Gionfriddo V. Major League Baseball Case Summary

1852 Words4 Pages

In recent years, there have been many law cases that have influenced the world of sports. One case that had a direct impact on the sport of baseball was a case called Gionfriddo vs. Major League Baseball. In 2001, four former Major League Baseball players who played in the Major leagues between 1932 and 1948, Pete Coscarart, Dolph Camilli, Frankie Crosetti, and Al Gionfriddo filed suit against Major League Baseball (MLB), for violating their common law and statutory right of publicity by publishing data, statistics, photographs and video depictions of the players without their permission or compensation. This information was made available publicly through MLB’s website. The purpose of this case was to determine whether the published information constituted “commercial speech” under the First Amendment, entitling it to a reduced level …show more content…

According to (Right to Publicity and Copyright of Statistics, 2005) the "right" to publicity is more of a merge of rights which have now been widely accepted. Specifically, with regard to baseball, the right to publicity initiated from Haelan Labs v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., where it was determined that a person has a right to their photograph and the publicity value of their photograph (Right to Publicity and Copyright of Statistics, 2005). The Supreme Court assumed the right to publicity as an independent legal right in 1977. Currently, the right has been reduced to writing in the Restatement of Unfair Competition and states have adopted the right to different circumstances. Section 46 of the Restatement of the Law Third, Unfair Competition, states in applicable part: "One who appropriates the commercial value of a person's identity by using without consent the person's name, likeness, or other indicia of identity for purposes of trade is subject to liability for the relief

Open Document