Azra Sabovic
Final Draft
There are two main characters, Gilgamesh and Agamemnon, who share some of the same values, while contradicting in others. Gilgamesh, as two-thirds a god and one-third a men, has taken upon journey in look for the eternal life, wile fighting with his conscience. Agamemnon, commander-in-chief of the Greek army, attacked Troy with the motif of revenge for his brothers honor, having different conscience and laws around him, which developed certain actions.
Initially in the story, Gilgamesh is living the life as a God. He is famous among the people for being powerful and no one could ever stand up to him. The people are also grateful that Gilgamesh is the one "who opened passes through mountains; and who dug deep walls
…show more content…
on the mountainsides;" (Ferry 4). Although Gilgamesh is living his life the way he wants it, there was a part missing: he was not eternal. Gilgamesh did not feel completely powerful and satisfied if he did not have eternal life, which would bring him fame.
This is strengthen after seeing his best friend dying with a "worm drop out of Enkidu's nose" (Ferry 63), which brought motivation to searching for eternity. Additionally, Gilgamesh wanted to go to a quest because he enjoyed the fame he had in the city, and feeling powerful over everyone else, "It is Gilgamesh who will venture into the Forest, and cut the Cedar down and win the glory" (Ferry 17). Besides, even if Gilgamesh falls, his fame is guaranteed, "If I should fall, my fame will be secured" (Ferry 17). This proves that Gilgamesh did not care if he would die, as long as his name stays imprinted in peoples mind, or better yet, history. Although he has built the city providing to people a …show more content…
place to live, he has done acts which he cannot be proud with, such as molesting women, sacrificing warriors, where no one could ever stand up to him. People were very disappointment arguing that he is not a guardian he is supposed to be, "Is this the sheppard of the people?" (Ferry 5). This makes us wonder if Gilgamesh is justified for his actions. In spite of the benefits he has provided for the city, Gilgamesh has used his power in a wrong way, and caused suffering to his people. Taking into consideration the power he owns, does that power allows him to step over the expectations of people, and do what he pleases just because no human could never compete with him? The answer is no, since people have taken the initiative to complain, and the gods have decided to challenge him. Challenging Gilgamesh by another human would be hard, and citizens of Uruk knew that. They have come up with a smart solution presenting it to the Gods. They have asked God Arura, the same god who made Gilgamesh, to make another one who could challenge Gilgamesh, "Let stormy heart contend with stormy heart that peace may come to Uruk once again." (Ferry 5). However, little did the citizens of Uruk know that Gilgamesh would become best friends with Enkidu. It is strange that, despite the fact Enkidu did not challenge Gilgamesh until later, the citizens for whom Gilgamesh thought could not do anything to him, challenged him by making the gods listen, "Aruru listened and heard" (Ferry 5). In this way, the hunter also challenged him, by contributing to Enkidu going after Gilgamesh. Once Enkidu died, Gilgamesh experienced deep grief after a friend. Loosing Enkidu was not easy for him, which affected his feelings. Prevalent repetition emphasized his sorrow throughout the text, reminding us of the soft side Gilgamesh possessed,"Two people,companions, they can prevail together against the terror" (Ferry 26). Although heartbreaking, this has strengthen Gilgamesh's motif of keep going further into his mission, where he barely continued without his friend. Furthermore, if Gilgamesh did not continue without Enkidu, he would never know that he is not able to be eternal. Finding this to be true, Enkidu has dominated over Gilgamesh's beliefs, and conscience. Initially, Gilgamesh was satisfied with the rule that he is a bigger authority than citizens of Uruk, and they owe him everything, but after having the plant which would give him eternity, he wanted to bring it back and share it with the old people of Uruk. Instead of being selfish, as in the beginning, Gilgamesh has grew and changed. People's actions and Enkidu's death have touched Gilgamesh's mind and changed the way he was thinking, taking him to the path of being selfless. Additionally, the Gods have put him to this quest, and made Enkidu the one to die. Gods power has always exceeded Gilgamesh's authority and he was always challenged by them. On the other side, Agamemnon has different motifs for going on his journey, which ended up being a Trojan War, lasting ten years. Paris, the son of Priam, has gone into Agamemnon's brothers house, Menelaus. Paris was treated like a royal, but he fell in love with Menelaus's wife, Helen. Kidnapping her, Menelaus was furious and dishonored. As a King, Agamemnon wanted to bring back the honor to his brother, and to his family, which is why he sailed off to Troy. The fact that Agamemnon was ready to take his army to Troy, and fight for a single women, shows that he was a good King and brother, ready to help. But, it also shows how he has no morality towards his people and unity, because he would sacrifice so many lives for one women. Yet, soldiers agreed to fight, showing their respect and standing by King. When it comes to being a hero, one would think Gilgamesh is antihero.
Gilgamesh's decision on going to quest affected a wild man Enkidu. In their trip, Enkidu followed him and encouraged him to not be scared of all the creatures that have gotten in his way. Gilgamesh, although strong, was scared in the fights against the demon Huwawa, and Bull of Heaven. He would cry and hide himself, sometimes even weep. In each situation, instead of being like Gilgamesh, Enkidu had quick mind and knew what he had to do, which is show Gilgamesh he was not alone, "Two people, companions, they can prevail together against the terror" (Ferry 26). This is showing that Enkidu had more bravery than Gilgamesh, and although not his quest, did not run away from the challenges. Furthermore, when the Gods were deciding who to punish for the deeds, they have chosen Enkidu, where Gilgamesh had nothing to say in order to save him. The sun God Shamash has tried to save him because Enkidu was compressed into this trip. Initially, the mother of Gilgamesh Rimat-Ninsun, just before the trip has hit the biggest weakness of Enkidu, "Enkidu has neither father nor mother;" (Ferry 13). This proves the fact that Enkidu had no choice but to feel worthless and, therefore, go to this dangerous trip. He just accepted the guilt of Enkidu as if it was fair. This is unfair because these were Gilgamesh's quests, and he was just following his wishes. Although there is a prevalent repetition of how Gilgamesh suffers for his
friend, keeping our minds on the regret Gilgamesh has, it is still not enough to think it wasn't his fault for Enkidu's death. Enkidu died for something Gilgamesh wanted, while Agamemnon died because he wanted to protect his brother and his country. While Gilgamesh is an antihero, Agamemnon proved himself as a true tragedy hero. Accepting the challenge of going in war to honor his brother, Agamemnon put on his back ten years of war. Being sent by Zeus, we can see Agamemnon and his brother Menelaus with great powers,"two kings with the power of Zeus" (Aeschylus 105). While sailing, there was a big decision brought up to Agamemnon. The goddess of winds Artemis has requested a sacrifice of Agamemnons daughter Iphigenia, "blood of a young girl streaks the altar" (Aeschylus 110). There was a huge decision to be brought by Agamemnon. Whether to follow his heart, the law of divine justice or his conscience? Although it was Agamemnon's mistake for the anger of the God Artemis, the punishment of killing his daughter Iphigenia would take a man with strong heart to do. Agamemnon has had many thinking and deciding, which had to happen fast. Whether to follow the law or his heart, "Obey, obey, or a heavy doom will crush me!" (Aeschylus 110). This indicates that if he does not follow the law the Gods are giving him, he will be condemned into destruction. This, also, puts on line his army, and his victory in all. He would not be able to accomplish what he wants to, defeat Troy, and he wouldn't go home defeated, but destroyed. There was the only question that really remained: Whether to sacrifice Troy or his daughter's life,and all that for law? He knew that the divine power could ruin everything he planned, and he had to make a choice. Furthermore, Agamemnon is a father, and has love for his daughter. He knows that he will get punished, in whatever he decides to do, "Oh but doom will crush me once i rend my child, the glory of my house-" (Aeschylus 110). He is having a breakdown in his conscience, what is right and what is wrong? How to live with his hands stained from his daughters blood? How to be strong enough and kill his innocent daughter, especially for his actions? These questions have been going through his head, making this decision unbearable. However, after questioning himself and not being sure if he shall feed the fury of Gods, he realizes that the law is one, and he would have to sacrifice his daughter, "- feed their fury!- Law is law-" (Aeschylus 110). Agamemnon has recognized a path of what's right, in his opinion, and what goes with his mind, instead of heart. In both Epic of Gilgamesh and Agamemnon, Gods have important role. In Gilgamesh, God of Sun Shamash is aiding to Enkidu and Gilgamesh while going through the quest. When the decision is about to be made, Shamash is also trying to spare Enkidu, considering the fact he was only a follower, but the Gods did not change it. In Gilgamesh, they are the ones who are setting the new challenges for Gilgamesh, first Enkidu, then Huwawa, and at the end eternal life quest, which he fails. In Agamemnon, Zeus is one of the most important Gods. According to the chorus, Zeus is "the cause of all, the one who works it all." (Aeschylus 165). Does this mean that it is Zeus fault for the tragedy made in Agamemnons family? This can also relate to Gilgamesh, if it is Zeus's fault that Enkidu died and Gilgamesh did not get his eternity? Although unknown, one can believe that the Gods were making the webs of destiny. Furthermore, in both stories we can see the women's role. In Gilgamesh, his prostitute seduces Enkidu, and brings him to human habits and values. She is the reason why Enkidu leaves his wild life, and joins humans. At the end of Gilgamesh, Enkidu is cursing her because she has brought him to death. The same thing happens to Agamemnon. Helen is sent by Zeus, seduces Paris, and gets in fight two Empires: Greek and Troy. Not only she brings conflict, she also makes Troy lose war, people, and their land. The women are a big part of this stories because they are also making decisions which affect the destiny. Same with Clytemnestra. She is angry of her husband leaving for ten years and leaving the city on her back, and killing her daughter has put even more anger on her back. She has had so much anger in herself, that she demanded her lover to kill the king, so they can both rule, "Act for act, wound for wound!" (Aeschylus 166). She has followed her own scheme in revenging her daughter, but also the loneliness she felt for years. In a conclusion, these two characters are somewhat similar. Gilgamesh did not get his eternity, and Agamemnon is murdered, trying to satisfy his country. both of the endings are, in a way not satisfying as expected, but at least the characters clashed together at some pints. These two tragic stories are so astonishing, that are still in the world today being read multiple times.
Often, literature is based on several heroes and their adventures. Most especially, the epic stories symbolize different countries, nations, and cultures. The authors usually shape the characteristics of these stars and profile their unique techniques of writing as well as their imaginative power. Gilgamesh is one of the most known heroes, whose character was developed in the famous “Epic of Gilgamesh” as the strongest of men, a fair judge, a brave warrior, and an ambitious builder who built the magnificent walls of Uruk to protect its people. On the other hand, there are some undesirable characteristics that he possesses such as selfishness, and arrogance mostly brought about by the fact that he is part human and part god. He is characterized
The main character in the book The Epic of Gilgamesh, is Gilgamesh himself. In the beginning of the book one realizes that Gilgamesh is an arrogant person. Gilgamesh is full of himself and abuses his rights as king. He has sexual intercourse with the virgins of his town and acts as though he is a god. Throughout the story, many things cause Gilgamesh to change. He gains a friend, he makes a name for himself by killing Humbaba, and he tries to become immortal because of the death of Enkidu. Through these main actions his personality changes and he becomes a better person.
While Gilgamesh was a hero thought to be more beautiful, more courageous, more terrifying than all of the people of Uruk. Even though his desires, attributes, and accomplishments were just as there’s, he was still mortal.
The story of Gilgamesh seems to be a collection of trials and tribulation. Throughout the book, you watch characters battle demons with each other, as well as within themselves. The tantalizing temptations that fill each character, ultimately leads to destruction and death. One example was the relationship between Ishtar and Gilgamesh. Both characters display a type of arrogant, 'ego-consciousness' (Neumann 63) that inevitably leads to subversive fate.
Gilgamesh is an epic of great love, followed by lingering grief that causes a significant change in character. It is the story of a person who is feared and honored, a person who loves and hates, a person who wins and loses and a person who lives life. Gilgamesh's journey is larger than life, yet ends so commonly with death. Through Gilgamesh, the fate of mankind is revealed, and the inevitable factor of change is expressed.
In the Epic of Gilgamesh it states this, “...Enkidu dies. For the first time, Gilgamesh is faced with a situation he cannot control. He also experiences, for the first time, the human emotions of grief and fear…” this portrays it was because of Enkidu’s death that Gilgamesh came to meet grief and fear; feelings he had not yet known before because he had always won, and got everything he had wanted. Another example of this is when he was talking to Siduri and exclaims, “...Enkidu my brother, whom I loved, the end of mortality has overtaken him. I wept for him seven days and nights till the worm fastened on him. Because of my brother I am afraid of death, because of my brother I stray through the wilderness and cannot rest…” Both
The Epic of Gilgamesh is the greatest text of Mesopotamia and one of the earliest pieces of world literature. Gilgamesh quest for immortality explores human concerns about death, friendship, nature, civilization, power, violence, travel adventures, homecoming, love and sexuality. (pg. 95) “The Gilgamesh of the epic is an awe-inspiring, sparkling hero, but at first also the epitome of a bad ruler: arrogant, oppressive, and brutal.” (pg.96) Gilgamesh is 2/3 god because of his superhuman strength and endurance; he is 1/3 human because of his mortality. His epitome of a bad ruler will cause the gods to give consequences to his actions.
part of the story. Gilgamesh appears very impressive because of his great size and stately
In the epic of Gilgamesh, there are many complex characters. Every character involved in the story has their own personality and traits.
Gilgamesh was two thirds of a god who possessed beauty, a gorgeous body, and great amounts of courage and strength that surpassed all other humans. His greatness was established through the wonderful walls he built around Uruk, a rampart, and a temple for Anu and Ishtar (Gilgamesh & Sandars, 61). Enkidu on the other hand was initially an uncivilized man created by the goddess of creation, Aruru. His appearance was strictly barbaric with his long hair and hairy body, whose innocent mind knew nothing of a civilized human culture (Gilgamesh et al., 62). He ate grass and lived among the other animals in the woods until a trapper spotted him while trying to catch his game and noted to his father that he “was the strongest man in the world [and] is like an immortal from heaven” (Gilgamesh et al., 62). The trapper indicated his feeling of inferiority to Enkidu in the woods as he says he is afraid of him. One could say that Enkidu rules the woods of the uncivilized just as Gilgamesh rules over the city of Uruk; over the civilized. Both men are characterized as powerful, strong men in their domain yet Gilgamesh is in fact stronger and more powerful than his brother, Enkidu whom he calls his servant, fore he is the king of Uruk and is two thirds god. Enkidu also dies halfway through the adventure the two have while Gilgamesh, who is afraid of death, goes on to find a way to live immortally. Though inferior to his king brother, Enkidu completes the other half of Gilgamesh: while Gilgamesh knows the ins and outs of the city he rules, he is not familiar with the woods or nature in the ways that Enkidu is. Though they are different from each other, they both hold parallels with one another by bringing out the best in each other, thus reasonabl...
Gilgamesh, feeling the fear of his own mortality, sets out on a journey to search for a way to preserve himself. Although the journey that he endures is much larger than life, Gilgamesh comes to realize that he can never achieve immortality. Before the creation of Enkidu, Gilgamesh is a man without an equal match. He is an individual with overwhelming power, and it is because of this that makes Gilgamesh a very arrogant person.
Gilgamesh is known for his strong friendship with Enkidu. When Enkidu passed, it was as if his entire world fell apart because now he too was looking mortality in the face and he was scared. “How can I rest, how can I be at peace? What my brother is that shall I be when I’m dead.” It was hard to confront the future of his own demise without Enkidu, but when Gilgamesh conquered that inner fear it made him stronger. Much like a flower bud trying to bloom it must too encounter the harsh elements of nature but when it survives it will be stronger than
There once lived a king, the great king of Uruk in Mesopotamia. This great leader was Gilgamesh. His preserved epic is of great significance to modern day culture. Through Gilgamesh, the fate of mankind is revealed, and the inevitable factor of change is expressed. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, it is a great love, followed by a lingering grief that cause a significant change in the character of Gilgamesh.
In the epic poem Gilgamesh, King Gilgamesh goes on a humbling journey that helps him develop his flawed character. Gilgamesh develops a homosocial relationship as he travels alongside Enkidu. However, after Enkidu’s passing, he grows a fear of death, and goes on another quest seeking the answer to immortality. Gilgamesh’s desire for immortality quickly becomes more of an obsession once he realizes he is still human. Through the use of repetition and imagery, the poem shows that Gilgamesh’s need to be remembered soon becomes less of an obsession, as he begins to accept that he is a mortal but finds a legacy to leave behind through his city, Uruk.
The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey both are held in high respect by literature analysts and historians alike for the characterization of the hero and his companion, the imagery brought to mind when one of them is read, and the impressive length in relation to the time period it was written in. The similarities that these two epics share do not end with only those three; in fact, the comparability of these works extend to even the information on the author and the archetypes used. However, The Odyssey and The Epic of Gilgamesh contrast from one another in their writing styles, character details, and main ideas. Both epics weave together a story of a lost man who must find his way, but the path of their stories contrast from one another.