Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As I watched Ex Machina I found it quite intriguing in the sense that Ex Machina was rich with the story of creation. If it is read along those lines then the film could be viewed as an Abrahamic religion’s version of genesis and the retelling tale of Adam and Eve but with a twist. In this film Nathan serves the role of god, while his mansion and surroundings could be seen as heaven. Caleb’s character is brought over as the first man to witness the existence of Ava, whose name is a derivative of Eve. As Caleb attempts to help Ava escape from the mansion, he ends up disobeying Nathan. Just as Adam and Eve disobeyed god and ended up facing his wrath. Even though Ava is a robot she cannot help but question existence for example “ Why should I
If an author intends, then he/she could use certain names which could be meaningful to the story and the script. Coincidentally I discovered Ava, Caleb and Nathan are Biblical names. Evidently, Ava is meant to be a type of name which is synonymous to Eve - a new creation made in the image of her maker - Caleb which is also has rich Biblical meaning. In Scripture, Caleb was a Hebrew spy commissioned by Moses to scope out Canaan, where as in Ex Machina we see Caleb was sent to scope out Ava. Lastly, Nathan is a prophet in the Bible who reprimands and sets King David aright after his act of adultery with Bathsheba. Just like Eve’s fall in Genesis , we witness Ava’s fall. However, it is not the same in nature to Eve’s which was distrust and disobedience in her creator. Both Ava and Eve desire to be like their creator but the only difference is that Ava’s creator is a human being whereas Eve’s creator is the one and only God. However, both are not prepared to grasp for what is not theirs. By that I mean that Ava escaping and living as an “average human” could be problematic for her since she is not a living being, she would need to recharge her battery, her behaviour and etc would definitely throw her game
East of Eden was a novel that explored the roots of evil in its most primal form. Through intricate plot lines and complex characters, John Steinbeck weaved a tale of brutality, cruelty, and isolation. One important character that helped to illustrate the presence of evil throughout the book was Cathy Ames, an intelligent woman who ruthlessly used other people to serve her own needs. When reflecting upon East of Eden, a debate that often surfaces is whether Cathy's evil was a result of nature or nurture. Arguments for and against both sides are in the book. At some times, Cathy is portrayed as a wicked fiend who's aggression stems from nowhere but her own empty heart. Other times, Cathy appears weak and afraid of people who aren't the least bit intimidating. Those are the moments in the book where one must question whether Cathy is truly evil, or just an impatient and self-centered individual.
The idea that man's relationship with good and evil is not predestined is a central idea in this novel. The conflict between good and evil is a universal battle. Many characters in the novel, East of Eden, struggle both internally and externally with Good versus evil.
Symbolism is very prominent over the course of this story, giving it that much more meaning. Knowles makes not only one, but several instances to religious principles and more precisely in this case, Adam and Eve. These of jealousy, greed, and selfishness are prominent throughout both stories as well is a significant fall whether it would be as monstrous as humanity or on the smaller scale of relationships. The disruption of peace and harmony are also evident in the two. In addition, it is interesting how the author finds a way to tie them all into each other.
The novel East of Eden by John Steinbeck is an allegory to the biblical story of Cain and Abel, and many of its characters become embodiments of both good and evil. As they struggle to overcome what has been decided for them they are taught they hold the power to overcome and rise above their destiny’s. When the Hebrew idea of “timshel” is introduced to the allegory of Cain and Abel, it become apparent that whether life is predestined or not; mankind holds the ultimate ability of deciding what will become of himself. Adam’s choice to move on from Cathy, Cal’s decision to forgive himself, and Cathy’s decision to let evil overcome her prove that overcoming what is predestined for one lies in the hands of the individual.
...ality and Liberty gave each other names that reminded them of each other from the books that they’ve read because, Equality says that it isn’t proper for men to not have a name. That is how they got the name Prometheus and Gaea.
Steinbeck uses the biblical story of Cain and Abel in East of Eden to show us that we do not have set fate. Steinbeck uses the Hebrew word “timshel”, which means “thou mayest”, to suggest that man has the ability to choose good or evil. “Timshel” affects the characters in East of Eden such as Cal and Aron and their choice of overcoming good or evil. Steinbeck sees this novel as his most important work, and he uses it as a way to state his personal ideas concerning mankind:“The free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual.”(Steinbeck,132). Steinbeck shows God has given humans free will and their ability to choose good or evil, if they so decide. He portrays the “C” characters to be connected to Cain, such as Charles and Cal and the “A” characters to be connected to Abel, such as Aron and Adam.
The Enuma Elish mirrors the subordinate disordered lives of the Babylonians that created it. Genesis mirrors the newfound freedom and idealism of the Jewish people who created it after years of oppression. These two writings contrast the differences between the ancient Babylonians and the ancient Hebrews. Creation stories give great insight into the lives of the people who created them.
People have turned to God amidst suffering for thousands of years. Even today, it is quite common to hear that someone will be “prayed for” during times of hardship or struggle. Despite all of this, most people struggle when confronted with the image of God in suffering. People see God as a transcendent being who wields complete control yet allows heinous acts to occur. This false image of God can confuse people and create an enmity between them and God. However, people must understand that God is powerless in suffering. Although He cannot do anything to prevent suffering, God is omnipresent in suffering, giving people opportunities to show things such as love, empathy, or compassion.
The Book of Job shows a change in God's attitude from the beginning to the end. At the beginning of the book, He is presented as Job's protector and defender. At the end He appears as the supreme being lecturing and preaching to Job with hostility, despite the fact that Job never cursed his name, and never did anything wrong. Job's only question was why God had beseeched this terrible disease on him. I intend to analyze and discuss the different roles God played in the Book of Job.
Throughout the Bible God can be represented in a number of different ways. In some chapters of the Bible God can be found to be a compassionate, loving God, who would do anything for his people. To contradict this, in other chapters of the Bible God can be found trying to instill fear into people so that they believe in him, or do what he wants of them. In both instances it shows how different God can be seen and why believers can have doubts about how God really is.
These explanations above, apparently, do not give explanations of the problem of natural disasters. Why there are tornadoes, epidemics, hurricanes, tsunamis, and earthquakes happen in our world? These evils cannot be explained by free will of creatures. Because of these natural disasters many innocent people die or lose their families and friends. How can natural evil be explained and what is the reason behind it? Moral evil is explained through the concept of free will, but we cannot do the same with natural evil. Therefore, there is a problem: God is the one who is responsible for the natural evil, and, as a result he is also responsible for death and suffering of innocent people. (Geisler, 2011)
Rappichini’s Daughter can be interpreted as a retelling of the Creation story. Since this is the case, Giovanni could be Adam, and the garden would be the Garden of Eden. Hawthorne flips the script though, and tells the story of Adam overcoming temptation. Hawthorne also plays with the story, making the devil the creator and God the one trying to thwart the devil’s plans. He also takes the apple out of the equation completely and makes Eve the temptation.
In the creation account, on the sixth day, after God had made all other things concerning earth, He has made mankind. We are a very special creation, “Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness. They will rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, the livestock, all the earth, and the creatures that crawl on the earth.” So God created man in His own image; He created him in the image of God; He created them male and female (Genesis 1:26-27 HCSB). We are the only creation God”…breathed the breath of life into… (Genesis 2:7 HCSB). These things are unique to us, we are made in the image of God, this places a responsibility on me to consider all men as God does, He pours out His love, sent His Son to be our atonement, and His Son has called us to be shepherds of His flock. As pastors we are to not only care for and tend to the ninety-nine, we are to find the one which is lost, because as Jesus states, Heaven rejoices when the one lost person repents (Luke 15:3-7).
can see how unlikely it is that the Demon exists and then can see that the
Previous literary schools, such as the Renaissance writers and Romanticism, depicted God as an extremely powerful, but benevolent deity that ensured that the conclusion to most events turned out in a positive fashion. After World War I’s catastrophic cost in lives, souls, and property, many authors and poets changed their views of God. Instead of a loving, all-powerful force for good, God turned into a cruel, supernatural being that chooses not to intervene when humans suffer. Many modernists felt that if God could not prevent a disaster such as World War I, he either looked passively at humans or even assisted in their abilities to destroy fellow men, women, and children. Authors such as T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, and Ernest Hemingway described God in this manner, especially during their European expatriate periods. Since God gave humans, the power to be cruel, God must also possess a cruel side to his image.