Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
General Motors ignition switch scandal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: General Motors ignition switch scandal
A.) An example of corporate crime is when General Motors (GM) hid the fact that some of their cars contained faulty ignition switches that could shut off the car while it was being driven, disabling the airbag, power steering and power brake. This ignition-switch defect was tied to at least 124 deaths. In 2015, the corporation admitted that their employees knew about this problem a decade before they sent out recalls, which is the basis for the charges.
B.) The four characteristics of corporate crimes are applicable to this example.
None of the GM executives are being charged individually in this case. Although criminal charges against the corporation were issued regarding the faulty ignition switches, GM also settled a civil class action suit
…show more content…
involving nearly 1,400 cases of death or serious injuries around the same time. This case involved other recalls as well. General Motors CEO Mary Barra showed remorse for the company’s actions by telling employees that "People were hurt and people died in our cars." She made it clear that GM had taken responsibility for the deaths of their customers, but since she made no effort to step down, it is safe to say that she does not believe she is to blame.
The families of those who were injured or killed in car accidents are willing to be compensated a total of $600 million instead of suing GM executives.
I had no idea that GM had committed a corporate crime until I started researching this topic. Even though people died because GM hid information, it was not headlined in the news, leading me to believe that the public did not take interest in this case.
C.) The victims were those who were injured or killed while driving cars manufactured by General Motors that contained faulty ignition switches. The families of these people would also be considered victims as well.
D.) A car accident caused the victims to be injured or lose their lives. Their car shut off while it was being driven due to an ignition-switch defect, which would disable the airbag, power steering and power brake. Without these functions, the car became much more
dangerous. E.) The corporation had to pay a $900 million fine to settle the charges and they were given three-years probation by the Justice Department. GM also had to hire someone to monitor their recall process to ensure they comply with federal safety reporting regulations. Also, the company has agreed to pay the maximum possible fine of $35 million to settle civil charges with federal safety regulators. F.) I do not think the punishment was severe enough. According to an article by Drew Harwell from The Washington Post, the $900 million fine was less than a third of GM’s annual profit. Corporations that knowingly put people’s lives in danger should be fined so heavily that they go into bankruptcy. Also, withholding this piece of information cost over 100 lives, and not a single executive of the company will serve time in jail. Criminal charges need to be brought against the heads of companies who commit corporate crimes.
While the widely exposed and discussed trials of WorldCom's and Tyco's top executives were all over the media, one of the most interesting cases of securities fraud was happening without any public acknowledgement.
2 Companies are exposed to crimes either from the inside, or the outside. White-collar crime is a complication; harming companies in our society, which costs millions. An example of a white-collar crime would be the Ford Pinto case. When gas prices were rising in the United States, people started to search for economical cars.
The first thing that one needs to consider is the situation that victims are normally under. No one chooses to be in an accident, it is something that is unexpected. Because of that those who are affected are often not at a point financially where they can handle the results of the accident such as lost time at work, medical bills, and other associated cost. Worsening the situation is the fact that the injuring party in the accident often does not want to compensate the victims for their actions. This results in an even
There are numerous facts about this case that will be legally significant. The facts about the accident would include:
The case study, `Will GM 's Strategic Plan Lead to Success,` is about how the company General Motors Co. Plans to overcome financial deficits, ensure growth within the company, and remain competitive in the automotive industry. To help with overcoming financial deficits, GM was apart of the bailout, which assisted GM in relieving themselves of almost $40 billion dollars of debt. This restructuring gave GM an advantage over other automakers. Most other automotive businesses, that did not participate in the bailout, still have billions of dollars of debt they must repay in addition to competing with its adversaries.(Kinicki & Williams, 2013). GM made many cutbacks to ensure growth within the company. The reduced the amount models that are in production. They have recognized that some changes need to be implemented with global production in order to remain ahead.
As a result, GM’s developer Edward Cole was well aware of the major design defect of the excessive weight in the rear causing General Motors to face 106 Corvair liability lawsuits involving injuries and death. After the publication of Nader’s book General Motors hired a private detective in New York to gather information and discredit Nader. Nader sued General Motors for invasion of privacy winning millions in the lawsuit. Furthermore, CEO James Roche promoted Edward Cole the Corvair design engineer in question, to GM’s President. Did the CEO Roche of General Motors make a sound ethical decision with the promotion?
Corporate executives like Kenneth Lay and Martha Stewart were taken before the court for poor ethical practices. Leaders of pharmaceutical companies have been found knowing about distribution of unsafe products. Leaders at Coke Cola were found guilty of racial discrimination and leaders of cruise ships fined for dumping waste in the ocean. News reports exposed Wall Street analysts who created phony reports, made profits, and pushing worthless stocks, left citizens questioning if they should invest their money. Leaders of the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, were cited for practices of employee abuses and gender discrimination.
The responsible party for her injuries is the company. This being in accordance with the vicarious liability laws. This is because, Sitters has insurance on the vehicles and on the other hand Allens maintain insurance on their personal vehicles. Therefore, Sitters has no responsibility according to the vacarious liability laws. Moreover, it is evident that the doctrine of vicarious liability imputes the wrongful conduct of a tortfeasor to a third person who is considered to be responsible for the tortfeasor’s actions. This responsibility arises out of a special relationship, e.g, in employment relationships, family relationships
As I explored the internet for articles on unethical organizations, it is not hard to find a long list of examples. Tyco International captured my interest the most since I saw their name mentioned numerous times in articles, and Air Products utilizes the company as a vendor in Asia. Tyco was ranked number five on The Richiest.com website’s top ten corporate scandal list. In addition, a few other familiar companies listed included BP Oil, Xerox, WorldCom, and, of course, Enron as number one.
accusations, Google says it will not end here but that it might effect other companies
Corporate crime is extremely difficult to detect for many reasons. One major reason is that many people do not realise a crime is being committed as corporate crime is often seen as a victimless crime. At face value this may seem to be the case but if you look deeper you will see that this is not true. Every year the FBI estimates that 19,000 Americans are murdered every year compared with the 56,000 Americans who die every year from occupational disease such as black lung and asbestosis (Russell Mokhiber 2000). Deaths Caused by corporate crime are also very indirect so it can be very difficult to trace the problem to the corporation.
Volkswagen, a well-known German automaker, has continuously been highly regarded for their commitment to producing safe, reliable, and relatively inexpensive vehicles. However, the Volkswagen emissions scandal dramatically changed the world’s perception of the highly rated company. The vastly publicized scandal included the company fraudulently deceiving the United States government in regards to the compliance with pollution emission standards. Volkswagen should be held responsible for the legal, spiritual, and ethical
Since the probe, General Motors had created a new post that is charged with responsibility for vehicle safety (Muller, 2013). General Motors terminated sixteen people for their role in not repairing the faulty ignition switch. The mindset throughout General Motors was to retain the bad news and keep it apart from senior supervisors. This was undeviatingly contributed to no effort being taken to remedy the faulty switch. Because of this, General Motors is directly accountable for the graves of 13
Another catastrophic outcome of car accident can be a major injury or trauma. A person might be able to survive after a...
That is why the media never covers anything like this. We all know that they really don't care about. anything else except for hot topics. The truth really does not mean anything. to them. This we notice in all the cases that the media jumps to wrongful conclusions, such as the Richard Jewel case, the Olympic bombing and the TWA.