Find The Physics Selected Movies? Ghostbusters Introduction In 1984, Ghostbusters was produced and became a movie loved by many for years to come. During this movie, there were particular scenes that demonstrated the good and bad physics that most movies contain. In this movie, some were obvious while others had to be dug up in order to notice the science behind the scenes. Ghostbusters is a combination of fun and humorous but physics filled that might not have been noticed at first glance. Good Movie Physics In movies, there is physics constantly occurring without people even realizing it’s there. During the 37 minute scene, Peter Venkman and the Ghostbusters are looking for the ghosts that they were called in to take care of. They then walk …show more content…
Lightning is an electrical energy which produces both heat and sound. When lightning strikes, there is an imbalance in the charges between the lightning and the other object, such as a building. Considering the roughly 19-floor building is tall, it’s also more likely to strike. It says Hong Kong Observatory “...the taller object is more susceptible to lightning because of the shorter air gap between the lightning strike and the object.” The negative charge in the cloud connects with the positively charged object, causing the lightning to strike. This scene could be physically impossible because people don’t turn into terror dogs after being struck by lightning. To continue off of this particular scene, Zuul is from a different dimension. Interdimensional travel physically, hasn’t been proved to be possible or impossible. String theory is essentially when scientists attempt to comprehend how everything functions in the universe and how it’s all connected. A theory where everything is made of tiny, microscopic strings that make up all of the matter. Traveling from dimension to dimension has yet to be shown, so there is no possible evidence to prove how Zuul came to the world. Containing both the possible and impossible physics creates a more captivating scene for …show more content…
This movie wouldn’t be anything like what it is without the use of special effects. Whether it was the weapons they used, Dana levitating, or even the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man, it helped to create the movie we see today. Without the special effects, it would be hard to accomplish the goal of the movie which was to capture ghosts and encounter paranormal activity. It would be possible to still create the movie, but it wouldn’t be as entertaining and be more difficult to create. Special effects help enhance the movie using objects some wouldn’t think about. The equipment used also has to do with how good the quality of the CGI is. In Ghostbusters, Richard Edlund, who was a part of the special effects team, used a 65mm camera which made the visuals surpass what they thought they could originally achieve. The audience experience would be different since it wouldn’t have what makes the movie such a fun to watch. Nevertheless, the movie is imaginative, suspenseful, and embodies a plot that makes it intriguing to keep the viewers on the edge of their seats. It wouldn’t have changed the storyline indefinitely, but it would’ve altered some of the key scenes. It would’ve been difficult to create the final scene with Gozer, the eggs cooking, the books floating, etc. Special effects are what makes the movie more enthralling and engaging to watch. The best movies were still created before the use of
...orny” gave him his well deserved bragging rights for this mastermind film. Beetlejuice won an Oscar for best makeup and went on to win 6 other awards and 8 nominations. People liked this movie, because it was unlike the others being made in its time and was one of only few ever made from a Ghost’s point of view. The music that was used along with creative camera shots helped build excitement and kept the audience attentive. The slight raise of the volume when the camera made a close up on the fly in the cemetery along with others was highly effective with the scene action. Tim Burton was able to balance comedy and the more morbid aspects of the film brilliantly. The use of various colors, especially blue has become his trademark. All the actors fit perfectly in their roles in this movie, and their acting styles only contributed to the overall success of the film.
The book had a lot of thought put into it by the author and it appeals to many audiences of different ages. The book put me on the edge of my seat throughout the whole book, and it was one of those books that you never want to put down. The way the author wrote it had quite a suspenseful, eerie, dramatic feel to it and that is what made the book so great, on top of the plot. The plot of the book was also very well thought out and put together, and I enjoyed reading it. Although the movie was great, I don’t think that it did the book enough justice. There were so many great aspects of the book that they left out, that would’ve made the movie just that much better. They should have put in some of the missing scenes and still portrayed the characters the same as they were in the book. However, I think that it would be hard to create the same feel as Ray Bradbury did in writing the book. It was the way that he connected with his audience that made the book appealing. Both the book and the movie were fantastic ways of portraying the story. If they had kept all of the scenes and properties of characters as they did in the book, the movie would have appealed to me more. But, the movie version of the story could appeal to others more than the book
Lighting, editing, camera angles/movements and sound are used in many different ways. Ness didn't know what the bookkeeper looked like, this initially raised the tension and it continued to rise when he had to deal with the baby. All the elements together work red in different ways showing different things to the audience and helped to bring them into the scene. I think the movie was very successful, it had a lot of dramatic scenes which made me feel excited and tense. The actors and script were excellent, I learnt a lot about this period of American history and also the type of fashions that were popular.
The effects are done in a clunky CGI, which doesn't do this film any favors. This Day of the Dead could have taken some pointers from the 1985 version in regards to effects. Since out of the two, with over twenty years of technological advancement this version look by far the worst.
Suspense embodied this film and luckily during the late 1960's Hollywood was at a time where filmmakers were able to push the limits. Many religious groups were outraged with the movie but if it weren't for the work of Polanski in Rosemary's Baby, classic horror films, such as The Exorcist, and other suspense films would cease to exist.
Besides the great components that has formed, what I unlike many of the critics believe to be one of the greatness movie of all time, an aspect of the film that does not seem to disappoint is the special effects, more specifically, the CGI’s. BBC News states that “it is this hyper-real movie magic that has made the Oscar-winner one of the most sought after visual effects supervisors in Hollywood.” Oscar winning Scott Farrar was the visual effects supervisor in the entire preceding Transformers trilogy. The movie offered “a tour de force of special effects, even if the critics were less kind about the movie's storyline”. While some may say that the visual effects used in the film were too much and sometimes unnecessary, there is no doubt that Farrar achieved great lengths and challenged future innovators of the visual and special effects industry.
...lm. With the director’s use of special effects, this proves that he had an artistic way of showing the film, as well as his use of ambiguous scenes and sequences that were provided in the film. By making it a classical cinema film, the Kubrick did a good job in proving the realism of space and all, as well as using the film order to make the movie in order. By making the film both art and classical cinema, this just makes the movie even better and the director more smarter for being able to do this in one movie.
this film the special effects are great. With all the mummies that are created and the way
The special effects was not real and I feel like everything was just made up. The director of the movie came
The first ever special effects to make an appearance in a movie revolved around the re-creation of a beheading scene. Alfred Clark used his talents to bring to life the beheading of the Queen of Scots in the movie, The Execution of Mary Stewart. Pullman is a. Special effects were just being introduced and technology is not what it is now. Therefore, Clark had to have everybody stand still for the execution scene, while the actor was replaced with a dummy. Special effects makeup began with prosthetics and physical application, later evolving to mechanical apparatus concealed within the makeup, and eventually sensor compatible visual masterpieces.
Meanwhile the sound effects and special effects in Deadpool was off the charts. It adds to the movie and made it realistic with the sounds of comedy mixed in with violent action. The sound effects in this movie makes the movie more interesting and makes it comical. For example throughout the movie there are jokes made along with a lot of loud noises. Such as the sound of the unloading of guns, the active sounds of fighting, collapsing of buildings and explosions. Another thing that was big in this movie was the special effects in the movie. For example early in the movie Deadpool was confronted by some guys on the highway. However deadpool pulls out his gun and with the help of special effects the killings were in slow motion and gave it a realistic feeling. Likewise, the special effect and sound effects made the movie complete as a whole solidifying the suspense and action packed thrill moments of the
Some positives about the movie are that the visual effects were on point. There were some parts where it seemed like they had rushed some of the visual effects, but for the most part they worked out really well. The action in this movie was better meaning the content was better, but quantitatively it was very limited and weak.
It did so in a unique way that was different from any other film we have watched in class, but it was still very effective. By giving the audience so many theories, believes and stories in the beginning of the movie, the audience had no choice but to trust the narrator to tell them what is true or not. For me, I initially had no trust in the narrator and his stories, but by the end of the film he had convinced me to trust him and anything he said, something I never thought possible in the beginning of the film. I also thought the film visuals were very appropriate and helped to add a feeling and tone of mystery and intrigue, perfect for this film. I thought the visuals perfectly matched the narration and story
Travers states that “Clones is crammed with action, grand digital design.” (par 2). This shows that the effects in the movie were spectacular and the action scenes are absolutely everywhere. Another critic agrees, stating “Now is perhaps time to say that the special effects demonstrate impressive polish and visual integrity” (Scott par 12). This goes to show that the filmmakers did an excellent job in creating interesting visuals to entertain their audience.
Some of these qualities of the movie are quite charming; like the period hairstyles, or the style of the roleplaying and standards by Lili Taylor and Ron Livingston to play the Perron parents. Other claims of truthiness, though, are way less enjoyable. There are, of course, actual photos and the newspaper clippings that play over the end credits. And then, at the other side of the film, before we even get to our so called haunted house, we have scenes of the Warren’s (ghost hunters or demonic explorers) working other cases, and answering questions to interested humans in lecture halls to answer their ...