Gideon V Wainwright Case Analysis

331 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gideon v. wainwright

The Sixth Amendment gives defendants the right to counsel in federal prosecutions. However, the right to counsel was not applied to state prosecutions for felony offenses until 1963 in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335. indignant are defendants that do not have enough money to go out and hire a private attorney, so therefore under the sixth amendment they have the right to have one appointed to them at no cost. According to Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2014) three quarters of state prison inmates had court- appointed lawyers to represent them for the offense for which they are serving time for. the three major ways of providing indigents with court appoitnted lawyers are assigned counsel, contract syatems, and public defenders. There

Show More
Related

  • Influential Supreme Court Case: Gideon vs. Wainwright

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    There have been several different Supreme Court cases over the years that have been influential to most everybody who is aware of them. For example, the case of Roe vs. Wade was and still is immensely influential and is the cause of pro-life/pro-choice debates. Another important case was Marbury vs. Madison, which was the first Supreme Court case to ever declare that a law passed by Congress was unconstitutional. Even though those two cases were a couple of the most important and influential in American history nothing compares to the influence that the case of Gideon vs. Wainwright has provided, in my opinion. This case was tremendously important to the way that law enforcement is to be carried out in that it forced detectives and FBI’s and the like to “do their homework” before declaring someone guilty of a crime. Although this case was very influential on the way police forces carry out their duties, I think the case was mostly important in that it forced all courts in the U.S. to have a greater recognition of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution and the story of the victim involved in this case.

    Read More

  • Gault V Us Case Summary

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    I. Facts: 15-year-old delinquent, Gerald Gault and a friend were arrested after being accused of making a lewd phone call to a neighbor. Gerald’s parents were not notified of the situation. After a hearing, the juvenile court judge ordered Gerald to surrender to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of minority (21). Gerald's attorney petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the state of Arizona for violating the juvenile’s 14th Amendment due process rights. The Superior Court of Arizona and the Arizona State Supreme Court both dismissed the writ affirmatively deciding that the juvenile’s due process rights were not violated.

    Read More

  • Gideon's Trumpet

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    At his trial Gideon could not afford a lawyer, so he asked the judge to appoint him one, Gideon argued that the Court should appoint him one because the Sixth Amendment says that everyone is entitled to a lawyer. The judge turned down his request, saying that the state did not have to pay a poor person's legal defense unless he was charged with a capital crime or that "special circumstances" existed. Gideon was left to represent himself in court.

    Read More

  • Gideon v. Wainwright

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    It has been 50 years since the Gideon v. Wainwright case. From a drifter, to a petty criminal, to the Supreme Court, Gideon opened doors for the poor man in the system. Because of this case, indigent defendants have access to legal counsel (public defenders), if they prove they cannot afford an attorney on their own.

    Read More

  • Gideon vs. Wainwright

    402 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Court ruled unanimously in Gideon's favor and held that the Fourteenth Amendment included state as well as federal defendants. The Court said that all states must provide an attorney in all felony and capital cases for people who cannot afford one. Through the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause, the Sixth Amendment guarantee of the right to counsel applies to the states. Gideon won his case and took the groundbreaking step in public defense lawyers being there for people that cannot afford a lawyer of their own.

    Read More

  • Gideon Vs. Wainwright

    676 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, Gideon was wrong. The rule applied by the Supreme Court at that time was in fact exactly the opposite. The Constitution, it had held, did not guarantee free counsel to all felony defendants that are unable to retain their own. Since1942, when Betts v. Brady was decided by a divided Court, the problem of defend...

    Read More

  • Gideon's Trumpet

    1561 Words  | 4 Pages

    On the morning of January 8th 1962, the Supreme Court received mail from prisoner 003826 of Florida State Prison, also known as Clarence Earl Gideon. In the envelope contained a hand written letter with questionable grammar from Gideon claiming that he was denied a fair trial due to the absence of a lawyer. Gideon’s writ of certiorari was an in forma pauperis petition or pauper’s petition. Due to the fact that most paupers’ petitions are from inmates who do not have the legal means to properly file a certiorari, the Court had special methods of handling cases such as Gideon’s. Paupers’ petitions according to Justice Frankfurter were “almost unintelligible and certainly do not present a clear statement of issues necessary for our understanding”(Lewis 35). It is reasonable to assume that the Court would not spend an exorbitant amount of time going through mounds of paupers’ petitions trying to find a case that seemed presentable. Statistically, about thirteen percent of petitions for certiorari on the regular docket are paupers’ petitions. In addition, only three percent of paupers’ petitions end up being granted. Nevertheless, Gideon’s case was treated just as equally as any other in forma pauperis case. Gideon’s handwritten documents were held for a month until Florida authorities replied to petition. A month passed by and Gideon’s petition was mailed to the office of Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1962. A conference was held in June to discuss whether or not Gideon’s petition should be granted. Gideon’s case was granted three days after the conference and from that day forward Gideon’s fight for justice would ensue. In the eyes of Gideon, an attorney was a fundamental right of due process. However, his biggest ch...

    Read More

  • Gideon Vs Wainwright Federalism

    1051 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wainwright also hindered federalism because it gave more rights to the individual people rather than the state government. After the Gideon v. Wainwright decision, Tobias Simon, a lawyer from the Florida Civil Liberties Union that offered to represent Gideon the second time the case was tried, reflected on the fact that “‘in the future, the name “Gideon” will stand for the great principle that the poor are entitled to the same type of justice as are those who are able to afford counsel’” (Lewis 239). Rather than before where the states decided what an accused person’s fate is when deciding if he or she should have a counsel, the power is shifted to the individual: it is his or her decision if he or she wants a lawyer. Furthermore, it is guaranteed to every individual, regardless of identity. Because “the poorest and least powerful of men--a convict with not even a friend to visit him in prison-- can take his cause to the highest court in the land and bring about a fundamental change in the law”, the state courts’ authority to determine right from wrong is diminished because any individual can fight it by bringing it to the Supreme Court’s attention, just like Clarence Earl Gideon did (Lewis 218). Every individual now has the power to address a problem created by the courts and the power to determine if they want a lawyer to help them, which, in turn,

    Read More

  • Victimized By The Court's Appointed Counsel

    1798 Words  | 4 Pages

    People are represented in court by two kinds of lawyers, court-appointed lawyers and public defenders, which mean "hired lawyers" (Green, 2001). People that have higher income can hire their own lawyers. The lower and middle-income people are mainly the ones who rely on court appointed lawyers. These people don't have the money to hire a lawyer. Court appointed lawyers are not working in your best interest for many reasons.

    Read More

  • Miranda vs. Arizona

    396 Words  | 1 Pages

    5. If you cannot afford an attorney, you have the right to have one appointed for you.

    Read More

  • The 6th Amendment and Criminal Proceedings

    839 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this paper I’m going to discuss what is the 6th amendment right, the elements of ineffective counsel, how judges deem a person as ineffective counsel from an effective counsel, cases where defendants believed their counsel was ineffective and judges ruled them effective. I will also start by defining what is the 6th amendment right and stating the elements of an ineffective counsel. The 6th amendment is the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury if the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause if the accusation; to be confronted with the witness against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense (U.S. Constitution). There were two elements to ineffective assistance of counsel: a defendant must prove that his or her trial attorney/ lawyer performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors the results of the proceeding would have been different (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 1984).

    Read More

  • Gideon Vs Wainwright Essay

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    The political and economical consequence of the Gideon vs. Wainwright Decision was , Its extended the 6th amendment through the 14th amendment to apply to the state. Also its gave defendants in criminal court the right to counsel in situations in where they couldn’t afford to hire an attorney. Clarence Earl Gideon was a man of very little education, who ran away from home when was in middle school. He spent much time wandering through life , going in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. The case Gideon vs. Wainwright gave the right to poor defendants to have a court appointed attorney. The impact of the case has been huge for defendants with little money who in the past may have been lost at trial without the help of attorney.

    Read More

  • Gideon V. Wainwright Case Summary

    667 Words  | 2 Pages

    This case violates the sixth amendment which guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial, the right to a lawyer, and the right to an impartial jury. It violates the sixth amendment because in Gideon’s first trial he was not appointed a lawyer when asked because Florida law stated that, an attorney may only be appointed to an indigent defendant in capital cases but any US law over rules any state law if they state different rights. The events that lead to this case going to the Supreme Court was that Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition (used to bring a prisoner before the court to determine if the person's imprisonment is lawful). Also he argued that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. After these events leading up to the Supreme Court decision they finally decided on March 18, 1963 that states are required to provide legal counsels to defendants charged with felony. They made this decision because they realized that since Gideon didn’t have a full education ( he only had one until the 8th grade) they saw that this violated a rule that was already in the US

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Sixth Amendment

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    The sixth amendment is indeed a right that carries tremendous importance with its name. It constitutes for many protections which Mallicoat (2016) summarizes by saying it “provides for the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of one’s peers in the jurisdiction where the crime occurred. Provides the right to be informed of the nature of the charges, to confront witnesses against oneself, and present witnesses in one’s defense. Provides the right to an attorney.” Having an impartial jury of one’s peers is extremely important in efforts to eliminate bias and a subjective, limited range of mindsets. If this cannot be obtained in the jurisdiction where the crime was committed, one may request trial to be held elsewhere, such as in the case

    Read More

  • The Sixth Amendment

    1917 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Sixth Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. It guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions in federal courts and it was ruled that these rights are fundamental and important. The Sixth Amendment gives the accused the right to speedy and public trial by the impartial jury. The accused has the right to be informed of the nature and reason of accusation and also be confronted with the witness against him as well as obtaining witness in his favor. In this research paper I will provide a thorough analysis of these above rights and give some history of the 6th Amendment.

    Read More

More about Gideon V Wainwright Case Analysis

Open Document