Gilgamesh And Oedipus Comparison

1546 Words4 Pages

Gilgamesh, Oedipus, and the Quest for Self-Identity No two literary characters are alike in the way they talk, they act, they think, or the way they deal with their problems. However in some way every character has a little similarity with the other character. Oedipus of Sophocles’ “Oedipus the King” and Gilgamesh of the narrator’s “The Epic of Gilgamesh, as characters have many things in common; they are both from a royal background and kings, and they both go through a mental transformation on their quest to inner discoveries of themselves which make them wiser as human. Oedipus is an ordinary man, a tragic hero and he is a great king to his subjects as he put their needs before everything else. While Gilgamesh is an epic hero and …show more content…

However fate may contribute to his downfall but only as a side kick as characterized by Aristotle's concept of tragedy. Oedipus justifies as a tragic hero because of his lack of self-knowledge. When he hears the story of how the king Laius, was brutally murdered, Oedipus wants to get to the bottom of the story and find the person who is guilty. When Oedipus is confronted by Tiresias about the murder of Laius, he is shocked and completely ignores the fact he murdered a man. This shows that Oedipus does not want to know the truth about him. Even after the accusations about Oedipus committing the murders, he is determined to find out the truth no matter what it takes. This is the second quality, becoming a truth seeker, which justifies Oedipus as a tragic hero. Oedipus desire to flee his fate, but his fate continually catches up with him and even unknowingly he acts according to his fate. On the other hand, Gilgamesh is an epic hero who acts according to what he wants and bringing up all the actions. He is a Demigod who goes on a quest to get immortality. Gilgamesh was far braver than Oedipus. He risked his life a number of times when he was in the company of his friend Enkidu. Gilgamesh goes on a dangerous journey to write his name amongst the famous men so that he can be remembered eternally; he says, “It is I who will establish fame for eternity (Gilgamesh 95)” Gilgamesh believed that he could …show more content…

Oedipus as king has qualities that make him an excellent ruler who anticipates his subjects’ needs. When the citizens of Thebes beg him to do something about the plague, Oedipus is already one step ahead of them as he has already sent Creon to the oracle for advice. When Creon tells Oedipus the plague will be lifted if Thebes banishes King Laius’s murderer. Oedipus decides to go to Tiresias the Prophet to solve the mystery of Laius’s murder so his subjects could be saved from the plague. He continues to search for the murderer even after Tiresias accuses him of being the murderer. On the other hand, Gilgamesh is total opposite of King Oedipus. Gilgamesh’s restless energies, he exhausts his subjects with ceaseless battle and arbitrary exercises of power. Beautiful to behold, Gilgamesh selfishly indulges his appetites, raping whatever woman he desires, whether she is the wife of a warrior or the daughter of a noble or a bride on her wedding night. However, after his quest to learn the secret of eternal life he ends up reconciled at last to his mortality. Gilgamesh resumes his proper place in the world and becomes a better

Open Document