Ginsberg's Howl: Transforming the Perception of Obscenity

1306 Words3 Pages

The banning of books on the grounds of obscenity was not an uncommon practice. Countless works of literature were banned for having mention of sexually explicit language or a sexual act, even though the work as a whole did not intend to serve this purpose. Disagreements arose from this premise and there was a lack of clarity as to what dictated obscenity and who decided what is suitable for the public to read. Other legal matters such as the rights protected under the First Amendment were questioned. When the writing of Allen Ginsberg’s poem Howl was brought to court, it changed the perception of obscenity in literature.
Ginsberg’s first reciting of his poem Howl at the Six Gallery reading in San Francisco was met with praise and applause. …show more content…

Mark Schorer, an English professor at the University of California, was called to be a witness for the defense. During a cross-examination, McIntosh attacked the use of language in the poem, questioning the necessity of offensive words. Schorer stated that Ginsberg attempted to interpret his human experience through Howl, and the use of “offensive” words were necessary to effectively portray the author’s view (Rehlaender, 2015). Another witness, book editor Luther Nichols, confirmed Schorer’s statement about the relevance of the wording, stating Ginsberg is “employing the language that is actually in reality used” (Ferlinghetti, 1961). Schorer, Nichols, and the other witnesses provided a strong case for the defense by upholding their beliefs of Howl to possess literary merit and the overall contribution of obscene words to the work as a whole (Rehlaender, …show more content…

The first U.S. obscenity case involving a book was Fanny Hill: Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, by John Cleland. Charges were filed against the publisher, Peter Holmes, in 1749, on account of corrupting the youth. Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman, Ulysses by James Joyce, and Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller were a few more works that were banned on account of obscenity (Morgan & Peters, 2006). The legal influence of the “Howl” trial was evident when many books were liberated from their sexually explicit charges. Had the verdict been decided another way, the public would have lost multiple other works of literature to sexual explicitness. More cases of obscenity would have ensued and countless books would have been confiscated. The result of the trial absolved future cases and works like Fanny Hill: Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure and Tropic of Cancer were unbanned and cleared of their charges. Tropic of Cancer had been recently brought to trial in 1953 after being banned in 1934, but the charges were not dropped until 1961, after the Howl trial. Thanks to the victory of Howl, a serious work of literature could no longer be bound by minor sexual implications if it possessed themes of social importance (Rehlaender, 2015). Previously banned literature found its place on the shelves of America once

Open Document