king, he got ill the doctor cured him. Other minor characters is the Devil, and God who offered to be the godfather of the thirteenth child, and the princess who got ill after the king got cured by the doctor. In this story the contrast is who is different from the others. The doctor is different from the other on the way he is spoiled. The poor man differs from other on how he is a hard worker and is looking for what is best for his thirteenth children in financially and in profession. Lastly Death, he differs from other on how he is generous for offering to be the godfather, and forgiving his godchild for the mistake he made first. The conflict here on this story is, man vs self, and man vs unknown. Man vs self, the doctor thought to himself that he could do as he wishes because his godfather Death would forgive him if he makes a mistake with him. Man vs Unknown, the poor man didn’t accept god, or the devil to be godfather of his thirteenth child; instead he picked Death as a godfather because Death offered the poor man that his thirteenth child will be a doctor and rich. In this story the complication is the part where the story keeps on going when it could of end.
Furthermore, the only complication on the story is when Death gave another opportunity to the doctor after the doctor disobeys Death. Death told the doctor to not give any herb to an ill person to cure if Death was at that ill person’s feet, because that person needed to die. Thus, the doctor did not listen, and did what he want because he though Death would forgive him. But, Death gave him another opportunity and the story continued up to where he does the same mistake again and the doctor dies. The climax on the story is at the moment the Doctor gave the princess the herb so he could marry her and be the king. This was the climax, the most exciting point because the doctor gave the herb to the king who was sick, and Death was at the king’s feet. Therefore, Death told the doctor to not give anyone else the herb or there will be consequences, and so the king’s daughter got ill, the doctor gave the princess the herb. This was the moment of climax because as a reader I didn’t expect the doctor to make the same mistake again. To sum up, in “Godfather Death 1812” by Jakob and Wilhmen Grimm, the doctor was giving a chance, but he did not take it and made the same mistake again. Therefore, the story is mostly about if you do not obey the rules, there will be consequences. However, using the 6 C’s the “Godfather Death 1812” became more understandable and made a lot of sense on what is the story is
about.
What episode or event best qualifies as the climax of the action? Does the climax resolve the central conflict (supposing there is one)? Are there conflicts left unresolved? Does the climax itself give rise to further conflicts? How is a central theme developed through the climax and the falling action of the story?
The flow and organization of the topics are structured chronologically and easy for readers to have a clear depiction of the progression of the book. He explains and elaborates his ideas and assumptions on struggles with morality, through real voices of patients and his own personal encounter. The first few topics were lighthearted, more on procedural terms such as the demographics of care in the United States and India and the evolution of care. This heightens to themes that are close to one’s heart as he uncovers the relationship amongst medicine, patient, and the family. It also deliberates on the concerns after medicine becomes impotent and society is ill-equipped for the aging population, which highlight the decisions and conversations one should or might have pertaining to death. He makes
The climax is illustrated and clarified through the symbolic tearing or exposing of the bare walls. She wants to free the woman within, yet ends up trading places, or becoming, that "other" woman completely. Her husband's reaction only serves as closure to her psychotic episode, forcing him into the unfortunate realization that she has been unwell this whole time.
Plot Structure – I felt that most of the exposition took place in the beginning of the first page. For the rest of the story there was mostly rising action. Then, I felt that the climax came when Julian sees his mother crumple to the ground. The falling action and resolution are packaged together in the last couple paragraphs.
doctor could have killed the fiend and rid himself of it forever, but he didn’t.
In order to appeal to today’s audience, Disney had to change aspects of the Grimm Brothers’ fairy tales to fit the audience’s modern day ideals. Any form of entertainment is written for a specific audience. The time period between when the Grimm Brothers were writing to now has seen many changes which alter the way stories are told. In the 1800s, when the Grimm Brothers wrote their fairy tales, people passed down stories through word of mouth. It was a simple time,”They continue to live in such a way that nobody ponders whether they are good or bad, poetic or crude… And they take pleasure in them without having any reason” (Grimm Brothers page xxvi). People absorbed what they heard which did not require reading deeply into each story. Each
I believe that the climax is on page 91 when Phoenix arrives at the town. "All right. The doctor said as long as you came to get it, you could have it." At this point I felt a huge sigh of relief because the conflict had officially been solved. Phoenix made a journey to get medicine that was necessary for her grandson and she finally got it! It is as though all of her hard work paid off in the end and as the reader I can feel the emotions of the elder woman.
I believe the reason that, 'The Godfather', is such a great film is because it lets audiences decide whether they like the characters or not. Too many movies made about organized crime begin with some seemingly random act of violence. 'The Godfather', however, lets it be known from the start to judge the characters in the film based on what type of person they are instead of the criminal activities they may engage in.
As the story begins, the unnamed doctor is introduced as one who appears to be strictly professional. “Aas often, in such cases, they weren’t telling me more than they had to, it was up to me to tell them; that’s why they were spending three dollars on me.” (par. 3) The doctor leaves the first impression that he is one that keeps his attention about the job and nothing out of the ordinary besides stating his impressions on the mother, father and the patient, Mathilda. Though he does manage to note that Mathilda has a fever. The doctor takes what he considers a “trial shot” and “point of departure” by inquiring what he suspects is a sore throat (par. 6). This point in the story, nothing remains out of the ordinary or questionable about the doctor’s methods, until the story further develops.
In a world little seen or heard of, the Godfather emerges as the universal symbol of organized crime for all of those who read or watch this tale. From killing Fanucci, a local extortionist, to becoming the most powerful Don in the United States, Vito Corleone’s rise to power is indeed spectacular. The book opens emphasizing the network of friends that Don Corleone has created, starting at the wedding where they have their meetings. After failed negotiations to save his godson Johnny’s movie career, the Don sends Luca Brasi to kill Jack Woltz’s prized $600,000 racehorse and place its head in his bed. This is an example of how the Don can exert his incredible power at will, and Jack Woltz decides to cast Johnny in his new movie. After his dad is almost killed, Michael realizes his destiny, and agrees to kill their enemy Sollozzo, which will start a vicious gang war. Sonny Corleone leads the family and coordinates brutal raids on the five enemy families that force them to back off. Later, Sonny is caught in a trap at a toll booth and shot repeatedly, and the Don returns to negotiate a truce. Next, the Don will finally succumb to death from a heart attack, and Michael Corleone will continue the business. Unexpectedly, Michael will kill many foes of his family and recover the lost prestige of the Corleone family. This novel propelled Mario Puzo onto the national stage; it was the fastest selling book of its time and the foundation for one of the greatest movies of all time. The lifestyle of the god-like Godfather becomes envied by all those who seek the freedom that this crime lord attains. In Mario Puzo's The Godfather, he depicts the theme of freedom to convey how individual's, particularly the Mafia's, involvement in cr...
Now let us just say that it was the husband on his deathbed, and his wife was the one out there trying to come up with these four thousand dollars. What exactly do you think she could have done differently to get the money? What exactly would this male doctor have made her do, to receive this cure for her husband? If she was the one out there begging and barrowing, do you think she would have, came up with more than two thousand dollars? Do you think if she was the breaking in and stealing, do you think they would have shown her some sort of sympathy? All of these actions falls right back into the ethics of care which also supports the virtue of
The main characters in this tragedy are: Duke of Venice, Brabantio (a senator), Gratiano (brother to Brabantio), Lodovico (kinsman to Brabantio), Othello (a noble Moor in the service of the Venetian state), Cassio (his lieutenant), Iago (his ancient), Roderigo (a Venetian gentleman), Montano (Othello’s predecessor in the government of Cyprus), Clown (servant to Othello), Desdemona (daughter to Brabantio and wife to Othello), Emilia (wife to Iago), Bianca (mistress to Cassio).
Six Characters in Search of an Author is a very disturbing, strange play. Although the ideal family is close knit and loving, the characters in this family are anything but loving towards each other, and show what any family’s worst nightmare could be. Pirandello uses the different forms of reality and unreality in the play to create confusion and disharmony. The characters, who are desperately in search of their purpose, to act out their miserable lives, are in a state of constant disharmony and contempt with each other and the actors. Their dilemma will never be resolved, because their own lives will be interpreted differently by others: the audience, as well as the actors who would portray them. The six characters will always live with the terrible pain of their written-out lives, which will follow them forever.
Identify the important turning points of the story. Which would be the climax, the point that determines the outcome?
First, let’s consider the reasoning behind the patients choosing to forego extraordinary treatment for their cancer. They have decided, as Beauchamp would put it, that refusing to prolong their lives in the face of pain and suffering “neither harms nor wrongs [them] and may provide a benefit” (Beauchamp, 76). They “intend to quit life because of its bleak possibilities” (Beauchamp, 77). The doctor readily complies with their wishes out of moral, legal, and professional obligation. A choice has been made to let both patients die, as a response to their “competent and authoritative refusal of treatment” (Beauchamp 74).