Globalization Social Justice

1773 Words4 Pages

Corporations around the world have now set up their production process in different countries around the world, different components of products are produced in different countries and then the final version of product in a different country while the original company originates from a different place. AS now corporations are no longer limited to producing within their home countries they now either directly or indirectly through contractors, employ people around the world in all aspects of production and distribution. In this context, labor is flexible in that a corporation can draw from an entire globe’s worth of workers, and can relocate production to areas where labor is much cheaper or more skilled. Wealth now held by many corporations …show more content…

Elite group of 1% control everything. Stiglitz says that people who work on wall street then work for the government and then again go back to wall street, therefore their interests are not aligned with the people but the industry mind-set that controls them. There is also another debate surrounding this topic 'social justice' in globalization. First of all let's consider that do core states in today's world owe a moral duty towards the poorer and weaker states. Well certainly no one can impose any sort of moral obligation on any state and enforce any decision. According to Pogge the western powers do owe a moral duty as the world economic system is in the position it is because of the policies of strong countries in the west thus holding them responsible. The weak country has been affected by the selfish western economic policy. Pogge believes that the problem is not globalization or free trade but it’s a political one because of lack of equal power sharing and lack of democratic power sharing by all the parties involved. Pogge’s institutional understanding of human rights governments and individuals have a duty to work for an institutional order and public interest that ensure that all members of society have secure access to the objects of their human rights. In my opinion Pogge's opinion on institutional reforms and moral obligation is …show more content…

Some of his suggestion are just not doable in today's world in my opinion. But I do agree with pogge to the extent that is all about giving a strong and fair system. If the system is fair and right human right or any sort of violation will never happen. And as we see big states or big corporation do make more money by having their products being processed at different countries mainly due to cheap labor. Because of this these top-level corporation make extra money and as we find in Rodrik's work that poor countries are poor because their labor is not paid as it should be they barely make money to get through their day let alone spend on education and health. This fact does put a serious moral obligation on the western core powers to help poor countries from which they are making crazy profits because of cheap

Open Document